People who pay anything less than R175 (+ transport) should be ashamed of themselves tbh.A minimum wage increase is better than more paperwork imo.
Assuming an 8 hour work day, minimum wage about R175 per day. That is definitely not unreasonably high.
And thats is why we dont have a domestic, even if you need a person a few times, the laws makes it too much of a hassle. Too many stories, rather not go down that rabbit hole. Where do need , we get a cleaning service, but we have not used a cleaning service since about 2 years ago.People who pay anything less than R175 (+ transport) should be ashamed of themselves tbh.
All these acts are actually hurting them more. But hey, who am I to say this?
You are the only person to really ask the correct question! Why can't we have tax breaks as domestic employers? We are paying them with after tax funds as it stands whilst still adhering to UIF/Contracts etc etc...This is actually the point. As an employer of a domestic you are not allowed to deduct their wage from my income tax, just like every other employer is allowed to do. Why not?
Sure it would go a long way to balance things out.
Not a tax person but I think it is because of the rule it is only tax deductible, if it is in the production of income. I.e. a cleaning service can deduct but not a normal person. But where the grey area is, quite a few business employs directly or use a cleaning service which they deduct for tax, but one could argue it is not in the production of income.You are the only person to really ask the correct question! Why can't we have tax breaks as domestic employers? We are paying them with after tax funds as it stands whilst still adhering to UIF/Contracts etc etc...
That would make a heck of a lot of sense. The problem comes in when you red-tape doors shut due to overly complicated laws which help turn people to move away from employing someone. Sure, laws are needed to protect domestic employees but the benefit vs cost ratio for average Joe out there is running pretty steep. Bring the correct tax benefits in and watch how domestic employment skyrockets!Not a tax person but I think it is because of the rule it is only tax deductible, if it is in the production of income. I.e. a cleaning service can deduct but not a normal person. But where the grey area is, quite a few business employs directly or use a cleaning service which they deduct for tax, but one could argue it is not in the production of income.
Ripe for ewc picking.My sister in law came form Kimberley, moved into a house in Vredenburg. The previous owners had a maid, live in, own room with kitchen and bathroom, seperate entrance. When my sister was finalising the last part of her move down the previous owner rather casually informed her that the maid will be staying on.
Everything came to a screeching halt. SIster said she bought a house, not a main, and with all the rules and regulations lately she has no interest in a maid, especially given the state of the house when she flew down for a check.
Maid had to go, and the previous owner had to sort it out. bit of a whaffle but it was done.
What about everyone now working from home? If you have someone who is cleaning your study/office, wouldn't that now fall under a working environment?You are the only person to really ask the correct question! Why can't we have tax breaks as domestic employers? We are paying them with after tax funds as it stands whilst still adhering to UIF/Contracts etc etc...
Won't Mrs. Palm and her five daughters become jealous?Happy with Mrs Bosch thanks.
One can argue that customers expect to walk into a clean place and if it's dirty they'll lose business.Not a tax person but I think it is because of the rule it is only tax deductible, if it is in the production of income. I.e. a cleaning service can deduct but not a normal person. But where the grey area is, quite a few business employs directly or use a cleaning service which they deduct for tax, but one could argue it is not in the production of income.