300k encoding process delivers a good quality video
hahahahahaha seriously 300K encoding (i laugh it is mpeg 2 like (old tech) DSTV coz that will be even worse, if they actually get it to mpeg 4 (H264 2 big thumbs up) then it will be a better format than their DSTV satellite broadcast but look crap because of the 300K bitrate).
Think most people should rather stick to watching Youtube or Google video. At least that way you get to watch something worth your time. I still can't get over how crap that is, 300K, maybe they are expecting people to watch it on their cellphones. Thats it, its prob not for computers at all.
They may even find it hard to impress the good old boys like Jan van Riebeeck, who never new what a PC or internet was, with stuff like that .
However, that is not bad as an extra service, to preview content and such. But to give it the hype and flash it is getting is quite funny. Its like our local broadband providers. They give you these fairly fast lines like the current 4 meg lines but then you get 384 (or less) speeds when browsing (because of shaping and crap service). Tell it like it is. I mean look at the quote above "delivers a good quality video". Compared to what??????? The first digital cameras to come out maybe???? anyone remember those

People who don't know or understand the technical side of technology will expect "good quality video" because they read it, but they won't be getting it.
O well for someone who doesn't like moaning, I've moaned a lot here, sorry guys, but this was a bit funny, still it's a very small step in the right direction non the less.