Yes but not while In motion, which was my point. But anyway you never actually argue against my points only strawma 's and insults
Why would motion be a problem?
These are LEO satellites. There’s some tricky routing and balancing happening with them considering they zip around the earth in 90 minutes. You moving means nothing.
That rabbit hole goes deep- trouble is, once you go down it, it's Hotel CaliforniaWe want free money! Paid for by our citizens. Then they can get Starlink.\
Was talking to someone in the industry who said they're very sure the big guys at MTN, Vodacom, and other large ISPs are paying a lot of "favors" to Govt officials to make sure Starlink doesn't see the light of day here. The impact to them will be high...
Yip, only cares about fast internet no matter where you are.Lady must go duty calls
And remember Elon doesn't care about you
You have just totally destroyed my day.Lady must go duty calls
And remember Elon doesn't care about you
but LTE sucks. We are already I’m the 5G era.Ah you miss the point, the main point, point is self ownership.
If North Korea can do it so can we
1. Lte - controlled by one party ????? I can build my own lte infrastructure( communities can do that)
2. They don't need to know how it works ??? Well I argue its better for us if we had the know how also.no Brainer
3. Oversees players yes , but when it comes down to it we can take possession of the local equipment ( you missed my point here)
4.Lol, what ? Hihi
Hihi, first I need you to give me 5 remote areas that meets this criteria you put fourth
Do these communities have access to electricity and
water?
Many such small towns in ZA. No internet. Bugger-all.Yes, the small towns of 1000 to 5000 people do but many remote farms and schools have been off grid for decades in the Namakwa District Municipality. And it's 100 km between towns with no LTE. Cell drops off 10 km out of any town. Tracker doesn't work.
Seriously, who gives a crap about ownership. Get everyone internet access, as quickly as we can. Starlink would be a game changer for rural communities and remote locations.Ah you miss the point, the main point, point is self ownership.
If North Korea can do it so can we
1. Lte - controlled by one party ????? I can build my own lte infrastructure( communities can do that)
2. They don't need to know how it works ??? Well I argue its better for us if we had the know how also.no Brainer
3. Oversees players yes , but when it comes down to it we can take possession of the local equipment ( you missed my point here)
4.Lol, what ? Hihi
This is who she is apparently:Seriously, who gives a crap about ownership. Get everyone internet access, as quickly as we can. Starlink would be a game changer for rural communities and remote locations.
Ladywhoeverthefnckyouare: you're a troll. Mindless. Definitely NOT an economist. Are you TheChamp in pink?
Great, the pseudo-science that is critical humanities.I only concern myself with welfare economics. Rest of economics is about profit maximization through price, output etc it is depressing
It doesn't care about humans,only firms.
It does. Any wireless technology works while in motion but at reduced efficiency. Starlink also needs to be kept aligned.Yes but not while In motion, which was my point. But anyway you never actually argue against my points only strawma 's and insults
North Korea how? You know even how you poop gets controlled there?Ah you miss the point, the main point, point is self ownership.
If North Korea can do it so can we
1. Lte - controlled by one party ????? I can build my own lte infrastructure( communities can do that)
2. They don't need to know how it works ??? Well I argue its better for us if we had the know how also.no Brainer
3. Oversees players yes , but when it comes down to it we can take possession of the local equipment ( you missed my point here)
4.Lol, what ? Hihi
This, so much this lolwhen North Korea enters the conversation
Oh lawd....
Can only imagine how licensed operators would react if Elon received special waivers for licensing requirements.
Why? Does that somehow reverse those who have complied?scrapped those "requirements", is that easier?
Why? Does that somehow reverse those who have complied?
So Dreamking Inc has a ECS and ECNS license and wanted to comply with regulations. Dreamking Inc disposes of 30% equity to comply. ICASA now scrap these regulations to make Elon Musk happy. Is Dreamking Inc happy?ease legal requirement / restriction is not your type, right?
make other people's lives difficult that is what you love, correct?