Cape Times editor fired after Joemat-Pettersson report

Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,758
Cape Times editor Alide Dasnois has been removed from her post by her newspaper group's controlling shareholder.

It is understood that Dasnois was informed by Sekunjalo Consortium executive chairperson Iqbal Survé of her removal on Friday, and that some reporters for the Cape Times were moved to tears by the removal.

Sekunjalo Consortium is the controlling shareholder of Independent Newspapers, which owns the Cape Times among other newspapers in the country.

Dasnois was told on Friday not to return to work and Monday's edition of the newspaper will be edited by Chris Whitfield, the group editor in the Western Cape.

Dasnois was apparently offered redeployment in another capacity within the company.

She declined to comment on Sunday, except to say: "I am in the process of seeking legal advice."

It is not clear why Dasnois was fired.

Front page of Madonsela findings
However, her removal from office coincides with the newspaper publishing a front-page article on public protector Thuli Madonsela's finding that Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson was guilty of maladministration, as well as improper and unethical conduct in the irregular awarding of an R800-million tender to a Sekunjalo subsidiary to manage the state's fishery vessels.

In a letter to Whitfield dated December 7, lawyers for Sekunjalo Investments referred specifically to the Cape Times article of the previous day.

"Our instructions are that you have reported extensively over the past two years on the allegations by the disappointed bidder SMIT Amandla [Marine] and Mr Pieter van Dalen of the Democratic Alliance regarding Sekunjalo's role in the award of the tender for management of the research and patrol vessels of the department of agriculture, forestry and fisheries [DAFF]​.

"Our client has instructed us to record the following:

"1. It has been alleged that Sekunjalo Investments Ltd is guilty of corruption; that it had misled and/or defrauded DAFF; that it lacked the experience and expertise to undertake the management of the research and patrol vessels of DAFF; etc.

2. These allegations have been thoroughly debunked.

3. The report by the public protector clears Sekunjalo of all wrongdoing.

4. It would have been appropriate, after months and months of sustained attacks on the integrity of Sekunjalo, if the Cape Times had published on its front page the more accurate articles which were buried on page 18 of Business Report of December 6 2013, that Sekunjalo had been vindicated, and that the company demanded an apology."

http://mg.co.za/article/2013-12-08-alide-dasnois-removed-as-cape-times-editor
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,630
Ahhhh so Iqbal starts his little campaign it seems.

Wonder how he will try and explain this one away.
 

ant_man

Expert Member
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
1,684
This is after he had a double spread in the Cape times saying that the Cape times will be run as an independent news source.
 

Garson007

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
11,838
This is after he had a double spread in the Cape times saying that the Cape times will be run as an independent news source.
Shareholders making decisions - instead of the government - is independent. When the two overlap is only a coincidence.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,630
What the controlling shareholder wants you to read...

Which nobody will do once Iqbal gets done.. and then he'll swear at all of us racist pig dogs who have a vendetta against him.
 

techead

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
12,188
so that is the end of the cape times then? they report on corruption and you get told not to bother coming into the office the next day.

disgusting
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
Why was Cape Times editor dismissed? : SANEF

The reasons behind the sudden dismissal of Cape Times editor Alide Dasnois must be revealed, the SA National Editors' Forum (Sanef) said on Monday.

"In the absence of a statement from the Cape Times or Sekunjalo Holdings -- the new owner of Independent Newspapers -- explaining why Dasnois was suddenly dismissed, Sanef is concerned whether it has any connection with the publication of a story in the newspaper on Friday," it said in a statement.

On Sunday, the Mail&Guardian reported that Dasnois was informed of her removal on Friday, and that Monday's edition of the newspaper would be edited by Western Cape group editor Chris Whitfield.

"I am in the process of seeking legal advice," Dasnois told the Mail&Guardian at the time.

The story in question, which appeared in the newspaper on Friday, apparently dealt with a finding by the Public Protector that the awarding of a fisheries tender by the agriculture, forestry, and fisheries department to Sekunjalo Marine Services Consortium was "improper".

The consortium is a subsidiary of Sekunjalo Holdings.

Sekunjalo Investments subsequently sent a lawyer's letter to the Cape Times claiming the story was inaccurate.

