Austria sues European Union, claiming natural gas and nuclear energy are not 'green'

[wingnut771]

"Global warming" is a natural cycle.

Think tides and/or tidal changes.
High tide followed by low tide followed by high tide .........

We are currently in a natural warming cycle (think incoming tide), that will be followed by a natural cooling cycle (think outgoing tide).
The graph that you keep posting does not prove anything.
You can't map "the industrial revolution" onto a natural warming cycle to prove that CO2 emissions are responsible for the natural warming cycle.

I hope this answers your question.

No it doesn't answer my question, because my question was about the last 100 years. Why has the natural cycle been flat for more than 2000 years and then suddenly increasing in the last 100 years?

In the past, temperature changes happened gradually over 100 thousand years, not in one lifetime:

Global temperature record - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Ponderer]

No it doesn't answer my question, because my question was about the last 100 years. Why has the natural cycle been flat for more than 2000 years and then suddenly increasing in the last 100 years?
View attachment 1400423
In the past, temperature changes happened gradually over 100 thousand years, not in one lifetime:
View attachment 1400431

Global temperature record - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

* sigh *
It did my best to try and make you understand.
You are refusing to understand.

 

[wingnut771]

* sigh *
It did my best to try and make you understand.
You are refusing to understand.

Can you explain this?

 

[porchrat]

Can you explain this?

that's all water vapour dude.

It makes the plants grow.

 

[Ponderer]

Can you explain this?
View attachment 1400437 View attachment 1400439
View attachment 1400441

It's an increase of (roughly) 0.01%.
Rather insignificant in the greater scheme of things.

Water vapour's contribution to the "greenhouse effect" dwarves that of CO2, but this fact is completely ignored by those that are pushing the "climate crises" agenda.
CO2 emissions bad - CO2 emissions killing planet - need money to prevent imminent and catastrophic disaster.

The truth is that there is no "climate crises" - CO2 emissions are not responsible for "global warming" and/or "climate change".
It's not Science.
It's a concocted crises that is pure politics (propaganda).
It's about money.

 

[ForceFate]

It's an increase of (roughly) 0.01%.
Rather insignificant in the greater scheme of things.

I hope you're joking.

Water vapour's contribution to the "greenhouse effect dwarves that of CO2, but this fact is completely ignored by those that are pushing the "climate crises" agenda.
CO2 emissions bad - CO2 emissions killing planet - need money to prevent imminent and catastrophic disaster.

The truth is that there is no "climate crises" - CO2 emissions are not responsible for "global warming" and/or "climate change".
It's not Science.
It's a concocted crises that is pure politics (propaganda).
It's about money.

Scientists have shown in tests and models how CO2 is the major driver, results of which correlates with data collected. They've published countless papers in different countries. My question to you is can you post something which supports your assertion that CO2 is not a major driver of accelerated global warming? It doesn't have to be your work btw.

 

[Ponderer]

I hope you're joking.

Why is what I said a joke?

Scientists have shown in tests and models how CO2 is the major driver, results of which correlates with data collected. They've published countless papers in different countries. My question to you is can you post something which supports your assertion that CO2 is not a major driver of accelerated global warming? It doesn't have to be your work btw.

You admitted that you don't know any of "the Science".
You argue that "it is Science", but you don't know any of it.

Do you know any of the actual/true/real Science?

 

[ForceFate]

Why is what I said a joke?

In the face of evidence, it does sound like it.

You admitted that you don't know any of "the Science".

You said I don't understand the fundamentals. I asked you to reach me the fundamentals if you think I don't. You never honoured my request.

You argue that "it is Science", but you don't know any of it.

Do you know any of the actual/true/real Science?

You're putting words in my mouth. Don't forget this was only yesterday.

 

[MunosMachos]

In the past, temperature changes happened gradually over 100 thousand years, not in one lifetime:
View attachment 1400431

Global temperature record - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Quick spikes followed by quick drops. It looks like we are due for a quick drop?

 

[wingnut771]

Quick spikes followed by quick drops. It looks like we are due for a quick drop?

Do you see the scale on the graph? Do you mean a quick drop over thousands of years?

 

[tetrasect]

It's an increase of (roughly) 0.01%.

New mathamatical discovery by MyBB user shows that going from 300ppm to 400ppm is actually an increase of 0.01%, not 34% as previously thought

 

[tetrasect]

Look how these methane levels rose 150% due to humans 0.0001% completely naturally! It's insignificant!

 

[ForceFate]

New mathamatical discovery by MyBB user shows that going from 300ppm to 400ppm is actually an increase of 0.01%, not 34% as previously thought

I wondered if he took note of the scale but concluded he was trolling with that percentage.

 

[tetrasect]

I wondered if he took note of the scale but concluded he was trolling with that percentage.

It seems increasingly evident to me that he isn't a troll but rather a simple fool.

 

[Pak Fa Fui]

Do trees and plants give off CO2

 

[Ponderer]

Look how these methane levels rose 150% due to humans 0.0001% completely naturally! It's insignificant!

Behold the glorious logic of a climate cultist.

 

[wingnut771]

Do trees and plants give off CO2

They do, at night.

 

[ForceFate]

The glorious logic of a climate cultist.

Still waiting for your counterevidence mate.

 

[Pak Fa Fui]

They do, at night.

We need to get rid of them

 

[wingnut771]

We need to get rid of them

You neglect to mention that only 50% of what they absorb gets released, so still a net positive. That's where the wood comes from.