Austria sues European Union, claiming natural gas and nuclear energy are not 'green'

[Ponderer]

Yes you are.

That is exactly what you are.

LOL.
You should go and glue yourself to some or other artwork.

 

[ForceFate]

And what was the answer, my little cupcake.

I have explained it over and over.
Classic Dunning-Kruger though.
Clever enough to understand (be fooled by) some or other BS and to conclude that it must therefore be true (because you understand the BS) , but not clever enough to recognize the BS for what it is.
Thoroughly brainwashed.

I have shown you opinion of the brightest minds on the subject. Now, provide proof for your assertions.

 

[ToxicBunny]

And what was the answer, my little cupcake.

I have explained it over and over.
Classic Dunning-Kruger though.
Clever enough to understand (be fooled by) some or other BS and to conclude that it must therefore be true (because you understand the BS) , but not clever enough to recognize the BS for what it is.
Thoroughly brainwashed.

How can I have an answer if you refuse to provide anything...

And yes we are aware this thread is a great example of dunning kruger effect.

 

[tetrasect]

LOL.
You should go and glue yourself to some or other artwork.

There is no glue left. You've sniffed it all.

 

[tetrasect]

View attachment 1401277

Nuclear is the most expensive "solution". And carries the most potential danger.

Much better ones exist.

 

[rietrot]

Never mind methane which is much worse.
View attachment 1401411 View attachment 1401415

Atmospheric methane - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Methane and climate: 10 things you should know

The graph above shows methane concentrations in Earth's atmosphere over the past 10,000+ years: 8000 BCE to 2018 CE. The units are parts per billion (ppb). The year 1800 is marked with a circle. Note the ominous spike. As a result of increasing human-caused emissions, atmospheric methane...

www.darrinqualman.com

Bit silly to post these graphs when they do not correspond to temperature or sea level rise.

Or how far do they lag behind, supposedly? Why aren't we dead yet?

Might aswell enjoy however much time we have left, paying carbon tax cannot reverse those graphs.

 

[tetrasect]

Bit silly to post these graphs when they do not correspond to temperature or sea level rise.

Or how far do they lag behind, supposedly? Why aren't we dead yet?

Might aswell enjoy however much time we have left, paying carbon tax cannot reverse those graphs.

But it will make beef more expensive which will hopefully have the effect of people switching to plant-based alternatives.

Besides the alarming production of methane, beef production is also the number one contributor to deforestation.

Around 50% of all agriculture goes to feeding livestock.

Also, 326m2 of land produces 1kg of beef (wet weight) vs 85kg of soybeans (dry weight).

And to top it off, beef production also uses significantly more water resources.

So it's not just terrible for the environment, beef production is also a huge waste of resources.

 

[tetrasect]

Why aren't we dead yet?

Might aswell enjoy however much time we have left

 

[ToxicBunny]

But it will make beef more expensive which will hopefully have the effect of people switching to plant-based alternatives.

Besides the alarming production of methane, beef production is also the number one contributor to deforestation.

Around 50% of all agriculture goes to feeding livestock.

Also, 326m2 of land produces 1kg of beef (wet weight) vs 85kg of soybeans (dry weight).

And to top it off, beef production also uses significantly more water resources.

So it's not just terrible for the environment, beef production is also a huge waste of resources.

Oi watch it there buddy boy... I ain't braaiing a slab of soy on the fire...

 

[wingnut771]

Bit silly to post these graphs when they do not correspond to temperature or sea level rise.

Or how far do they lag behind, supposedly? Why aren't we dead yet?

Might aswell enjoy however much time we have left, paying carbon tax cannot reverse those graphs.

No one is disputing that the taxes are stupid, and that we aren't ****ed already.

 

[tetrasect]

Oi watch it there buddy boy... I ain't braaiing a slab of soy on the fire...

If you have a good enough recipe it's extremely difficult to tell the difference.

Went to a lot of mock meat restaurants in SE Asia and I can only say my mind was blown.

 

[ToxicBunny]

If you have a good enough recipe it's extremely difficult to tell the difference.

Went to a lot of mock meat restaurants in SE Asia and I can only say my mind was blown.

Recipe??? Wtf is that shyte... Salt and pepper and slabs of dead cow is all that's needed.

 

[Rosaudio]

Yeah - pollution is definitely a problem.
But CO2 emissions is not pollution - if anything, it's a nutrient for photosynthesis - the more CO2 there is, the faster/better plants gro.

Jesus Christ are there people who actually think like this...

 

[Johand]

Those magazines were the business... They still do similar things these days, but they're PO3S expensive now, last time I saw one that had a monthly magazine with a bit of a bigger project attached it was like R350 for the magazine.

They were ridiculously expense even back in the day! Only the rich kids I know could afford them!

I only got to own the first magazine because it usually had a introductory price well below the normal price.

 

[tetrasect]

Recipe??? Wtf is that shyte... Salt and pepper and slabs of dead cow is all that's needed.

My point is it's not actually needed.

Why waste resources, damage the environment and cause deforestation (not to mention the mass killing of animals) purely to insist on less healthy food that tastes practically the same?

Kinda like those people who say "I will never drive an electric car because it doesn't feel/sound the same". It's just an exceptionally bad reason to burn fossil fuels.

The real obstacle here is the price. It's easy to say "I'd rather eat real beef than pay extra to get some fake meat burger" but if Spur had beyond burger patties for cheaper than beef patties you can bet your ass people will eat the beyond burger patties.

It's just a matter of time.

 

[wingnut771]

My point is it's not actually needed.

Why waste resources, damage the environment and cause deforestation (not to mention the mass killing of animals) purely to insist on less healthy food that tastes practically the same?

Kinda like those people who say "I will never drive an electric car because it doesn't feel/sound the same". It's just an exceptionally bad reason to burn fossil fuels.

The real obstacle here is the price. It's easy to say "I'd rather eat real beef than pay extra to get some fake meat burger" but if Spur had beyond burger patties for cheaper than beef patties you can bet your ass people will eat the beyond burger patties.

It's just a matter of time.

I would try a grasshopper pattie.

 

[rietrot]

But it will make beef more expensive which will hopefully have the effect of people switching to plant-based alternatives.

Besides the alarming production of methane, beef production is also the number one contributor to deforestation.

Around 50% of all agriculture goes to feeding livestock.

Also, 326m2 of land produces 1kg of beef (wet weight) vs 85kg of soybeans (dry weight).

And to top it off, beef production also uses significantly more water resources.

So it's not just terrible for the environment, beef production is also a huge waste of resources.

After all of that doom that we have record numbers of CO2 more than ever before you think making beef slightly more expensive will do anything.

 

[rietrot]

No one is disputing that the taxes are stupid, and that we aren't ****ed already.

So what's the point then.

Maybe you are wrong. Just get out of the house and enjoy nature a bit. You'll feel better

 

[wingnut771]

So what's the point then.

Maybe you are wrong. Just get out of the house and enjoy nature a bit. You'll feel better

Have you watched this?

David Attenborough: A Life on Our Planet​

 

[ToxicBunny]

My point is it's not actually needed.

Why waste resources, damage the environment and cause deforestation (not to mention the mass killing of animals) purely to insist on less healthy food that tastes practically the same?

Kinda like those people who say "I will never drive an electric car because it doesn't feel/sound the same". It's just an exceptionally bad reason to burn fossil fuels.

The real obstacle here is the price. It's easy to say "I'd rather eat real beef than pay extra to get some fake meat burger" but if Spur had beyond burger patties for cheaper than beef patties you can bet your ass people will eat the beyond burger patties.

It's just a matter of time.

Oh I agree but muh steak bro!