Electric cars are worse for the environment than diesel in South Africa
Electric vehicles are said to be environmentally friendly alternatives to petrol and diesel-powered cars, but this is not the case in South Africa.
South Africa relies heavily on coal-fired power plants, which release substantial amounts of pollutants and carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere.
Maybe include a source for the SA "carbon emission factor". Not disputing or anything, just lets the reader look at more detail, because details matter here. Would be interesting to know if this SA wide factor includes any sort of distribution losses or mining etc. I'm certain the BMW factor does not include local operating conditions. Also over time (you use 10 years), that 118d will consume more oil.
The 23% is quite close when you're comparing CO2e vs CO2. Or does the 118d technical data specify CO2e? Unfortunately there are also methane and N2O emissions from vehicles. This cannot be discounted.
But the crux of the issue for me is co-benefits from air quality.
The EU chased CO2 and looked at diesel as the holy grail (purely due to lower fuel consumption).
They didn't consider very high NOx and PM emissions from diesel. Now they sit with a black carbon, NOx and ammonia issue. Slowly phasing out diesel, but had to resort to things like higher taxes and traffic zoning.
Actually "they" did know this, but the people looking at CO2 were more funded and higher ranking.
Also you have to consider vehicle emissions (in your face) vs power-plant emissions (from a 200m stack).
Our power plants are probably some of the worst in the world, but shifting to diesel is not the solution.