Breonna Taylor: Lawsuit after US health worker shot dead by police

TysonRoux

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
11,456

How the 'no-knock' warrant for Breonna Taylor's apartment differed from others​


00de58d8-e162-4635-9753-74595f6b10f4-breezeway.jpg


Louisville Metro Police officers who sought "no-knock" search warrants the last two years most often said they needed them for suspects in homicides or who have a "propensity for violence," a Courier Journal review shows.

That's in stark contrast to the reason mentioned for the no-knock warrant obtained for Breonna Taylor's home in March.

Taylor had no record of violence — in fact, she had no criminal record at all. And police have said they didn't believe she had a gun when they entered her home shortly before 1 a.m. March 13.

Detective Joshua Jaynes told a judge police needed a search warrant with a no-knock provision for Taylor's apartment, which allows detectives to break down someone's door without first giving them time to respond.

The reason? They were afraid evidence might be destroyed without it, Jaynes said.


Policing experts say there's a good reason no-knocks are rarely used.

Related: Louisville police's 'no-knock' warrants most often targeted Black residents in the West End
 

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
41,140
When police do a no knock, do you think they A: do some research, and knew she had an armed boyfriend that might be there, or B: just go all willy-nilly to a house of a woman connected to drug trading?

That's the point of a no-knock. So the people inside have minimal amount of warning.
Police knew the ex boyfriend doesn't live atn the address. Her current boyfriend isn't connected to what they were investigating. He was not under police radar, nor did anything with a gun tgat would make police to seek no-knock warrant.

In addition, the warrant was obtained under false pretences.
 

Gordon_R

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
20,817
Federal charges laid against several officers:
Attorney General Merrick Garland announced the new charges. He said the officers were being charged with civil rights offenses, unlawful conspiracy, unconstitutional use of force and obstruction.

Mr Garland added that three of the officers - all but Mr Hankinson - had been charged with falsification of a search warrant.

Mr Hankinson is charged with using excessive force when he opened fire during the raid.
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,823
Last edited:
Top