Austria sues European Union, claiming natural gas and nuclear energy are not 'green'

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,971
I think it also depends on the family..

My nephew is dino-bevok, and army bevok as well... Even had to get him the Top Trumps set (who the hell know that shyte still existed)
oh my son loves army stuff, even now at almost 11, but Dinosaurs he's never really been a fan, same as planes and cars, but if you look around my office, I've got planes, cars, dragons, dinosaurs and superheroes, all things he's not really into besides army :).
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,498
I was being sarcastic.
But you knew that, right?

And what is the effective greenhouse effect of water vapour vs CO2 then since you seem to be all up in this "Science" thing?

Also what is the duration of the CO2 effect vs water vapour? How long does each one last in the atmosphere?
 

Moosedrool

Honorary Master
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
11,441
And what is the effective greenhouse effect of water vapour vs CO2 then since you seem to be all up in this "Science" thing?

Also what is the duration of the CO2 effect vs water vapour? How long does each one last in the atmosphere?

The way I understand is that heat trapping with water equates to half of the natural earth heating but it's also pretty balanced since at high humidity it will condense to form clouds effectively reflecting most light that would otherwise have contributed to the ground heat.

The issue is introducing more heat causes more water vapor as well as an increasing dew point temperature. The air can hold more water vapor before it has to condense and when it does the energy is greater causing more extreme weather events.
 

TheMightyQuinn

Not amused...
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
31,961
Aside from producing large volumes of radioactive waste that remain radioactive for thousands of years, sure.
That is true and a big worry...especially due to the incredibly huge life cycles of said waste and the generations of people that will have to look after it.

This explains it perfectly:



But so it the millions of tons of spent solar panels about to also enter the Earth's waste cycle........etc etc.

Humans need energy and the sun and wind is not enough....because we are too many people on this planet.

It is a conundrum indeed...but I'd rather take nuclear waste than billions of tons of plastic and "glass" and end of cycle batteries.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,971
That is true and a big worry...especially due to the incredibly huge life cycles of said waste and the generations of people that will have to look after it.

This explains it perfectly:



But so it the millions of tons of spent solar panels about to also enter the Earth's waste cycle........etc etc.

Humans need energy and the sun and wind is not enough....because we are too many people on this planet.

It is a conundrum indeed...but I'd rather take nuclear waste than billions of tons of plastic and "glass" and end of cycle batteries.
And the more we use nuclear we are getting better at reusign it's waste, in 70 years it's not using that much storage as you'd expect. Also the waste from solar is toxic for-ever there is no half-life on it's toxicity.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,498
The way I understand is that heat trapping with water equates to half of the natural earth heating but it's also pretty balanced since at high humidity it will condense to form clouds effectively reflecting most light that would otherwise have contributed to the ground heat.

The issue is introducing more heat causes more water vapor as well as an increasing dew point temperature. The air can hold more water vapor before it has to condense and when it does the energy is greater causing more extreme weather events.

Oh 100% that its a massive complicated system...

But I'm trying to simplify this down to its most simple terms... and a comparison between the global warming effects per pm of water vapour vs CO2
 

Bobbin

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
9,477
Who remembers those learning magazine series that used to come with glow in the dark pieces/skeletons to put together into dinosaurs? Can't remember if they were weekly or monthly :) They still have those these days?
I also used to collect the series with all the different minerals and gems.
There was once a time people were convinced I was going to become an archeologist/paleontologist/geologist or something along those lines lol.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,498
3 silly questions, and 1 valid question to which the answer is glaringly obvious if you know what you are talking about.

No, they are all valid questions, as they all attempt to ascertain your understanding of the basic subject that you are "happy to discuss"

But hell, I'll even accept you answer the 1 question you class as valid (but you will need to point out which one you deem valid)
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,498
Who remembers those learning magazine series that used to come with glow in the dark pieces/skeletons to put together into dinosaurs? Can't remember if they were weekly or monthly :) They still have those these days?
I also used to collect the series with all the different minerals and gems.
There was once a time people were convinced I was going to become an archeologist or geologist lol.

Those magazines were the business... They still do similar things these days, but they're PO3S expensive now, last time I saw one that had a monthly magazine with a bit of a bigger project attached it was like R350 for the magazine.
 

Bobbin

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
9,477
The way I understand is that heat trapping with water equates to half of the natural earth heating but it's also pretty balanced since at high humidity it will condense to form clouds effectively reflecting most light that would otherwise have contributed to the ground heat.

The issue is introducing more heat causes more water vapor as well as an increasing dew point temperature. The air can hold more water vapor before it has to condense and when it does the energy is greater causing more extreme weather events.

Not just the more extreme weather that is concerning... I recalled this video below discussing the tipping point... seems legit? It's not about the gradual changes, but the eventual runaway it might cause "suddenly". Not an expert though so no idea.

 

zippy

Honorary Master
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
10,321
Well you aren't wrong in a very broad sense. CO2 isn't killing the planet, earth will carry on whatever the level of CO2 is... But it is killing the planet for us.

The indeed. Planet is doing great. It’s the idiots on surface who are f###ed
 
Top