Climate scientists plan campaign against global warming skeptics

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
"The budget is spiraling out of control while government is handing out billions of dollars in grants to climate scientists, many of whom are unabashed activists."

Eish don't like the idea of funds being cut off of a once financially so rewarding enterprise :erm:
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
What exactly are you talking about?

well it's hard to expect the average joe to give up his tax dollars to deal with man made global warming when he sees believers not seriously cutting back themselves.
 

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229
I'm still not following you here. Failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will have a far greater impact on the lives and pockets of Average Joes than an effective mitigation strategy will. Almost all the science agrees. That's what the OP is about - science advocacy has taken a step into the public spotlight to counter Republican corporate shills that have taken power in the US.
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
Everything is being cut back why should Climate scientists/activists be any different especially when the faithful are such conspicuous spenders themselves.

I'm sure they could cover the cut backs if Hollywood celeb evangelicals like Leonardo Di caprio start selling up their multi million dollar mansions and toys, maybe replace your scoobie for a ****ty golf and donate the proceeds :p etc.

Like I said the average joe won't give up his money if he sees the actual believers doing little or nothing beyond symbolic efforts themselves.
 
Last edited:

D34M0n7

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
6,680
Hmm... this whole global warming thing is very shaky.

Honestly theres not much evidence pointing towards climate change due to pollution vs climate change due to the 'wobble' of the planet.

We can see the weather change in an area thats heavily polluted, slightly, but thats a small scale effect.

I'm not saying theres no such thing as global climate change due to pollutants, I'm just saying we need a little more thought and a little less bias.
 

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229
Everything is being cut back why should Climate scientists/activists be any different especially when the faithful are such conspicuous spenders themselves.

I'm sure they could cover the cut backs if Hollywood celeb evangelicals like Leonardo Di caprio start selling up their multi million dollar mansions and toys, maybe replace your scoobie for a ****ty golf and donate the proceeds :p etc.

Like I said the average joe won't give up his money if he sees the actual believers doing little or nothing beyond symbolic efforts themselves.

No, Republicans will INCREASE spending on oil and gas exploration and drilling and decrease spending on renewables.
 

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229
Hmm... this whole global warming thing is very shaky.

Honestly theres not much evidence pointing towards climate change due to pollution vs climate change due to the 'wobble' of the planet.

We can see the weather change in an area thats heavily polluted, slightly, but thats a small scale effect.

I'm not saying theres no such thing as global climate change due to pollutants, I'm just saying we need a little more thought and a little less bias.

The bit I bolded... that's pure bull****. I suggest you do some reading up on the science.
 

D34M0n7

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
6,680
The bit I bolded... that's pure bull****. I suggest you do some reading up on the science.

I have, in fact I have done a lot!

The thing is the earth naturally changes its position, the location of the equator shifts up and down, etc. I'm not going to go all in here on the detail.

The effect on the global climate due to this shifting and various other effects can produce what we are seeing today.

So to totally ignore that fact and point at pollution and say ITS THAT ITS THAT, is an very naive thing to do.

Simple thing is we have not been around long enough to say for sure, so its not the correct time to be choosing sides.
 

eclipsedx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
177
I am sorry to say but its this kind of thinking that is delaying the Worlds time to react. People saying that there is no clear indication that CO2 causes global warming. Yes CO2 levels has been at this levels a few million years ago not just once or twice. But CO2 levels has been a indication of great climate changes on is the way.

Well I personaly believe its to late. There is no way for us to change our mindsets anymore. In another 10 years time we would have long surpassed the point of return. The Earth it self will clean it self off of this Virus called the Human race in less than 10 000 years the buildings that you see that shapes our skylines will be all that remains of us all.

We cant change 6 billion peoples way of thinking when it would cost the most wealthy the most money. They will keep on promoting this way of life. Its pointless we are already doomed.
 

eclipsedx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
177
I have, in fact I have done a lot!

The thing is the earth naturally changes its position, the location of the equator shifts up and down, etc. I'm not going to go all in here on the detail.

The effect on the global climate due to this shifting and various other effects can produce what we are seeing today.

So to totally ignore that fact and point at pollution and say ITS THAT ITS THAT, is an very naive thing to do.

Simple thing is we have not been around long enough to say for sure, so its not the correct time to be choosing sides.


Stop stuffing that crack pipe its bad for you. The wobble of the eath has nothing to do with the CO2 levels in the atmosphere please dont smoke crack then come post stupid statments here.
 

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229
I have, in fact I have done a lot!

The thing is the earth naturally changes its position, the location of the equator shifts up and down, etc. I'm not going to go all in here on the detail.

