why is this even tolerated? or is because she is part of the club,
the same club that buys another BMW when the current one runs out of petrol?
Ostrich syndrome. Parliament too embarrassed to admit that they made a monumental cock-up.
And deluded. Still maintains the judgements don't mean she's incapable. Claims it's the same as judges making mistakes. Anyone else would resign but not this one.Stunningly incompetent.
I doubt parliament has enough brain cells to realise they made a monumental cock-up.
Upton Sinclair ran for Governor of California in the 1930s, and the coverage he received from newspapers was unsympathetic. Yet, in 1934 some California papers published installments from his forthcoming book about the ill-fated campaign titled “I, Candidate for Governor, and How I Got Licked”. Emphasis added to excerpts by QI:
I used to say to our audiences: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”
In 1893 a newspaper in Lincoln, Nebraska printed a thematically related statement written by populist politician William Jennings Bryan:
It is useless to argue with a man whose opinion is based upon a personal or pecuniary interest; the only way to deal with him is to outvote him.
Another day, another loss, another costs order:
![]()
PP's report on the Financial Services Board set aside
The Pretoria High Court set aside Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane's report on the Financial Services Board.enca.com
Not a new problem: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/11/30/salary/
(most losses)
weekend special hogging limelight briefly. Wendy Hughes - hmm - are we going to discuss merits of this judge or not?![]()
Another court blow for Mkhwebane in Des van Rooyen/Gupta saga
Des van Rooyen has had Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s report that found he lied to Parliament over meeting the controversial fugitive Gupta family overturned.www.iol.co.za
North Gauteng High Court Judge Wendy Hughes on Monday, found that Mkhwebane’s 2018 report that ordered former president Jacob Zuma to take action against Van Rooyen was factually unfounded, irrational and unlawful.
Wendy Hughes - hmm - are we going to discuss merits of this judge or not?
Don't we all wonder sometimes if judiciary is for sale or not? Is it not applicable here?Why?
Don't we all wonder sometimes if judiciary is for sale or not? Is it not applicable here?
Come on, are we not in agreement there are problems with judiciary? Why not this time?What are you implying, spit it out and I'll answer.
I'm beginning to wonder about those claims of the eff being an anc sideshow setup to achieve their goals, the gov, judiciary, sahrc etc give the eff a free pass.
andEven the judiciary is going to schit.