riscbroker
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2006
- Messages
- 2,332
My insurance policy states, as I'm sure most do, that I should review the value of vehicles covered, on an annual basis. I have to assume that the value, amongst other criteria, influences the premium payable.
I have a car insured with a current (book) retail value of R43,200. This vehicle is however still valued (and has been since 2011) at R61,600 on my policy, my premiums presumably being calculated accordingly. Yes, I understand that it is my responsibility to review the value and inform whoever needs to be informed.
Since the insurance company bases payouts on values derived from the Mead and McGrouther/Transunion Data Digest, it seems a little disingenuous that the broker/underwriter/insurer should keep on collecting premiums based on a value that you will never realize in the event of loss. The insurer determines the payout in the event of loss, so patently has access to the current values. Why are these values then not adjusted annually by the insurer, apart from the obvious conclusion that this would impact premiums?
I have a car insured with a current (book) retail value of R43,200. This vehicle is however still valued (and has been since 2011) at R61,600 on my policy, my premiums presumably being calculated accordingly. Yes, I understand that it is my responsibility to review the value and inform whoever needs to be informed.
Since the insurance company bases payouts on values derived from the Mead and McGrouther/Transunion Data Digest, it seems a little disingenuous that the broker/underwriter/insurer should keep on collecting premiums based on a value that you will never realize in the event of loss. The insurer determines the payout in the event of loss, so patently has access to the current values. Why are these values then not adjusted annually by the insurer, apart from the obvious conclusion that this would impact premiums?