Cool Ideas Fibre ISP – Feedback Thread 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

zx14

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
270
Unfortunately, I have no contract or contact with TTConnect, so have to raise this here.
 

PBCool

Cool Ideas Rep
Company Rep
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
13,304
That just proves my point that this is a cool ideas issue and not a vuma issue in my area as I am constantly told by cool ideas support.
If you are on ex SADV IE Vumatel Villages it is an ongoing issue with Vumatel, I will have our SDM send you the report we have from Vumatel.
 

PBCool

Cool Ideas Rep
Company Rep
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
13,304
Can't connect to my work VPN via CISP DNS server but 1.1.1.1 connected first time...
We use root servers so usually an issue with the entry, but with the likes of quad 9 or Google DNS they often cache stuff for longer. Happy to have a look if you like?
 

CrypticZA

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
3,046
We use root servers so usually an issue with the entry, but with the likes of quad 9 or Google DNS they often cache stuff for longer. Happy to have a look if you like?
We run an app based in the UK and a lot of users have been reporting issues with it this morning (multiple ISPs both mobile and fibre - both CT & JHB) and the error popping up in the app is a unable to resolve host name and now work VPN (Liquid telecom local) is the same so somewhere there seems to be a DNS service not doing so well.

Seems to be intermitted though, changed to Cloudflare on router so things are running fine for now can send you the host names via DM if you want to dig into it but i found a workaround
 

Frequency

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
18
If you are on ex SADV IE Vumatel Villages it is an ongoing issue with Vumatel, I will have our SDM send you the report we have from Vumatel.
Thanks PBCool but how long will this be an ongoing issue? I have been hearing its a vuma villages issue for the past 7 months and nobody is doing anything to resolve it. I have no point of contact with vuma and cool ideas refuses to provide me with any contact information stating that the escalation should go through them but nothing happens regardless of the escalations. I am paying for a service that I am not receiving and nobody is willing to take accountability for it. This is really not fair.
 

PBCool

Cool Ideas Rep
Company Rep
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
13,304
Thanks PBCool but how long will this be an ongoing issue? I have been hearing its a vuma villages issue for the past 7 months and nobody is doing anything to resolve it. I have no point of contact with vuma and cool ideas refuses to provide me with any contact information stating that the escalation should go through them but nothing happens regardless of the escalations. I am paying for a service that I am not receiving and nobody is willing to take accountability for it. This is really not fair.
It hasn't been an active issue for 7 months, at least we or Vumatel are only aware of it for the last 2 months or so. It is related to disruptions on their backhaul providers network who is DFA. As mentioned certain ETAs are around 6 weeks for permanent resolution.

I have escalated this to executive level which I have mentioned previously, pop me your account details and our SDM will send you the feedback from Vumatel on your area/estate.
 

Joseph_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
Messages
300
@TheRoDent trying to run an iperf test to the JHB servers and it gives me these errors each time.
1670330589169.png
Cape Town and London works fine, just having trouble with both JHB
 

chrisGolf

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
309
Quad 9 should return via a local latency path now.
Thanks

Code:
$ ping 9.9.9.9 -c 5
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=4.07 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=4.20 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=4.27 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=4.09 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=4.06 ms

--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.061/4.138/4.274/0.083 ms

was quad9 an isolated issue? or would other routes be impacted ?
 
Last edited:

zx14

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
270
"I am getting very similar speeds on a 50/25 line with Vodacom. What speed is normal for a single connection test overseas?"

This was on 50/50

46/34
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top