Gatecrasher
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2005
- Messages
- 6,278
Well, even rpm says that Iburst was the fastest during the testing, 777kbps.
But he didn't put that in the report. Clearly this data carries very little weight when someone out of signal range is submitting a gazillion +-0kbps tests continously throughout the 7 day testing period.
What rpm does say in his report is: Stay away until the service improves. Who should get it? Only those who cannot get another service.
Unfortunatley this just does not allign with the vast majority of user comments on this forum. For that reason, rpm should be seriously questioning the validity of his data, and the conclusions he has reached.
But he didn't put that in the report. Clearly this data carries very little weight when someone out of signal range is submitting a gazillion +-0kbps tests continously throughout the 7 day testing period.
What rpm does say in his report is: Stay away until the service improves. Who should get it? Only those who cannot get another service.
Unfortunatley this just does not allign with the vast majority of user comments on this forum. For that reason, rpm should be seriously questioning the validity of his data, and the conclusions he has reached.