Benedict A55h0le
Executive Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2020
- Messages
- 6,199
That happens, but it will happen less in the future, and is not the EV`s fault.
That happens, but it will happen less in the future, and is not the EV`s fault.
Saffers are not the smartest bunch, we are talking about NZ.
They would have done the calculations, and it is meant to deter farmers from producing meat by making another more sustainable way of food production more viable. I do not know the entire strategy, but there will be 1.So a farting tax will make people eat less meat?
Yes, we all need to fart less.You think we as mere humans can make an impact on climate?
They would have done the calculations, and it is meant to deter farmers from producing meat by making another more sustainable way of food production more viable. I do not know the entire strategy, but there will be 1.
And yes I think it will make people eat less meat. Sugar is cheap compared to meat and the price of meat have definitely made me eat less of it.
And yes I think it will make people eat less meat. Sugar is cheap compared to meat and the price of meat have definitely made me eat less of it.
Splitting hairs here. I will say again, I do know know the entire strategy but I would be surprised if there is none.How are they going to tax all the other animals the farmer doesn't own but live on his farm like hedgehogs, squirrels and mice? Or are they exempt because they can't be enumerated or attributed to the farmer to collect tax from?
So you’re clueless, but 100% sure it’s going to work for something?They would have done the calculations, and it is meant to deter farmers from producing meat by making another more sustainable way of food production more viable. I do not know the entire strategy, but there will be 1.
It is obviously not just farting, the impact of unsustainable farming has been proven in science. Yes, the large amount of humans is the issue, and the more sustainable food is produced the larger the population earth can carry.There are over 7 billion humans. There were 3 billion 40 years ago. And you want to blame livestock for all the farting? Decrease the humans and livestock has to decrease too as the demand isn't that great...
After the great plague in Europe, there was an abundance of food and they were close to famine before the plague. Human population is the biggest threat to the planet.
No you are clueless.So you’re clueless, but 100% sure it’s going to work for something?
Splitting hairs here. I will say again, I do know know the entire strategy but I would be surprised if there is none.
the more sustainable food is produced the larger the population earth can carry.
Its all on a sliding scale and its all bad, farming cows just a bit more bad, humans are doomed. Having said that, humans can be clever so if you can invent more sustainable food production while you cut back on the worst, maybe there is a small chance of your survival.This means you need more fertilisers to cause algal blooms in water runoff poisoning streams, rivers and the ocean as well as more fossil fuels for tractors and farming implements. Unless you're going to renewable the entire planet. India says hello.
It`s the new age, you clearly are not an Aquarius.The mentally ill is truly running the world now...