Your quote says ordering Muslims not Shia Muslims. Does the average fanatic care?
my point stands
I will help you even further, there was nothing binding about that fatwa on anyone
Your quote says ordering Muslims not Shia Muslims. Does the average fanatic care?
Doesn't seem to have mattered to the nut who stabbed him. When a fatwa does bind, how is it enforced and who is expected to carry it out. Easier in the theocracies in the east I guess but outside of a theocracy you'll be arrested. I imagine the fanatics do want to be killed for it.my point stands
I will help you even further, there was nothing binding about that fatwa on anyone
Doesn't seem to have mattered to the nut who stabbed him.

The binding or not of it doesn't seem to have mattered in this case. The number of attempts on his life makes it clear that some in the faith took the mullah's words to mean it's binding. I'm sure people have been killed on fatwas issues by Al Qaeda and Taliban.as you say, its a nut, thats the end of the discussion
out of 1.5bn sunni muslims, it took one (possibly shia) nut to do something 30 years later
if thats not evidence of a fatwa that has no binding then I'm not sure what you consider to be binding
View attachment 1364243
And the relevance of that to this thread?There are at least two popular violent religions of peace.
The binding or not of it doesn't seem to have mattered in this case. The number of attempts on his life makes it clear that some in the faith took the mullah's words to mean it's binding. I'm sure people have been killed on fatwas issues by Al Qaeda and Taliban.
Most of the religion of peace supporters then seems to be nutjobs.a fatwa is nonbinding...
if like you, nut jobs think it's binding that doesn't change the fact that fatwas are non binding
On 14 February 1989, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of Iran and one of the most prominent Shi'a Muslim leaders, issued a fatwa calling for the death of Rushdie and his publishers.
Whats that word.
For lying to people, if it suits the religion.
There are two religions that i know of that allow it.
Most of the religion of peace supporters then seems to be nutjobs.
Last I checked, shouting "Mohammad" at something outrageous didn't mean too much, but if it makes you feel better... Mohammed, Allah...!So go ahead and use another famous religious figure.
Like the one in the religion in the article mentioned.
Cmon lets see if you would do it then.
Bet you wont.
Thanks hon.Last I checked, shouting "Mohammad" at something outrageous didn't mean too much, but if it makes you feel better... Mohammed, Allah...!
Now... FO!
Tell me what I evaded and I'll front up to it, otherwise begone troll.Thanks hon.
You will be pleased to note that you evaded.
Quote my post where I praised the other...You used a blasphemous term in relation to Christians.
And praised the other.
Interesting, I didn't know it was a shia fatwa, I'm assuming sunni's(the majority/largest muslim sect) would just ignore it because most of them seem to look upon shia as if they are dirt?also it was a shia that gave the fatwa
so apparently fatwas issued by shia are binding on sunni muslims if we go by the premises of what has already been stated about fatwas in this thread.
![]()
Satanic Verses controversy - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A reminder the sort of thing that led to this, and Cat Stevens is Western educated, vile
Rushdie isn't dead mate..Should charge Cat with murder.
School shooters and mass shooters in the US that livestream and post manifestos about it disagree with you