Cesarean Delivery May Cause Epigenetic Changes In Babies DNA

Spizz

Goat Botherer
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
31,568
I've always been a bit shocked at the scale of cesarean sections carried out in South Africa for no other reason than so the doctor can keep regular hours and be home in time for dinner. It's a bit of a scandal and the misinformation out there fed by the medical profession means that people accept it and don't seem to mind, so what can you do? Still, it never fails to amaze me when a friend tells me that his baby is coming next Tuesday at 9am. Shocking.

But it seems there might be some cost to the child according to this article. Hopefully they can back up the initial study with the necessary research and doctors can go back to thinking more about their patients care rather than the golf course.

Babies coming into the world by cesarean section experience epigenetic changes, a study has found. So far there has not been enough follow up to know whether the effects are long lasting, but the discovery may explain the relatively poorer outcomes for babies delivered in this way.

Cesarean delivery, where the mother's abdomen and uterus are surgically cut open to remove the baby, was once a last, desperate option. However, rates are increasing dramatically worldwide, closing on 50% in China.

The trend is deeply controversial among health professionals, with a variety of concerns expressed about the consequences, including hemorrhaging, persistent pain and depression for the mother and respiratory diseases and obesity for the baby. However, in many countries perverse financial incentives favor the use of cesareans even where a vaginal birth is probably the better choice.

Despite epidemiological evidence that cesarean birth is associated with a higher risk of conditions such as type-1 diabetes the mechanism is unknown, which may have hampered responses. However, Professor Tomas Ekstrom has provided a step towards an explanation with a paper in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

"In this study, our focus has been whether the way a baby is born can have an impact on a cellular level in the form of epigenetic alterations in DNA,” Ekstrom said.

Ekstrom found higher rates of methylation in stem cells from 18 babies delivered by by cesarean than 25 via vaginal birth. Methylation of DNA affects whether genes are expressed or not within a cell and is the major path through which environmental factors can alter the expression of genetic traits.

When Ekstrom did a more detailed study of twelve of the babies he found statistically significant differences in methylation in almost 350 regions, many of which are known to influence the immune system.

"During a vaginal delivery, the fetus is exposed to an increased level of stress, which in a positive way will prepare the unborn baby for life outside the uterus," said co-author Professor Mikael Norman. "This activation of the fetus' defense systems doesn't occur when a cesarean section is performed before labor begins, which in turn could be a possible cause for the noticed differences between the groups.”

“"The biological mechanisms predisposing a fetus or a newborn infant to get a certain disease later in life are complex and depend on both genetic and environmental factors during formative years", Ekstrom noted. He pointed out that epigenetic changes can be either temporary or permanent and it is too early to tell whether the effects he identified will last. However, it is particularly concerning that some epigenetic effects are not only permanent, but get passed on to offspring, potentially making the effects of a single birth multigenerational.


Read more at http://www.iflscience.com/health-an...enetic-changes-babies-dna#RaiXMyV4o0CmKQu2.99

http://www.iflscience.com/health-an...ivery-may-cause-epigenetic-changes-babies-dna
 

undesign

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2007
Messages
9,024
Riveting stuff. So is some of the other content on that source page...



Screen Shot 2014-07-07 at 7.36.44 PM.jpg

Screen Shot 2014-07-07 at 7.37.12 PM.jpg
 

Spizz

Goat Botherer
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
31,568
Riveting stuff. So is some of the other content on that source page...

It's the website of a popular Facebook page.

But fsck me, no wonder doctors are laughing at the gullibility of South Africans.

As you were....
 

Lycanthrope

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
13,320
6sezFGt.gif


Colour me sceptical.
 

RyanPCMR

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
4,291
There are lots of arguments against C-sections done and in SA we are actually monitoring how frequently it is used instead of a normal vaginal delivery.

The cost of C-sections makes it something that the private healthcare sector will offer mostly over a public or government institution. Very complicated deliveries would be referred for C-section but doctors (aka little "gods") are abusing people's ignorance in this regard. LOL!
 

Nerfherder

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
29,738
IFL is a brilliant blog.

Perhaps read a bit more before you dismiss it.


SA has insanely high caesarian rates, its something like 70% and only about 10% are necessary.

There is a massive cost implication for both private and public health systems.
 

Spizz

Goat Botherer
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
31,568
There are lots of arguments against C-sections done and in SA we are actually monitoring how frequently it is used instead of a normal vaginal delivery.

The cost of C-sections makes it something that the private healthcare sector will offer mostly over a public or government institution. Very complicated deliveries would be referred for C-section but doctors (aka little "gods") are abusing people's ignorance in this regard. LOL!

Big time. The situation in SA is pretty shocking and most people just take it for granted when told they 'have' to have a c-section and that the doctor knows best. And whereas before the problem was the health of the mother, although I've heard similar detrimental things about kids missing out on the trauma of birth, it looks like perhaps there is more damage done than previously realised.

Sure it's early days and granted it needs a lot more research, but it doesn't surprise me one bit and if it helps stop the malpractice of the doctors, then it can't come soon enough.
 

w1z4rd

Karmic Sangoma
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
49,748
IFL is a brilliant blog.

Perhaps read a bit more before you dismiss it.


SA has insanely high caesarian rates, its something like 70% and only about 10% are necessary.

There is a massive cost implication for both private and public health systems.

I follow IFL and they do make mistakes. Like their meat eating squirrels...

This comment some it up best:


Weak evidence. Also, epigenetic changes are NOT changes to DNA. That's why it's epigenetic, and not "genetic". IFLS has been pretty shoddy lately. Especially the story with the squirrel, where your facebook post flatly said it kills deer and eats their internal organs. Which was, of course, bull**** clikbait, and when you click the story, "according to folklore" is attached to that ridiculous claim.

Try harder. You could actually be delivering interesting science to people. You haven't been doing this lately, though.
 
Top