Baby faced boy is father at 13

PeterCH

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
18,371
Yeah, i re-read the article to find shes 15... they were both too young... wonder what the parents think

She is a pedophile. Her name should go on the sex offenders registry.
So should his.

(Kid was prolly 12 at conception.)
 

PeterCH

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
18,371
Becuase they both under the age of 16, does this mean no charges are filed?

1. They are both breaking the law.
2. The girl, psychologically speaking, was sexually attracted to a prepubertal (in appearance and age) male. Granted she conceived so he wasn't entirely prepubertal - in fact he was pubertal/adolescent, but what attracted her was his underage looks. It's a complicated issue but psychologically it is worrying that a 14/15 yo would have sex with a baby faced 12 y/o.
 

Smooth Criminal

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
3,895
1. They are both breaking the law.
2. The girl, psychologically speaking, was sexually attracted to a prepubertal (in appearance and age) male. Granted she conceived so he wasn't entirely prepubertal - in fact he was pubertal/adolescent, but what attracted her was his underage looks. It's a complicated issue but psychologically it is worrying that a 14/15 yo would have sex with a baby faced 12 y/o.
I think you're talking crap mate :)
 

PeterCH

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
18,371
I think you're talking crap mate :)

Explain. UK has a registry of sex offenders to protect children from them. This teenage girl had sex with a child. Why is her case so different? Can children
be safe around her?

I think you just don't understand. Educate yourself, 'mate'.
 

Smooth Criminal

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
3,895
Explain. UK has a registry of sex offenders to protect children from them. This teenage girl had sex with a child. Why is her case so different? Can children
be safe around her?

I think you just don't understand. Educate yourself, 'mate'.
I think this says it all:
The girl, psychologically speaking, was sexually attracted to a prepubertal (in appearance and age) male. Granted she conceived so he wasn't entirely prepubertal - in fact he was pubertal/adolescent, but what attracted her was his underage looks.
Not only are you confused about whether he reached puberty or not, but you're speculating on what she was attracted to. Are you perhaps the teenage girl in the article? You seem rather confident about what she saw in the guy.
 

PeterCH

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
18,371
I think this says it all:

Not only are you confused about whether he reached puberty or not, but you're speculating on what she was attracted to. Are you perhaps the teenage girl in the article? You seem rather confident about what she saw in the guy.

I think anyone can say with confidence that the attraction was SEXUAL,
because SEX and conception resulted. This was no platonic friendship
between two children, this was an adult relationship and therefore the motivations for it can be seen as being adult. I'm not the teenage girl in question but attractions leading to sex are sexual. Most people do not
get turned on sexually by underage people, but she did.

Anyhow the DSM-IV definition would exclude her but this is
quite a worrying issue. I wouldn't want her near my under 13 year old son.

Of course she may have been forced (raped) or otherwise co-erced into it. However, seeing as girls
mature faster than boys and she was 3 years older than him, I would think she'd be psychologically
and physically been able to resist his advances. Of course she could also be mentally retarded.
 

Smooth Criminal

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
3,895
I think anyone can say with confidence that the attraction was SEXUAL,
because SEX and conception resulted. This was no platonic friendship
between two children, this was an adult relationship and therefore the motivations for it can be seen as being adult. I'm not the teenage girl in question but attractions leading to sex are sexual. Most people do not
get turned on sexually by underage people, but she did.

Anyhow the DSM-IV definition would exclude her but this is
quite a worrying issue. I wouldn't want her near my under 13 year old son.

Of course she may have been forced (raped) or otherwise co-erced into it. However, seeing as girls
mature faster than boys and she was 3 years older than him, I would think she'd be psychologically
and physically been able to resist his advances. Of course she could also be mentally retarded.
I'm not arguing this any further. Your statement was 'but what attracted her was his underage looks'. Your response here is unrelated to what I called you on.

Btw she's 2 years older than him, if you bothered to read the article.
 

PeterCH

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
18,371
Btw she's 2 years older than him, if you bothered to read the article.

2 years old. Same thing, girls mature faster than boys at that age. A 14/15 y/o girl can be adult in many respects, a 12/13 y/o boy is usually a total kid.

Anyway I think she needs help and not just in raising the baby. Obviously he needs to. Parents should be locked up possibly.
 

gregmcc

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
25,533
That's seriously sad!

He looks young enough to be her son!

The parents should be fined.
 

Fuma

Executive Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
5,111
So it's true what they say about the number 13.
I wanted to say TIA. What should I say now?
 
G

Guest 20221009

Guest
sick stuff indeed, the girl looks like some adult IMO.What the heck was this kid thinking? anyways, what if its not his kid..I mean, 12year olds cant(biologically) father babies now can they..
 
Top