The company also apparently threatened to sue the newspaper, editor, and journalist involved for damages.

Sanef said it was "shocked" and "concerned" at the situation.

"Sanef condemns any interference with the independence of editors and journalists when carrying out their duties. We call on Sekunjalo Holdings to clarify the issues relating to Dasnois's sudden dismissal without delay and to desist from making threats against the staffers."

Comment from Independent Newspapers was not immediately available.


Source : Sapa /ml/tk/jk/cls
Date : 09 Dec 2013 11:18
 

akescpt

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
22,459
this calls into question the articles of all their newspapers. if editors dont have the last say its nothing more than the parent companies mouth piece.
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
Dasnois considers legal action

Former Cape Times editor Alide Dasnois is considering legal action following her dismissal from the newspaper, she said on Wednesday.

"In my opinion, I was unfairly dismissed from my position at the Cape Times," she said.

"I have taken legal advice and we are considering referring a dispute to the CCMA [Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration] or the Labour Court."

It was reported on Friday that Dasnois had been fired and that she was informed of her dismissal the same day.

Independent News and Media SA (INMSA) chairman Iqbal Surve said in a statement on Monday that Dasnois had not been fired, but had been offered alternative positions in the company.

"Ms Dasnois was not fired," Surve said in a statement.

"When she was removed as executive editor she was offered various other positions in the company to which I still await a response."

He was responding to concerns voiced by the SA National Editors' Forum (Sanef) and Cape Town Press Club that Dasnois may have been fired after the newspaper ran a story on Friday which painted Sekunjalo in a negative light.

The story was about a Public Protector finding that the awarding of a fisheries tender by the agriculture, forestry, and fisheries department to Sekunjalo Marine Services Consortium was improper.

The consortium is a subsidiary of Sekunjalo Holdings and acquired a controlling share in INMSA earlier this year.

Sekunjalo Investments subsequently sent a lawyer's letter to the Cape Times stating that the story was inaccurate.

Surve said that since Sekunjalo had joined INMSA, it had been clear that there would be changes in Independent's print titles and other platforms to boost competitiveness and ensure sustainability.

"While it is not the practice to discuss staff changes in public because of how it could affect the integrity and privacy of my employees, the sustained campaign to vilify me and INMSA has forced me to outline some aspects of the strategic repositioning of the business publicly," he said.

He categorically denied that Dasnois's replacement was due to the fisheries tender story.

"Given the distorted picture now being peddled in the public about the motives for the changes at the paper, it is necessary to remind everyone of the wholly unsatisfactory sales performance of that title over the last few years."

Surve said the Cape Times's compounded loss of sales, between 2008 and 2012, amounted to 28 percent.

"Under these circumstances, the new owners of the paper have every right and an obligation to make changes aimed at arresting the situation."

He said Gasant Abarder had been appointed editor of the Cape Times in place of Dasnois.

"In conclusion, I want to state for the record that I, together with the leadership of this group, remain fully committed to the editorial independence of all our journalists and editors."

On Monday, the staff of the Cape Times issued a statement indicating their "deep anger and protest" at the dismissal of Dasnois.

"Although Dasnois was told three days ago [Friday] not to return to work, staff have still not been officially informed of the reason for her sudden dismissal," they said in the statement.

"The staff's concern, from the sequence of events, is that the new owners of the newspaper, Sekunjalo Independent Media, are attempting to compromise the editorial independence of the Cape Times."

If this was the case, it was a direct threat to the standing and independence of the newspaper.

"Dasnois has asked staff to continue with normal production of the newspaper, especially this week, as a sign of respect to Nelson Mandela. We respect her wishes," staff said.

"We will be in discussion and decide on appropriate action for next week. Editorial staff at The Cape Argus and The Star support this statement."


Source : Sapa /aw/ks/cls/aa
Date : 11 Dec 2013 18:18
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
Surve pens letter to Independent staff

Independent News and Media SA (INMSA) chair Iqbal Surve has penned a year-end letter to staff, detailing reasons for the removal of Cape Times editor Alide Dasnois.

This follows Dasnois's confirmation on Wednesday that she was considering legal action following her dismissal from the newspaper.

