Cash strapped Tongaat Hulett puts over 14-000 jobs on the line

[Pegasus]

They may be white but they are just like Koko, Molefe, Gama and the others, having enough money has never stopped anyone, of course no one ever does corruption thinking the will be caught.

The reputational risk is not a problem because everyone thinks they'll get away with it, since they are in the private sector, this could have easily been an accounting irregularity, all monies paid back and life goes on.

They aren’t all white.

How do you get all of them on the same page. Have you worked with executives in corporate before?
They usually aren’t on the same page and don’t always see eye to eye.

 

[TheChamp]

They aren’t all white.

How do you get all of them on the same page. Have you worked with executives in corporate before?
They usually aren’t on the same page and don’t always see eye to eye.

They are the same, corrupt fatcats, you are just confused because you somehow thought they would never stoop to the Koko, Molefe and Gama levels.

 

[Pegasus]

They are the same, corrupt fatcats, you are just confused because you somehow thought they would never stoop to the Koko, Molefe and Gama levels.

So you haven’t actually worked with people at that level, or in corporate.

Just low level stupid eff type thinking from you.

 

[noxibox]

It's good, old fashioned corruption.

But we're always told corruption would go away if everything was run by private businesses.

CEO of the year South Africa talking about best goals

Interview with Peter Staude, CEO of Tongaat Hulett and CEO oft the year 2017 in South Africa. He talks about his personal strengths, his best goals for the company and the 63-years old CEO gives some insights in his personal capacity.

www.brainforce-ag.com

They'll probably rescind that now because he got caught.

 

[R13...]

CEO of the year South Africa talking about best goals

Interview with Peter Staude, CEO of Tongaat Hulett and CEO oft the year 2017 in South Africa. He talks about his personal strengths, his best goals for the company and the 63-years old CEO gives some insights in his personal capacity.

www.brainforce-ag.com

Not sure how he won that, I have heard that he was an all round ******* in one of his previous jobs. Suppose a lot of CEOs are a****oles.

Apparently once instructed staff at a retirement party not to mix black and white people because the white people are old school and wouldn't want to mix with black.

 

[TheChamp]

So you haven’t actually worked with people at that level, or in corporate.

Just low level stupid eff type thinking from you.

Would they have been less corrupt if I worked with them?

 

[noxibox]

How do you get all of them on the same page. Have you worked with executives in corporate before?
They usually aren’t on the same page and don’t always see eye to eye.

Usually and don't always? Which is it? Anyway complete rubbish to claim executives usually disagree and fight with each other.

If executives in a company are always fighting each other then you've got an infighting situation which is also ultimately bad for the company and sooner or later the company will exhibit the consequences. The board will step in and terminate the troublemakers. Sometimes too late.

 

[Pegasus]

Would they have been less corrupt if I worked with them?

You are a bottom feeder and have no clue what they do. So you can't contribute anything of value here.

 

[Pegasus]

Usually and don't always? Which is it? Anyway complete rubbish to claim executives usually disagree and fight with each other.

If executives in a company are always fighting each other then you've got an infighting situation which is also ultimately bad for the company and sooner or later the company will exhibit the consequences. The board will step in and terminate the troublemakers. Sometimes too late.

It's not all out war I am talking about.

If you go through the names and see what departments they head up, you'll understand that people have different interests that are not always aligned.

Do you think they always agree on everything?

 

[TheChamp]

You are a bottom feeder and have no clue what they do. So you can't contribute anything of value here.

OK, listen properly now, your favourite people are corrupt, yes BEE made them do it but they are still corrupt.

 

[TheChamp]

It's not all out war I am talking about.

If you go through the names and see what departments they head up, you'll understand that people have different interests that are not always aligned.

Do you think they always agree on everything?

They seemingly agreed on the corruption, great minds always think alike.

 

[Pegasus]

OK, listen properly now, your favourite people are corrupt, yes BEE made them do it but they are still corrupt.

Who are my favourite people?
What are you actually on about here? You EFF types really are not bright at all.

 

[Pegasus]

They seemingly agreed on the corruption, great minds always think alike.

Yes twit, but how did it come to pass is the question I have.

You have no intelligent answer.

 

[Creag]

The farmers bear the brunt of this mother-lode of debt

 

[ToxicBunny]

Yes twit, but how did it come to pass is the question I have.

You have no intelligent answer.

Its very easy in how this came to pass... They slowly but surely co-opted each member of this corruption and fraud.. The amount of money being waved in front of them was too enticing.

And the whole lot should be chucked in chookie for a bloody long time for risking 14000 peoples livelihoods all for a few extra ronds in their back pocket.

 

[TheChamp]

Yes twit, but how did it come to pass is the question I have.

You have no intelligent answer.

Because everyone was united in the corruption, just like in all corruption cases, there's nothing exceptional or confusing about this case case.

 

[TheChamp]

The farmers bear the brunt of this mother-lode of debt

And the workers.

 

[Pegasus]

Its very easy in how this came to pass... They slowly but surely co-opted each member of this corruption and fraud.. The amount of money being waved in front of them was too enticing.

And the whole lot should be chucked in chookie for a bloody long time for risking 14000 peoples livelihoods all for a few extra ronds in their back pocket.

If you were one of those, would you go along with it?

 

[Pegasus]

Because everyone was united in the corruption, just like in all corruption cases, there's nothing exceptional or confusing about this case case.

Take me through the "How". Step by step please.

 

[ToxicBunny]

If you were one of those, would you go along with it?

I have no idea how much money was waved in front of them, and also whether there were structural issues within the entity and these "execs" were bleeding the entity for as much as possible before it collapsed or any of the pertinent details.

But what I am saying is that its considerably easier to co-opt people with a few extra million a year in their back pocket than you seem to think.