CrypticZA
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
- Messages
- 3,046
You Warp standard or premium? I got premium if you standard pop me IPs I'll checkOff topic - any WARP users notice how garbage EU latencies have become on the service recently?
You Warp standard or premium? I got premium if you standard pop me IPs I'll checkOff topic - any WARP users notice how garbage EU latencies have become on the service recently?
You Warp standard or premium? I got premium if you standard pop me IPs I'll check
You Warp standard or premium? I got premium if you standard pop me IPs I'll check
So i use the old wireguard method and it still gives me warp+ for free haha where a friend uses their app and at times we have seen routes be slightly different where my route had slightly better latency but it has been a rare sight. I almost always would go via WACS where sometimes she would go via a slightly longer route and hit London with 160msWhat differences are you seeing vs non-warp? Curious as I was recently looking into the premium option. But couldn't see anything/findings for us local peeps.
What is the IP i'll just check on my side for interest sake?Nah this is premium. Though to be honest I've traced quite a few routes with a free account and premium and there is zero difference.
Lately I haven't seen latency even to London below about 170-180ms.
What is the IP i'll just check on my side for interest sake?
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.3.2 - 0 | 298 | 298 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 154.0.0.113 - 0 | 298 | 298 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 154.0.4.194 - 0 | 298 | 298 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Request timed out. - 100 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 154.0.4.194 - 81 | 71 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Request timed out. - 100 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 196.223.14.173 - 38 | 119 | 74 | 2 | 5 | 23 | 3 |
| ae21-0.icr01.jnb20.ntwk.msn.net - 77 | 73 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 21 | 7 |
| be-100-0.ibr01.jnb20.ntwk.msn.net - 70 | 79 | 24 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 3 |
| 196.223.14.173 - 87 | 67 | 9 | 0 | 18 | 23 | 23 |
| ae100-0.icr01.cpt20.ntwk.msn.net - 51 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 20 | 60 | 3 |
| ae27-0.cpt02-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net - 28 | 141 | 102 | 4 | 23 | 48 | 22 |
| 13.104.186.208 - 20 | 167 | 134 | 2 | 21 | 36 | 3 |
| ae27-0.cpt02-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net - 66 | 83 | 29 | 0 | 22 | 24 | 23 |
| 154.0.4.194 - 71 | 78 | 23 | 0 | 15 | 32 | 3 |
| 13.104.186.208 - 96 | 62 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 27 | 27 |
| 52.113.194.132 - 36 | 123 | 79 | 0 | 20 | 33 | 3 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v1.00 GPLv2 (original by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider)
What differences are you seeing vs non-warp? Curious as I was recently looking into the premium option. But couldn't see anything/findings for us local peeps.
Nah this is premium. Though to be honest I've traced quite a few routes with a free account and premium and there is zero difference.
Lately I haven't seen latency even to London below about 170-180ms.
So i use the old wireguard method and it still gives me warp+ for free haha where a friend uses their app and at times we have seen routes be slightly different where my route had slightly better latency but it has been a rare sight. I almost always would go via WACS where sometimes she would go via a slightly longer route and hit London with 160ms
What is the IP i'll just check on my side for interest sake?
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 172.16.0.1 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 172.68.185.1 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 197.157.64.174 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| No response from host - 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| cr1-amx-et42.wolcomm.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 |
| 212.119.4.176 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 |
| ae-12.r21.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 145 | 145 | 146 | 146 |
| ae-16.r20.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 154 | 154 | 155 | 154 |
| ae-0.r21.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 |
| ae-8.r00.lxmblc01.lu.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 158 | 158 | 159 | 158 |
|ae-9-2644.r00.lxmblc01.lu.ce.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 162 | 164 | 166 | 162 |
| 188.42.168.223 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 162 | 164 | 166 | 162 |
| 188.42.42.118 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 161 | 161 | 162 | 162 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider
We don't have access to IPV6Well there is 1 big difference. Torrents. On Warp+ it's max speed where with free it's slow.
Yeah this works but there is also the difference between ipv4 and ipv6 routes.
We don't have access to IPV6![]()
Yeah, something weird's going on. Just played a game - my in-game ping was above 200ms. The trace resolves to this, with an expected ping. Not sure what to make of it:
Code:|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 172.16.0.1 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 172.68.185.1 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 197.157.64.174 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | No response from host - 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | cr1-amx-et42.wolcomm.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 | | 212.119.4.176 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 | | ae-12.r21.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 145 | 145 | 146 | 146 | | ae-16.r20.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 154 | 154 | 155 | 154 | | ae-0.r21.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 | | ae-8.r00.lxmblc01.lu.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 158 | 158 | 159 | 158 | |ae-9-2644.r00.lxmblc01.lu.ce.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 162 | 164 | 166 | 162 | | 188.42.168.223 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 162 | 164 | 166 | 162 | | 188.42.42.118 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 161 | 161 | 162 | 162 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider
That IP address is in LuxemburgI don't get the same behaviour through my London VPS. 140-150ms pings. Unless CF is prioritising by traffic type now.
Well there is 1 big difference. Torrents. On Warp+ it's max speed where with free it's slow.
Yeah this works but there is also the difference between ipv4 and ipv6 routes.
That IP address is in Luxemburg
Connection is going London -> Paris -> Luxemburg
LON - PAR - LUX
A lookup of the IP confirms the location
View attachment 1437563
CISP gives me 158 and warp gives me 162ms which is accurate for that region i know since Dota 2 EU servers are in the location
EDIT* Warp just takes you via Amsterdam as well so thats where the extra latency comes from so not sure?
OK so Openserve finally released the line, CI took over. Now I have to wait 24-48 hours for the router. They said I can use another router in the meantime and gave me the ppoe stuff.
Since the ONT works as a router too, can I use that? And if so, how? Because I can't seem to access the thing. I've tried wireless, wired, made sure of no proxy. Made sure of ip 192.168.100.1, made static ip and used the above as gateway, even hard reset it etc, still can't connect to the thing...?
No, you cant use the ONT as a router because it doesnt dial the pppoe connection. It purely acts as a fibre to copper conversion. You need a router to dial the pppoe, or you can use you laptop and have it dial the connection when plugged directly into the ONTOK so Openserve finally released the line, CI took over. Now I have to wait 24-48 hours for the router. They said I can use another router in the meantime and gave me the ppoe stuff.
Since the ONT works as a router too, can I use that? And if so, how? Because I can't seem to access the thing. I've tried wireless, wired, made sure of no proxy. Made sure of ip 192.168.100.1, made static ip and used the above as gateway, even hard reset it etc, still can't connect to the thing...?