Bikini model says SARS ruined her life

[Craig_]

If you want a killer bj stand at any AW glory hole. Entrance fee is like 50 bucks.

That won't be a R150m BJ. This has got to be other worldly.

Ain't no BJ worth $16m... girl gotta get WAY more freaky than that to get that level of greenback...

I don't think my mind is dirty enough to imagine what she could've done to justify that R150m, never mind the billion she was expecting to still come.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Well she is blond....

Not anymore it seems, and she has spent some of that R150m unwisely under the knife it seems...

From her own Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/jean.candice/

 

[Craig_]

Not anymore it seems, and she has spent some of that R150m unwisely under the knife it seems...

From her own Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/jean.candice/

All that money and she still has hang titties?

 

[ToxicBunny]

All that money and she still has hang titties?

I think she paid extra for those..... they're not the same ones she had when she was 20 and being debased by Hariri and his cohorts.

 

[Cray]

Not anymore it seems, and she has spent some of that R150m unwisely under the knife it seems...

From her own Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/jean.candice/

Eish, she was absolutely knock out before - such a pity...

 

[ToxicBunny]

Eish, she was absolutely knock out before - such a pity...

I know... she was absolutely stunning before the knife and downgrades....

 

[Craig_]

I think she paid extra for those..... they're not the same ones she had when she was 20 and being debased by Hariri and his cohorts.

She downgraded herself, wth is wrong with this person.

Eish, she was absolutely knock out before - such a pity...

Before pics?

 

[mercurial]

She downgraded herself, wth is wrong with this person.

Money can do funny things to people...

 

[ToxicBunny]

She downgraded herself, wth is wrong with this person.



Before pics?

 

[Craig_]

Are you sure that's the same person? She looks very good in this pic, that other one I won't even do with Zuma's spear.

 

[Cray]

Are you sure that's the same person? She looks very good in this pic, that other one I won't even do with Zuma's spear.

Yup, here is another - before she went for the cheap Angelina Jolie botox lips effect....

 

[ToxicBunny]

Are you sure that's the same person? She looks very good in this pic, that other one I won't even do with Zuma's spear.

Definitely the same person...

Maybe a few less neurons (not that she could afford to lose any but hey)

 

[Sinbad]

Very murky story, need to be careful of libel laws here:
If the Mauritius trip took place in 2012, and she was born in 1993, then she was 19 at the time of the 'modelling services'. I wonder if her father was her legal guardian, since she was under 21 when the 'donation' took place?

No, emancipation is at 18 nowadays, not 21.

 

[Compton_effect]

She was cute. But now... Yikes. Incredible how ugly a beautiful woman can be.

 

[ShaunSA]

Jirre wtf did she do to herself?

 

[mercurial]

Jirre wtf did she do to herself?

She got fkd and fkd up.

 

[Aghori]

Jirre wtf did she do to herself?

She became a whore.

 

[Gordon_R]

No, emancipation is at 18 nowadays, not 21.

OK, changed in 2005/2007. Still, its dodgy for an 19 year old to be handling $millions...

 

[Swa]

It is.
S 102(1) of the TAA:
102. Burden of proof.—(1) A taxpayer bears the burden of proving—
(a) that an amount, transaction, event or item is exempt or otherwise not taxable;
(b) that an amount or item is deductible or may be set-off;
(c) the rate of tax applicable to a transaction, event, item or class of taxpayer;
(d) that an amount qualifies as a reduction of tax payable;
(e) that a valuation is correct; or
(f) whether a ‘decision’ that is subject to objection and appeal under a tax Act, is incorrect.

Which has no bearing. "Burden of proof" in the case of Sars is merely having a plausible explanation. If Sars have a different scenario they must prove it in court as we're still under innocent until proven guilty.

Modelling isn't illegal, afaik prostitution is. Not that modelling is that much different to it.

Which is arbitrary. You do also know prostitution isn't illegal everywhere just as modelling isn't legal everywhere?

 

[Vrotappel]

Which has no bearing. "Burden of proof" in the case of Sars is merely having a plausible explanation. If Sars have a different scenario they must prove it in court as we're still under innocent until proven guilty.


Which is arbitrary. You do also know prostitution isn't illegal everywhere just as modelling isn't legal everywhere?

You struggle to read tax law?

If SARS tax you on any amount the burden is on you to prove it is not taxable.

That is very simple to understand. I've quoted the law to you. If you still struggle to understand you can research some case law.

For example - CIR v First National Bank of South Africa Ltd 62 SATC 253

Tax law is based on statute not common law.