Same here. Brackenfell
And she is upAnother one, vumatel, stellenberg, dead
If it was then it would have been happening since we did the change so unlikely, did your service go down this morning?Also having issues now, internet is off/on/off/on ... Brackenfell, CPT, Vumatel Trenched, 1000/100
Could this maintenance of this morning be a factor/cause?
Have seen the conversation with Divian and Vumatel around this. It is being followed up regularly.Still been having daily intermittent "drops" on my Vuma line, Panorama CPT. Not sure if this is related to the rest of the peeps whose lines just dropped.
Fired up a trace while it was happening:
View attachment 810991
Coolio!Have seen the conversation with Divian and Vumatel around this. It is being followed up regularly.
I only started using the internet at around 10ish, so not sure....If it was then it would have been happening since we did the change so unlikely, did your service go down this morning?
Automated tests
View attachment 810951
Nope, it is just simple .NET Core app I wrote before Speedtest released their CLI app.Curios.. are those tests running on a 'tik ? If so what might they be called?
But would that not imply it would be more of gradual thing? Or maybe they turn on (or increase) the buffers based on some conditions?Good explanation here.
![]()
Switch Buffer Sizing
What is the relationship between a switches buffer size and the effect it has on latency? I am aware of the bufferbloat issue and understand that buffers that are too large in networks of slower BW...networkengineering.stackexchange.com
Octotel switched to a lot of Arista kit for backhaul about a year ago.
So the switch isn't dropping your packets, but rather buffering them until it can transmit it without loss.
This obviously happens during congestion.
Well, the switch would decide when it's uplink is congested, and then start deep buffering.But would that not imply it would be more of gradual thing? Or maybe they turn on (or increase) the buffers based on some conditions?