Sorry for the necropost. Only saw your comment now and I'm a little sick of the baseless accusations regarding our ethics and integrity we've been enduring lately, so I find myself unable to hold my tongue.
Why state in the headline that this product is being held up by icasa, but then no other mention in the article?
(a) You seem to have misread the subtitle/excerpt.
(b) ...
<cough>
General manager of markets and competition at the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa [that's ICASA, by the way], Pieter Grootes, recently highlighted Maboneng as an example of “what we all want” to the rest of the telecommunications industry.
</cough>
Advertorials should be marked as such.
I'm sure if we ever post advertorial they will be. Maybe I'll eat my words one day, but I don't foresee a day where we would need to run advertorial without clearly marking them as such.
Please refrain from harmful insinuations about my integrity, or our ethics (this piece is marked Staff Writer, but I'm the one who put it together with the information on hand; I asked Maboneng for comment as well but they didn't respond by the time of publication).
If you think you could have done an article better by all means voice your discontent, but I see no reason to take potshots at a journalist's character, or a publication's integrity, simply because you have a negative opinion about an article.