In his year-end letter, Surve said Dasnois was reprimanded for not leading with the news of former president Nelson Mandela in its Friday edition.

Mandela died at his home in Houghton, Johannesburg, last Thursday, at the age of 95.

He denied that Dasnois was dismissed, and said she had been redeployed to another editorial position.

It was reported on Friday that Dasnois had been fired and that she was informed of her dismissal the same day.

Surve said in a statement on Monday that Dasnois had not been fired, but had been offered alternative positions in the company.

He was responding to concerns voiced by the SA National Editors' Forum (Sanef) and Cape Town Press Club that Dasnois may have been fired after the newspaper ran a story on Friday which painted Sekunjalo in a negative light.

The story was about a Public Protector finding that the awarding of a fisheries tender by the agriculture, forestry, and fisheries department to Sekunjalo Marine Services Consortium was improper.

The consortium is a subsidiary of Sekunjalo Holdings and acquired a controlling share in INMSA earlier this year. Surve also chairs Sekunjalo.

Last Thursday, he accused rival Times Media Group of a "dirty tricks" campaign to rob his group of revenue and readers, and laid criminal charges against one of its editors and a reporter.

The Sunday Times also ran with the Public Protector's provisional report on the fisheries tender.

Here follows the full, unabridged text of Surve's letter:

"It has been customary for me to address all our employees of the greater Sekunjalo Group through a year-end letter from the office of the chairman.

"It is my privilege and honour to write this letter as the executive chairman of Independent Media South Africa (INMSA). My annual year-end letter does not normally address specific employee operational issues, but in this instance I have elected to do so since we find ourselves in the midst of a challenging time.

"The past few days have been very difficult for our company, INMSA. Last week, our beloved Madiba passed on. Many of us, including myself, who had personal relationships with Madiba, have spent this week reflecting on his noble values and commitment to a free and non-racial society.

"These trying days also coincided with the start of our strategic session in Cape Town and the planned sessions in Durban and Johannesburg.

"We had a productive and open discussion on the first day in Cape Town, with the top 40 managers. Out of respect for Madiba, we decided to postpone the sessions planned for Durban and Johannesburg to the new year.

"On Thursday evening, on being informed about Madiba, the editorial leadership and management present in Cape Town planned that the group's titles would dedicate the editorial to Madiba for the next morning's publications.

"All editorial teams were encouraged to immediately leave the strategic session for their newsrooms to ensure that the news focus for the following day would be on Madiba and to communicate the plan nationally to the group's newsrooms.

"There was excitement that Independent would have a uniform editorial position on the front and leading pages of all its major publications on Friday.

"This would give our readers the opportunity to learn first-hand information of what had transpired during Madiba's last few hours with family and close friends but more importantly to celebrate the magnificent legacy Madiba left for all of us.

"It therefore goes without saying that on Friday, the senior executives of INMSA were shocked to discover that the only major Independent title that failed to lead editorially with Madiba's passing was the Cape Times.

"I am at liberty to disclose to you that the senior management of Independent had in any event already planned to have a meeting after the strategic session to discuss with Ms Dasnois the performance of the Cape Times and her role in the group.

"The need to improve the performance of the Cape Times and to position Ms Dasnois in a role that played to her passions and strengths had been contemplated for quite some time prior to last week's events.

"At this meeting, in addition to dealing with our plans for her future role in the group, Ms Dasnois was asked by the CEO Tony Howard to explain the failure to lead the newspaper with the Madiba story and her response was that she did not have enough resources to have done so.

"This excuse was not accepted by all present on the basis that all the other newspapers in Independent (except for two smaller regional publications), had the same tight deadlines and in some instances had had fewer resources, and yet they had still been able to lead editorially with the Madiba story.

"Whilst many of our major titles produced wraparounds it was expected that they would have page one lead editorials on Madiba. The Cape Times did produce a wraparound, which in some places was only put into the newspaper as an insert.

"There was nothing about Madiba on the front page or other leading pages.

"It is my considered view, and that of the senior executive team of Independent present at the time with Ms Dasnois, that the failure of the Cape Times to lead with such a momentous event, was an affront to the dignity of Madiba and a disservice to our readers.

[continues...]
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
"The Cape Times subsequently produced a fitting tribute to Madiba this week.

