Good riddance to this arrogant thing who never listened to his mother when she told him to chew with his mouth closed.
Also retired 3 (THREE) English captains!1) 27 centuries, none in a losing cause.
2) only player with 1000+ runs in successful 4th innings run chases.
3) Most wins by a captain.
4) Lead his country for 100 tests.
5) took over after a disappointing 2003 WC and at the age of 22 was expected to rebuild the team and indeed a nations confidence in its cricket team.
6) Most runs scored whilst captaining a team.
7) His critical role in our 438 chase
8) Achieved 2 series win in Australia. ( first time for SA)
9) first team to win a series in Australia since 91/92 ( can't remember exact date)
10) hasn't lost a test series in 5 years
11) hasn't lost a test series away from home since 2006.
None of this would have been achieved without Smith. Just think how many international captains Smith has seen come and go, then you will realise the toll it takes on players. Not everyone is cut out for captaincy, and 99% of people won't last 10 years in the job. This is especially true when you have the internal politics of CSA. Dealing with Quotas, transformation and an expectant public, isn't the easiest thing to do.
His role can't just be defined in numbers, the culture, the backroom, the winning mentality, the leader and the grooming of young players has come through from Smith and the structures that he was critical in setting up. He is integral in the way we have done things for a decade and he has given us many highlights.
In my mind, we would not be where we are without Smith and his influence over the past decade.
Is that really all you've been able to focus on for the last 11 years of Graeme Smith's career?
Mostly, yes. As a cricketer he was not necessarily that much better than those around him. To be an exceptional cricketer you have to be better than the rest. He wasn't, IMO.
Mostly, yes. As a cricketer he was not necessarily that much better than those around him. To be an exceptional cricketer you have to be better than the rest. He wasn't, IMO.
Good riddance to this arrogant thing who never listened to his mother when she told him to chew with his mouth closed.
I never said he's a bad player. I said he was not exceptional, IMO.Opening is a specialist position and cannot be compared to batsmen who come lower down. Openers often have to face the best conditions for bowling. Smith is one of the best openers ever, let alone from SA.
No one, really. But the absense of someone else to use instead does not make him a better player. It just makes him the default one.Just out of interest, who would you have picked in his place?
What?He also never listened to her when he stuck a note on the fridge at age 12 that said "Goal- Proteas Captain"
How are my achievements (or lack thereof) relevant? And yes, I have already achieved what I set out to, thanks for asking.What have you achieved that you set out to do at an early age, how passionate are you.
Here is an excellent article from Firdose Moonda http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-australia-2013-14/content/story/725391.html
The bloke was thrust into captaincy at age 22 and changed the SA cricket team culture and led from front. By his own admission an 'ugly batsman' , and that itself as Boucher rightly says is where his btechnique could not overcome the poor form...he needed passion and motivated to make his technique work...hard to keep the motivation going.
All I'm saying is there's this praise from all side for the guy, but he was an arrogant person who did not play the game in the gentlemanly manner it is supposed to be played, he was not exceptional, just run of the mill. No doubt he could play cricket, but he's no Jacques Kallis or Ricky Ponting, or hell, even Hansie Cronje. He was just meh.
.
I never said he's a bad player. I said he was not exceptional, IMO.
No one, really. But the absense of someone else to use instead does not make him a better player. It just makes him the default one.
What?
How are my achievements (or lack thereof) relevant? And yes, I have already achieved what I set out to, thanks for asking.
All I'm saying is there's this praise from all side for the guy, but he was an arrogant person who did not play the game in the gentlemanly manner it is supposed to be played, he was not exceptional, just run of the mill. No doubt he could play cricket, but he's no Jacques Kallis or Ricky Ponting, or hell, even Hansie Cronje. He was just meh.
The number of times he's been given out LBW, for example. That's probably (I could be wrong) the most dominant way he's ever been dismissed. Why did he not address this and work on it? Maybe he did work on it, maybe he didn't. Who knows. But it certainly does not look like it.
He never struck me as someone that cares about the fans, the game's reputation, or the game's progress. He just cared about himself. I mean hell, with a nickname like Biff I would expect nothing less than arrogance. He thought he was captain and coach, and bullied the coaches to accept his point of view.
Once, even John Robbie on the radio asked him why he had to chew like that on the field. Nothing wrong with chewing with your mouth closed, though, but geez have some class and close your mouth already.
Anyway, it should be obvious that my opinion of him is pretty low. Good riddance, I stil say.
Thank god he was nothing like that matchfixer...![]()
Back in his youth he hit on my sister. Bless him.
A couple years go he hit on my girlfriend while smashed in a club.
lolI'd like to say he hit on my sister but no, it was me
kidding