- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Messages
- 66,740
Telkom's problem. They wanna advertise it as 3GB that's what'l get put into comparisons like this. It's retarded to advertise 3GBs and give double that (not complaining hereWell, the cap's actually 6GB on the doBroadband 3, so it should be 27, not 55...
Telkom's problem. They wanna advertise it as 3GB that's what'l get put into comparisons like this. It's retarded to advertise 3GBs and give double that (not complaining here). Why not just advertise 6 in the first place, makes no sense to me..
If only Telkom could implement the relaxed capping policy on Do1, it will sell like hotcakes.What would make me REALLY HAPPY is if I could get my ADSL line on do1 and buy lots of cheap international bandwidth from Neotel as an ISP. The 1GB is frustrating everybody, sort that out and lots of people will be alot happier.
Still not enough for me. Next step should be an international cap in the double digits at least.If only Telkom could implement the relaxed capping policy on Do1, it will sell like hotcakes.
If only.....
If only Telkom could implement the relaxed capping policy on Do1, it will sell like hotcakes.
If only.....
Those who qualify as previously disadvantaged?What's R59 a month extra for 3GB? Who in the world would get do1 anyway?
I'm moving to do2. My maths is pretty good and R50 extra for 3 extra GBs sounds good.Those who qualify as previously disadvantaged?
EDIT: ...and FEO
Hi Garyvdhhow do I figure out the formula to arrive at that Cost/Mbps/GB ratio?
sorry... I;m dof when it comes to maths![]()