CellC 4G argument

[sin_x]

Maybe a bit late, but still funny (and relevant).

http://www.dilbert.com/fast/2011-05-10/

 

[morkhans]

Is this one of those "emperor's new clothes" type threads? We can all stare in awe at the non-existent content.

 

[sin_x]

Is this one of those "emperor's new clothes" type threads? We can all stare in awe at the non-existent content.

Sorry, seems you have to login to see images.

Added the link now.

 

[morkhans]

Sorry, seems you have to login to see images.

Added the link now.

You can also do this:

by wrapping

around the full URL of the image.

 

[sin_x]

You can also do this:

by wrapping

around the full URL of the image.

Thanks, I did that, but it was not referencing the image, only the landing page.

 

[zahpat]

4Goodness sakes, lol good1

 

[ebendl]

Probably caused by the huge battles in the US, where they've also started branding HSPA+ as 4G (instead of only LTE and WiMax). CellC pretty much picked this up from them, I would think.

 

[Mike43110]

Though, according to the one board(can't remember the name, but was the same one that stated that only LTE-Advanced would be classified as 4G) HSPA+ is actually 4G, thanks to its use of different antenna standards than normal 4G

 

[ebendl]

Though, according to the one board(can't remember the name, but was the same one that stated that only LTE-Advanced would be classified as 4G) HSPA+ is actually 4G, thanks to its use of different antenna standards than normal 3G

You mean 3G?