OCP
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2014
- Messages
- 5,306
Not following?In Perth, you shall find justice man.
Not following?In Perth, you shall find justice man.
Looks like samaritan hearts are bleeding due to blood cancer affected Clive. I wonder if same will happen if Zuma has blood cancer.
Can you post a source about him being denied medical parole because Hani family doesn't allow it?
www.freepressjournal.in
On July 9, 2014, his application for placement on medical parole was considered by the Medical Parole Advisory Board.
The Board then made a recommendation that Masutha should place the offender on medical parole.
“I have now considered the offender’s application. In making my decision, I took into account the applicable legislation, recommendations made by the Board as well as the submission made by Mrs Hani and the SACP,” Masutha said.
“In the circumstances, the Board’s recommendation to place the offender on medical parole is not approved. This decision will be communicated to his (Derby-Lewis’s) legal representative as required by the court order.”
I am not in any way suggesting that he wasn't qualifying for medical parole, I was just interested in that particular point I raised.
I think there could be some confusion between Derby Lewis and Walusz.
That's a very confusing way of going about proving my point, but noted.I was proving your point dumbass!
Which part of "Note the reasons for denial are all medical:" did you not read?
Shooting communists should earn a person a medal in a free society.![]()
Parole for South African political leader’s killer rejected
Parole for South African political leader’s killer rejectedwww.freepressjournal.in
Join the dots.
Oh? So we are joining the dots now? That's a massive departure from the confident claim you made![]()
Parole for South African political leader’s killer rejected
Parole for South African political leader’s killer rejectedwww.freepressjournal.in
Join the dots.
Oh? So we are joining the dots now? That's a massive departure from the confident claim you made
36] It is needless to state that the representations by the third and fourth respondents have been considered to form a critical component of the hearing. That much is evident not only from the history of applicant's incarceration but also from the court orders referred to above. A fortiori the significance and impact of those representations would even be more significant to the interests more particularly of the applicant, the third and the fourth respondents. That much would be obvious even to the third and fourth respondents yet for some unknown reason the applicant was not served with their representations.
[37] Upon reading the reasons given by the first respondent for his decision, more particularly with reference to this issue of "remorse", it becomes patently clear that he took the third and fourth respondents' representations into account in reaching his decision. This was done without him being in possession of the applicant's response thereto.
Lol..Looks like samaritan hearts are bleeding due to blood cancer affected Clive. I wonder if same will happen if Zuma has blood cancer.
It did for a while .......Shooting communists should earn a person a medal in a free society.
If AIDS & Stds were valid for medical parole then our prisons would be emptyZuma has AIDS and a couple of other STDS because the could never keep his dick in his pants.
No it wont, this is not a normal inmate, this is Zuma, he is viewed differently under the law. I also think it is AIDS.If AIDS & Stds were valid for medical parole then our prisons would be empty
"It should be noted that according to SAMS -- that's the military people -- the condition of Mr Zuma required that he be under care of a medic on a 24-hour basis, a situation which was not possible at the facility as the correctional centre can only accommodate inmates overnight," said Advocate Dali Mpofu, Zuma's legal representative.
"Therefore the medic could not be allowed to spend 24 hours with Mr Zuma as the medic could not be accommodated in the correctional facility."
The sock business must be doing well, that was my thoughts. Until I started doing calculations and realized South Africa is not buried in socks ...One thing which may be of some consolation to us - he got a hefty lawyery bill to pay.
They will most probably solicit donations from his supporters... and scammers will join the fray.
Not my circus, not my monkeys, but it will be interesting to watch.
One thing which may be of some consolation to us - he got a hefty lawyery bill to pay.
They will most probably solicit donations from his supporters... and scammers will join the fray.
Not my circus, not my monkeys, but it will be interesting to watch.
He had a lot more than that, as listed in his 2011 parole application, he had prostate cancer, hypertension, skin cancer and a gangrenous spot in his leg. A person who is genuinely ill and dying has no qualms about revealing the nature of his illnesses.Clive Derby-Lewis was repeatedly denied medical parole, even though the medical parole board recommended medical parole.
This was due to the family of Hani ' not allowing it'.
Nowhere is it a requirement to require the victim's family permission.
Derby-Lewis had end stage lung cancer.
Even though medical parole had been denied, he was released on parole
Here is the judgment: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2015/661.html
Note the reasons for denial are all medical:
---
[28] The reasoning for the refusal to place the applicant on medical parole by the first respondent is briefly as follows:
28.1. In its recommendation, the Board states that Mr Derby-Lewis is suffering from stage lllB lung cancer and this serves largely as a basis upon which it recommends his placement on medical parole. This finding and recommendation appears to be oblivious of the fact that in terms of the Act, read with relevant Regulations, it is an inmate with malignant cancer stage IV with metastasis being inoperable or with both radiotherapy and chemotherapy failure that qualifies for placement on medical parole. It is therefore inconceivable how the Board came to its conclusion.
28.2. The applicant was found by the first respondent not to have been rendered physically incapacitated so as to severely limit his daily activity or self-care.
28.3. There were no indications to whether the offender had "showed any remorse for the crimes committed."
28.4. The first respondent has since disavowed reference to the use of pseudonyms used at the hospital by applicant and I therefore make no reference to that issue.
---
Very interesting that a dying cancer patient does not qualify for medical parole but Zuma suffering from mystery bullshit disease does qualify.
Everyone is equal hey...