Cape Party launches bid for Western Cape independence

Sepeng

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Messages
2,736
It might also be raining actually since its going into the rainy season now...

Ok yeah, that plan has some flaws... fsck it.
And then the humidity in December, and as everyone knows, you don't invade KZN in the summer.
Well actually that's not true - us vaalies love invading KZN in the summer.
OK fine, KZN can stay. But sort the Sharks out. Or else.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,635
And then the humidity in December, and as everyone knows, you don't invade KZN in the summer.
Well actually that's not true - us vaalies love invading KZN in the summer.
OK fine, KZN can stay. But sort the Sharks out. Or else.

When you say sort out the Sharks? Do you mean actually make them perform properly and always win like they should?

If so, we've been trying, but its the humidity and rain that gets in the way... they get lazy.
 

F1 Fan

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
5,340
Because they don't own it.

Eskom owns Koeberg.
Portnet owns the Port of Cape Town.
Cape Town International Airport is owned by ACSA which is majority owned by the South African Government.
The National Road Network is owned by SANRAL.
The railroads are owned by PRASA and Transnet Freight.


How much do they pay and receive?
Better be a lot because they're going to be paying to use all that South African-owned infrastructure.


Or do they think they'll just be taking all of that?
Im not sure what point you are trying to make to be honest. All these entities are owned by government based on tax contributions from the provinces including WC. So that ownership should transfer.

No doubt, it will be super difficult and complex to achieve. But the government isn't giving hand outs to WC.
 

krycor

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
18,546
Wait till they decide who can be a citizen.. and who is not.

That’s when **** gets real and civil wars start because the 1/2 the population is not from here originally.. and no matter how you try an carve it out, it gets bad fast.

So yah.. usual BS ideas before reality kicks in and majority people realize they going backwards and being led by the same BS artists of the past. well history does love repeating itself hey.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,635
Im not sure what point you are trying to make to be honest. All these entities are owned by government based on tax contributions from the provinces including WC. So that ownership should transfer.

No doubt, it will be super difficult and complex to achieve. But the government isn't giving hand outs to WC.

Ok, then if you're going to play it that way, then what percentage of taxpayers come from the WC, they can get all those entities for that percentage discount...
 

Vorastra

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
14,229
Im not sure what point you are trying to make to be honest.
The point is that independence is feking stupid.

All these entities are owned by government based on tax contributions from the provinces including WC.
And yet, still owned by the government of ZA that will no longer be the WC's government? Ownership doesn't change.
If I stop paying the bank for my car, the car still belongs to the bank.

So that ownership should transfer.
Not even remotely how that will work.
Pay up, betch. :cool:

No doubt, it will be super difficult and complex to achieve. But the government isn't giving hand outs to WC.
No problem, you can rent all those things I've listed above from South Africa. South Africa looks forward to doing crippling business with the Independent State of WC.
 
Last edited:

F1 Fan

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
5,340
Ok, then if you're going to play it that way, then what percentage of taxpayers come from the WC, they can get all those entities for that percentage discount...
I mean thats prob one approach right...

My point is, everyone is picking holes in why this shoudn't work, and then in other threads, they bitch and moan about how the ANC is useless. WC has better chances of succeeding and surviving compared to hoping the ANC turns whole of SA around, in my opinion.

I would think Gauteng and KZN would want to succeed as well, giving that the 3 major cities basically fund the gravy train for the country. The only difference for us is we have potential to vote for other parties
 

Sepeng

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Messages
2,736
When you say sort out the Sharks? Do you mean actually make them perform properly and always win like they should?

If so, we've been trying, but its the humidity and rain that gets in the way... they get lazy.
Then get on importing more Free State folk, that's worked for us before!
 

F1 Fan

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
5,340
The point is that independence is feking stupid.


And yet, still owned by the government of ZA that will no longer be the WC's government? Ownership doesn't change.
If I stop paying the bank for my car, the car still belongs to the bank.


Not even remotely how that will work.
Pay up, betch. :cool:


No problem, you can rent all those things I've listed above from South Africa.

Legal entities with shareholding strcutures, but ownership doesn't change? Ok then.
 

WollieVerstege

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
1,903
Im not sure what point you are trying to make to be honest. All these entities are owned by government based on tax contributions from the provinces including WC. So that ownership should transfer.

No doubt, it will be super difficult and complex to achieve. But the government isn't giving hand outs to WC.
Technically no. They are owned by private companies of which the Government is just a shareholder, i.e. SOE's
So the things mentioned are assets on their balance sheets and cannot just be given away, somebody is going to have to buy it from them, with money we get from where - who knows.
Furthermore most of the corporate tax payers will run for the hills, so you can ignore the amount of taxes that the WC collects from them
 

Vorastra

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
14,229
Legal entities with shareholding strcutures, but ownership doesn't change? Ok then.
How does that apply to my comment.
What government entity, that I've listed, will the Independent State of WC be a shareholder in?
 

F1 Fan

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
5,340
Technically no. They are owned by private companies of which the Government is just a shareholder, i.e. SOE's
So the things mentioned are assets on their balance sheets and cannot just be given away, somebody is going to have to buy it from them, with money we get from where - who knows.
Furthermore most of the corporate tax payers will run for the hills, so you can ignore the amount of taxes that the WC collects from them
Fair point, other entities are involved as well. Im not an expert on how this will all work, but I definitely think it warrants investigation.

Why would corporates flee?
 

Creag

The Boar's Rock
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
43,534
No comment by lexity yet?! :eek:

And no I am not tagging him/her. I do not want any infractions :cautious:
 

Genisys

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
11,220
If this happens, how long do we give it before they come back crying wolf?
 

WollieVerstege

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
1,903
Fair point, other entities are involved as well. Im not an expert on how this will all work, but I definitely think it warrants investigation.

Why would corporates flee?
List is quite long, but some of the issues that I have looked at is:
  • Membership of SADC and AU - SA companies benefits massively from this membership and there is no guarantee the IWC will be allowed to stay in these organisations. Likewise also with BRICS.
  • IWC will have no international relations or trade treaties which companies rely on, especially those that have an international presence.
  • Questions on taxation, regardless of what the independence guys say, a lot of taxes will have to be extracted from somewhere.
  • Retaliation on their businesses remaining in SA from SA/ANC.
  • Some critical business relationships will become international relationships overnight. Think about the relationships between large financial institutions based in the WC and mining houses for instance.
  • Establishment of a reserve fund/bank, and associated monetary policy, and the risks to market liquidity.
  • An IWC will not block them from doing business here in any case, so stick with what you know in SA.
  • Political instability.
In the end there will have to be 100% certainty about what an IWC will look like or they will walk. As bad as the rest of SA is, from a business perspective, it is still the larger and more lucrative market.
 

Scooby_Doo

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2005
Messages
9,087
I must be blind, I see no amounts received or paid in the BT article nor the Cape Independence article linked. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
What about the rest of my comment.


Three of the provinces of South Africa contributed 77.8% of the total tax revenue: Gauteng (49.0%), Western Cape (15.5%), and KwaZulu-Natal (13.3%). The provinces with the smallest contributions were the Northern Cape (1.3%), followed by Free State (3.2%) and North West (3.3%) [1]

I am not going to pretend that I know how a split would happen, but I disagree with the statement that the WC should pay for the assets outright when in fact the taxpayers have been contributing.
 
Top