"I wish to thank all of the members of the Cape Town newsroom for their professionalism from Sunday evening in producing an outstanding newspaper.

"Until now the senior management present at the meeting with Ms Dasnois (including myself, CEO Tony Howard, Regional Manager Sandy Naude and executive Chris Whitfield) have remained silent on the details of what transpired at the meeting in relation to Ms Dasnois, out of respect for the privacy and confidentiality by which every good employee/employer relationship is governed.

"Today we learnt that Ms Dasnois has decided to deal with this matter publicly via online media and to the exclusion of the normal private communication channel between employer and employee.

"Regrettably Ms Dasnois has left us with no choice but to deal with the matter more publicly than we would have preferred.

"I feel that I have to balance the interests of our company, INMSA, and its reputation for editorial independence and integrity versus the privacy and confidentiality normally applicable in relation to the employee-employer relationship.

"Over the last few days, the media has reported claims that Ms Dasnois' discussions with senior management constituted interference with her editorial independence.

"She has further claimed that she was dismissed.

"These allegations are made without a shred of evidence to substantiate these claims.

"It has been suggested by Ms Dasnois and the media that her redeployment was related to an article she published on the front page of the Cape Times on 6 December 2013.

"Nothing could be further from the truth. I can state categorically that neither myself nor any senior member of the executive team discussed this article on the lead page with her.

"One of the reasons for requesting Ms Dasnois to move to another editorial position related to positioning her in a role that played more to her passions and strengths.

"Ms Dasnois' conduct in not leading with the Madiba editorial accelerated this request for her redeployment.

"For the record, in the interests of the company, I took time on Sunday for a further meeting with Ms Dasnois to attempt to convince her to reconsider her decision not to take up the new role.

"Despite this attempt, I have still had no formal communication from Ms Dasnois, other than what I have read in the media.

"Since there is some time before we meet at the strategic sessions next year and you hear from me personally, I would like to provide you with my thoughts and views on the issue of editorial independence and job security since these issues are being raised as a consequence of the publicity about the company in the past few days.

"I want to be clear and categorical. I want to assure all staff of my sincere commitment to the editorial independence of this group and the right of its journalist to do their work without fear or favour.

"This means no journalist has to fear when writing a story if one or more of the companies in Sekunjalo Group is involved. I do not expect special favours or puff pieces to be written by any journalists. All our stories must adhere to the highest standards required.

"This means they have to be balanced, fair and accurate. What they can't be is one sided, inaccurate and prejudicial. I have always valued the principles of transparency, fairness and independence. More importantly, in our quest for fairness, we should give everyone an opportunity of the right of reply.

"As executive chairman, I will uphold these values and expect all of our journalists and editors to do the same regardless of which story it is they cover.

"The board of directors of INMSA has commissioned the drafting of an editorial charter as well the creation of advisory boards (nationally and regionally), which will guide the company on these issues on a daily basis as journalists go about doing their work.

"I also want to debunk the myth that I will frown upon and act against journalists who ask tough questions and probe issues of malfeasance involving politicians, business people and other components of our society.

"I believe that our young democracy is better served when those in power and those that have substantial resources are held to account by stories that seek the truth, that tells the whole story and that gives everyone affected a fair chance and opportunity to state their case.

"On a personal note, no journalist need fear legal action from me if they write about me. In instances where I feel aggrieved about how I was portrayed, I will follow the traditional procedures which are to be followed. I will write letter of complaints and insist on my right to reply.

"Finally, in response to discussions with some of our editors, I need to address the issue of performance and suitability of roles as it relates to editors and job security.

"Again I would have preferred to do this at the strategic sessions which were unfortunately postponed as explained earlier.

"For any business to remain viable it needs to be profitable and successful. The board of directors has to appoint the right people to the positions of management to drive this profitability and success. It is the prerogative of the board of directors to appoint senior management in any organisation.

"I want to be unequivocal and unapologetic about appointing senior executives and editors, as this responsibility rests with the board.

"As a businessman that serves on many international boards, I understand fully that the success of a business is multi-factorial.

"All of these factors have to be considered along with editorial leadership in driving the success of a title. At a time when newspapers are facing a challenging environment, and the sustainability of the business model and security of the employees is at stake, editors cannot be impervious about profitability and the success of their titles.

