I took my SLR to the U2 show. They seemed to be concerned about whether it had a zoom lens or not. I pointed out that it was not a zoom (was a fixed 50mm) and they were quite happy to let me through...
Who cares?!?
Why would you wanna go see those old losers anyhow?
I'm also paying several hundreds of rands to enjoy the show and twits popping off their flashes left right and centre gets annoying. Since most DSLRs come equipped with a flash I'd be happy to see all cameras banned from the event.WTF is wrong with these people? What exactly do they think they're protecting themselves from? If anything, allowing people to bring their cameras gives them a bigger pool of photos to choose from, from people who don't necessarily expect to get paid for it. I understand not allowing tripods, flash or broadcast equipment, but when I pay several hundred bucks to see a band, I want to have some good printed/digital memories from it to show my mates.
It's not the cameras, its the flashes.[]http://184.72.239.143/mu/2987ac68-82a4-05f3.jpg[/IMG]
Anyone else got some nice pics they took whilst annoying bwana with their cameras? ;0)
I'm also paying several hundreds of rands to enjoy the show and twits popping off their flashes left right and centre gets annoying. Since most DSLRs come equipped with a flash I'd be happy to see all cameras banned from the event.
Does the guy at the gate? I'm sure you understand that blanket rules have to be made and prohibiting all cameras is the obvious way.I'm sure you know I don't use flash![]()
Does the guy at the gate? I'm sure you understand that blanket rules have to be made and prohibiting all cameras is the obvious way.
BTW - I've had to caution journalists against using a flash at concerts.