This is my last Car Magazine. I am soooo tired of their biased approach to VW that it makes me sick.
Every issue, has to be some car put up against A VW. why not a Renault vs Alfa? or Mazda vs Ford? No, its always everything vs VW.
And then we have to hear how wonderful the VW is...and rubbish. Even when the numbers show otherwise, they will find some stupid way of praising the VW. Or instead of proper feedback about a car we get some chick (no offence) saying "could not find a comfortable seating position" i mean wth??
Anything not to say something bad about the VW.
Take hot-hatch shootout. The Renault and a few others ran circles around the Golf V - yet they still gana gana'd on about the VW this and that.
Then we have the Peugueot cc vs Eos cc. The Peugeot looked better on paper, looked better in photos - and the idiots said the VW won accross the board??
And today, today finished me. They put the Golf 6 against the Mazda MPS - which was faster, yes maybe it didnt handle as well but they praised the Golf over and over again. Why even bother testing?
And the last straw : "The Mazda, at R 310 000, is R7000 more expensive...." IDIOTS!!! read your own pages people! - the Mazda is R310 000 and the VW is R317 000. How can the Mazda be more expensive? You just making up garbage now for fear you wont praise the VW.
They must get kickbacks from VW, sponsorships and/or free cars. Cause nothing could explain such outright biased reports.
And finally, the Golf 6 vs old Focus. I mean really people, how far will you stretch this to get your "freebies" from VW? The Focus was far older, why not compare apples with apples. Oh yes, cause you have an agenda with each test...
Thank goodness we have proper motoring people on Top Gear to give us a real review.
[/venting]
Every issue, has to be some car put up against A VW. why not a Renault vs Alfa? or Mazda vs Ford? No, its always everything vs VW.
And then we have to hear how wonderful the VW is...and rubbish. Even when the numbers show otherwise, they will find some stupid way of praising the VW. Or instead of proper feedback about a car we get some chick (no offence) saying "could not find a comfortable seating position" i mean wth??
Anything not to say something bad about the VW.
Take hot-hatch shootout. The Renault and a few others ran circles around the Golf V - yet they still gana gana'd on about the VW this and that.
Then we have the Peugueot cc vs Eos cc. The Peugeot looked better on paper, looked better in photos - and the idiots said the VW won accross the board??
And today, today finished me. They put the Golf 6 against the Mazda MPS - which was faster, yes maybe it didnt handle as well but they praised the Golf over and over again. Why even bother testing?
And the last straw : "The Mazda, at R 310 000, is R7000 more expensive...." IDIOTS!!! read your own pages people! - the Mazda is R310 000 and the VW is R317 000. How can the Mazda be more expensive? You just making up garbage now for fear you wont praise the VW.
They must get kickbacks from VW, sponsorships and/or free cars. Cause nothing could explain such outright biased reports.
And finally, the Golf 6 vs old Focus. I mean really people, how far will you stretch this to get your "freebies" from VW? The Focus was far older, why not compare apples with apples. Oh yes, cause you have an agenda with each test...
Thank goodness we have proper motoring people on Top Gear to give us a real review.
[/venting]