"Whilst profitability is a variable that would be taken into account when assessing performance of key managers and executives, it will not be the only variable.

"In my capacity as chairman of board remuneration committees, I have applied decisions in accordance with all rules, agreements and legally binding contracts when performance is assessed.

"I see no reason why Independent's employees, journalist or editors should be treated differently. In fact, from the feedback I have received so far, I think many would welcome such performance appraisal both as an incentive and as a measurement tool.

"I want to thank you for taking the time to read this letter since I have tried to convey my thoughts in an open and transparent manner which best serves the interests of our company, its employees, integrity and reputation.

"Without your valuable contribution, Independent would not be successful and would not have survived the difficult period over the last decade in the absence of the resources to invest in its growth and future.

"As custodian of this business, I will protect our reputation, our credibility and the wellbeing of all employees. This is a role I take seriously and will execute in the best interest of our company and the long-term sustainability of our business.

"As we approach the new year, we think about that all important resolution.

"My new year's resolution is simply to have the opportunity to meet with each of you individually. I hope that this is possible so that I may hear first-hand your views, ideas, concerns, fears and wishes on how best to grow INMSA into the most successful multimedia company in South Africa.

"I take this opportunity to wish you and your family and loved ones the very best for the festive season and year-end holidays.

"I hope that you have some rest (and fun), so that in the new year we are ready to take Independent to the next level in its growth trajectory as a truly South African multimedia company.

"Warm Regards

"Dr Iqbal Surve."


Source : Sapa /aa/hdw/cls
Date : 12 Dec 2013 12:44
 

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117

probably linked to this:

INDEPENDENT DECLINES TO COMMENT ON LAWSUIT: REPORT

Independent Newspapers on Saturday declined to comment on a report that an ANC businessman plans to sue the Sunday Independent for defamation of R1 billion.

"We are not making any comments," group executive editor Karima Brown told Sapa on Saturday.

Attorneys for information technology mogul Robert Gumede have already served the newspaper with a notice of intention to sue in the biggest defamation claim in South African history, the Saturday Star reported.

The notice said an article published on Gumede caused him "serious commercial and reputational damage".

The Sunday Independent published a report on March 2 headlined "ANC funder probed". The report claims that Gumede's JSE-listed IT firm, Gijima, is the subject of an investigation authorised by President Jacob Zuma.

The report alleges that Zuma signed a proclamation for the Special Investigating Unit to probe a tender awarded by the Department of Rural Development to Gumede's company.

The notice claims the report is defamatory and the headline sensational.

Source : Sapa /kn/mar
Date : 15 Mar 2014 11:25
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,605
DISMISSED EDITOR TURNS TO COURT

Dismissed Cape Times editor Alide Dasnois wIill approach the Labour Court following her dismissal, her lawyer said on Tuesday.

"The matter has been conciliated by the CCMA. We are now heading to the labour court," said lawyer Jason White.

Papers would be filed within a month, he said.

Dasnois contended she was fired after the newspaper published a front-page article on Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's finding against Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson.

It found that the minister was guilty of maladministration and improper and unethical conduct in the awarding of an R800 million tender to a Sekunjalo subsidiary to manage the state's fishery vessels.

Dasnois approached the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration following her dismissal in December last year.

The Cape Times is owned by Independent Newspapers, whose controlling shareholder is Sekunjalo Consortium.

In a year-end letter, Independent News and Media SA (INMSA) chairman Iqbal Survé said Dasnois was reprimanded for not leading the paper with the news about the death of former president Nelson Mandela.

Mandela died in December at his home in Houghton, Johannesburg, aged 95.

Alison Tilley of the Open Democracy Advice Centre said her organisation was helping with the case and was raising funds for Dasnois.

"We think this is a public interest issue. Employees in the workplace should be able to speak up and still be safe. We are hoping for a positive outcome for Alide," she said.

The matter also involved the right of journalists and editors on what to publish against what media owners want published, she said.

Independent Newspapers declined to comment and said the matter was an internal labour issue.


Source : Sapa /gm/ks/jje
Date : 09 Jul 2014 13:52
 
Top