^That's very general. Property is obviously location specific but I just can't see how a positively geared property can be worse than investments especially if you've put very little down as a deposit.
I you have little deposit and go for a bond, remember that after 20 years your property will have cost you 3x the purchase price. With at most 50% capital gains. In real terms that is no gain at all. With an investment you get far better returns and if your compound that over 20 years, that becomes a huge investment. I have a warehouse that has a tenant and I earn R10K nett per month. It is fully paid up, but has had 0% capital growth in the last 5 years. I am seriously considering selling it and investing it money....
But if you have a cash positive property why would you pay it off at all? I don't mean to sound presumptious but why not just refinance the property so you're breaking even and then invest that while still maintaining ownership of the property?
But if you have a cash positive property why would you pay it off at all? I don't mean to sound presumptious but why not just refinance the property so you're breaking even and then invest that while still maintaining ownership of the property?
Because the tax advantage of the new loan is not allowed by SARS.
Originally Posted by eehellfire
Bit of a resurrect, but anyway...
If you have an access bond on the rented property, just keep withdrawing capital amount from the bond. In this way, you keep the interest portion of your monthly instalment maximised, and thus maximise your tax benefit.
You can just deposit that capital amount into your other bond.
Well, not a new loan but just getting the accumulated capital out of the property and using that as a deposit on a new one or use the cashflow generated by the first to finance the shortfall on the second. I'm not a tax expert and I'd advise the OP to seek the proper advice before doing anything but letting cash sit in a mortgage whereas it could be working harder somewhere else seems counterproductive to me.
This is more along the lines of what I meant
If you now claim the total interest on your tax it is tax evasion, and illegal.
SARS will not recognise any new loan you take out on your rental property for deduction as it was not required to procure the income producing product (house). The monthly interest on your current bond on the rental property IS deductible
For tax purposes, only the interest (not capital) on the loan is deductible against income. Additionally you must take into account other costs which are deductible. Rates, Levies, insurance, security etc etc.
Also SARS will not recognise the new loan against your income as it was not required to procure the income producing property.
So if I have a second property - paid off etc - and decide to take a bond to renovate and repair it, they won't see it as required and I can't claim tax ?
So if I have a second property - paid off etc - and decide to take a bond to renovate and repair it, they won't see it as required and I can't claim tax ?
What about listed property funds? That takes advantage of gearing, indirectly yeah?Its a investment that is much more work to manage generally, but then again its a geared investment*, which is much harder to do with shares... I do both.
*Talking about renting out a property with a bond on it.