The effect on the global climate due to this shifting and various other effects can produce what we are seeing today.

So to totally ignore that fact and point at pollution and say ITS THAT ITS THAT, is an very naive thing to do.

Simple thing is we have not been around long enough to say for sure, so its not the correct time to be choosing sides.

Funny because pretty much all the peer reviewed literature disagrees with what you just said.
 

D34M0n7

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
6,680
Stop stuffing that crack pipe its bad for you. The wobble of the eath has nothing to do with the CO2 levels in the atmosphere please dont smoke crack then come post stupid statments here.

I guess you study geography then?

Of course the wobble affects the global climate!

If you can't understand that then you don't have sufficient knowledge to be on this thread! What an ignorant thing to say!

The earths axes is not constant, it changes... Changing the angle at which radiation enters the atmosphere at different latitudes.

This change DIRECTLY causes climate change...

Add to that the ocean currents and the solar energy received at the poles, theres just too much to type!

And if you think CO2 is the only gas then lol! what about Methane, Nitroseoxide, Ozone and Water Vapor!? Did they just stop existing?

I'm not saying that gas levels don't affect climate at all, I'm just saying they are not the only players here so we HAVE to take that into account before we start pooling money and fighting political wars.

We have not been observing the climate for thousands of years, we can't just point and shoot here.
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
No, Republicans will INCREASE spending on oil and gas exploration and drilling and decrease spending on renewables.

Well if that's the most economically viable option. If it's not they'll get voted out again
 
Last edited:

Techne

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
12,851
Lol
Inaccurate news reports misrepresent a climate-science initiative of the American Geophysical Union

AGU Release No. 10–37
8 November 2010
For Immediate Release

WASHINGTON—An article appearing in the Los Angeles Times, and then picked up by media outlets far and wide, misrepresents the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and a climate science project the AGU is about to relaunch. The project, called Climate Q&A Service, aims simply to provide accurate scientific answers to questions from journalists about climate science.

“In contrast to what has been reported in the LA Times and elsewhere, there is no campaign by AGU against climate skeptics or congressional conservatives,” says Christine McEntee, Executive Director and CEO of the American Geophysical Union. “AGU will continue to provide accurate scientific information on Earth and space topics to inform the general public and to support sound public policy development.”

AGU is the world's largest, not-for-profit, professional society of Earth and space scientists, with more than 58,000 members in over 135 countries.

“AGU is a scientific society, not an advocacy organization,” says climate scientist and AGU President Michael J. McPhaden. “The organization is committed to promoting scientific discovery and to disseminating to the scientific community, policy makers, the media, and the public, peer-reviewed scientific findings across a broad range of Earth and space sciences.”

AGU initiated a climate science Q&A service for the first time in 2009 to provide accurate scientific information for journalists covering the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. AGU has been working over the past year on how to provide this service once again in association with the upcoming UN Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico.

AGU's Climate Q&A service addresses scientific questions only. It does not involve any commentary on policy. Journalists are able to submit questions via email, and AGU member-volunteers with Ph.D.s in climate science-related fields provide answers via email.

The relaunch of the Climate Q&A service is pending. When AGU is ready to announce the service, we will notify journalists on our distribution list via a media advisory that the service is once again available for their use.

For additional information about the Q&A service please see a 2 March 2010 article [pdf] about the 2009 Q&A service that was published in AGU's weekly newspaper Eos, and a blog post about the service on AGU's science communication blog The Plainspoken Scientist.

The American Geophysical Union was established in 1919, and is headquartered in Washington, D.C. AGU advances the Earth and space sciences through its scholarly publications, meetings and conferences, and outreach programs. For more information, please visit the AGU web site.
 

SmartKit

SmartKit Rep
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
8,218
I am sorry to say but its this kind of thinking that is delaying the Worlds time to react. People saying that there is no clear indication that CO2 causes global warming. Yes CO2 levels has been at this levels a few million years ago not just once or twice. But CO2 levels has been a indication of great climate changes on is the way.

Well I personaly believe its to late. There is no way for us to change our mindsets anymore. In another 10 years time we would have long surpassed the point of return. The Earth it self will clean it self off of this Virus called the Human race in less than 10 000 years the buildings that you see that shapes our skylines will be all that remains of us all.

We cant change 6 billion peoples way of thinking when it would cost the most wealthy the most money. They will keep on promoting this way of life. Its pointless we are already doomed.

Yes it has, and more than likely as a result, rather than a cause, of a changing climate. It's too late because there was never anything we could do about it, we don't have the ability to change the climate globally, nor have we ever had that ability. The planet is doing what it does and we just have to strap ourselves in and enjoy the ride.
 
Top