I'm still looking for one that I know you would "approve of". The crux of the matter is that, just like with covid, there are peer studies for both sides of the argument.
Post any peer reviewed study.
Any peer reviewed study will do... Just one
That's a bit rich coming from you..
I mean, I'm not wrong…Climate cultists calling other people morons.
My knowledge and understanding may not be at that level, but I know enough to understand your anti-establishment beliefs are not rooted in science.
See post #777 and #786.
Warming Power of CO2 and H2O: Correlations with Temperature Changes
The dramatic and threatening environmental changes announced for the next decades are the result of models whose main drive factor of climatic changes is the increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Although taken as a premise, the hypothesis does not have verifiable consistence. The...www.scirp.org
Of course the only place you would find such a paper is from a Chinese open-access junk journal that:
A.) Has a rating of 0 (non-academic) on the Norwegian Scientific Index.
B.) Is on Beall's list of predatory publishers.
C.) Is listed on Cabell's Predatory Reports as a "well-known predatory publisher"
D.) Has no peer review process.
E.) Was caught accepting a paper that is literally gibberish spat out by a computer program.
Excerpt from that paper:
Did you miss the "peer reviewed" part of the sentence where @ForceFate asked you to post any study? Cause I can write a paper about how I flew to the moon and collected dinosaur eggs and "Scientific Research" would publish it.
Thank you Heidie.
Sign up with Google