Bandwidth Saving Solution???

Hogrod

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
1,869
This might be useful for those who are keen to reduce your bandwidth usage. Or for those on small packages like me on the I-go.
In my dial up days my ISP was Mweb, to speed things up they gave users the propel accelarator. I've now subscribed to this service because it helps to speed up my connection by using compression, and therefore reduce the amount of data downloaded to your pc. This should have the effect of saving bandwidth because it reduces the size of the images/pages it is downloading.

This thing apparantly works by the following :

"Propel Accelerator is designed to provide maximum acceleration for all Web sites and additional acceleration for the Web sites you visit regularly. So, the more you surf, the faster your favorite pages will load."

Compression. Images and other graphic objects are compressed by removing some of the image detail. This results in dramatically smaller images that are delivered to your computer much quicker.

Caching. Propel intelligently retains and reuses Web pages and page elements that have previously been sent to your desktop.

Chunk Encoding with Parallel Connections. When a user begins to download a file larger than 100KB, this feature downloads different segments of the same file from different locations.

I found it here http://www.propel.com/home/aboutPA.jsp and its $4.95 a month, there are lots of other features.

Anyway I will cut the sales talk and give the hard facts, here are my download stats after 3 weeks of usage

Download Type | Original Size(without Propel) | Compressed(With propel) | Ratio
Web Text | 78.2 | 31.3 | 60%
Graphics | 126.5 | 56.3 | 57%
Email | 9.2 | 3.9 | 57%
Total | 213.9 | 91.5 | 57%

So it looks like I've saved myself a lot of bandwidth. Though correct if I'm wrong! I'd like to hear what you guys think of this possible bandwidth saving solution. Anyway take a look, it might save you some of that hard earned bandwidth we all buy every month.
 

titanium

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
278
Hi Andytl5

I think it's totally wrong that we should be seeking ways to "conserve bandwidth" on the very fundamentals of web browsing and email. I don't believe we should structure our bandwidth needs according to Telkom's ideas of what constitutes fair capping - it is Telkom who should adapt (and play catch-up with the rest of the world).

While I understand that you want to maximise your browsing time because of the limitations imposed on the cap, I would submit that you instead spend your money on a 30Gb account for R200 (until November, anyway) and join in the campaign against Telkom's short sighted business model aimed at making Internet access as expensive and unusable as possible.

Cheers

EDIT: Oops, didn't notice this thread was in the iBurst forum. That's what I get for reading forums via RSS. Nevertheless, whether it's WBS, Sentech or Telkom - they should adapt to users' needs!
 
Last edited:
Top