AfricanTech
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2010
- Messages
- 40,365
Basically VPNs encapsulate everything inside UDP as well as multiplying the sessions. Their servers also probably change the TCP congestion algorithm.Blow me down with a feather
I have never seen speeds like this on Speedtest to New York
With VPN on
View attachment 746509
With VPN off
View attachment 746511
The irony
Sounds like a normal number then, what are you expecting to see?@PBCool @TheRoDent local and international connection seems better. Pings to London are still 170+ from CPT though
Sounds like a normal number then, what are you expecting to see?
Ping: 1ms
Download: 597.48Mbps
Upload: 103.93Mbps
My result.
170 is close... and as expected imhoNormal? Connection to London is usually low 140s from CPT
Do you have the right hardware to handle 1Gbps?
How much would it cost?
170 is close... and as expected imho
If you are pointing to gaming latency? Anything less than ~180 is okAn extra 30ms is not close enough. This isn’t JHB lol
The gigabit router supplied to me by yourselves. But its not a train smash, at this stage you have bigger issues to worry about than my minor query. When you all sorted out that side and you have caught up on some sleep we can look into it.
If you are pointing to gaming latency? Anything less than ~180 is ok
The latency should be around 140 in cpt, 170 in jhb and 190 in dbn. If the latency is 170 in cpt, then it will be 190 in jhb and 210 in dbn. So there might be some adjustments needed to optimize the routing, or CISP could be running on backup paths. We will have to see what @PBCool and @TheRoDent says.170 is close... and as expected imho
I see, ok wasnt aware of additional latency, but makes senseThe latency should be around 140 in cpt, 170 in jhb and 190 in dbn. If the latency is 170 in cpt, then it will be 190 in jhb and 210 in dbn. So there might be some adjustments needed to optimize the routing, or CISP could be running on backup paths. We will have to see what @PBCool and @TheRoDent says.