Cool Ideas Fibre ISP – Feedback Thread 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

Soprono

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Messages
1,625
You Warp standard or premium? I got premium if you standard pop me IPs I'll check

What differences are you seeing vs non-warp? Curious as I was recently looking into the premium option. But couldn't see anything/findings for us local peeps.
 

chrisGolf

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
309
Any news on the outages? I don’t see updates on other ISPs? Assuming it’s a CISP related outage? Just a Vodacom outage Gauteng, on afrihost status page.
 

Seeyou

Expert Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,705
You Warp standard or premium? I got premium if you standard pop me IPs I'll check

Nah this is premium. Though to be honest I've traced quite a few routes with a free account and premium and there is zero difference.

Lately I haven't seen latency even to London below about 170-180ms.
 

CrypticZA

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
3,046
What differences are you seeing vs non-warp? Curious as I was recently looking into the premium option. But couldn't see anything/findings for us local peeps.
So i use the old wireguard method and it still gives me warp+ for free haha where a friend uses their app and at times we have seen routes be slightly different where my route had slightly better latency but it has been a rare sight. I almost always would go via WACS where sometimes she would go via a slightly longer route and hit London with 160ms
 

CrypticZA

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
3,046
Nah this is premium. Though to be honest I've traced quite a few routes with a free account and premium and there is zero difference.

Lately I haven't seen latency even to London below about 170-180ms.
What is the IP i'll just check on my side for interest sake?
 

Seeyou

Expert Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,705
What is the IP i'll just check on my side for interest sake?

I'm gonna have to jot down some server IPs when I play again. Pinging the London lobby server gives me 142ms. But in-game it has consistently been minimum 173ms going all the way up to 200ms of late. Actually cancelled my subscription from next month because it's been so poor.
 

bHOLDher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
413
Something seems a bit broken to teams.microsoft.com? Sometimes showing the same IP in the trace:
Code:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |
|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
|                             192.168.3.2 -    0 |  298 |  298 |    0 |    0 |    1 |    0 |
|                             154.0.0.113 -    0 |  298 |  298 |    2 |    2 |    4 |    3 |
|                             154.0.4.194 -    0 |  298 |  298 |    2 |    2 |    4 |    3 |
|                      Request timed out. -  100 |   59 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |
|                             154.0.4.194 -   81 |   71 |   14 |    0 |    2 |    3 |    2 |
|                      Request timed out. -  100 |   59 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |
|                          196.223.14.173 -   38 |  119 |   74 |    2 |    5 |   23 |    3 |
|         ae21-0.icr01.jnb20.ntwk.msn.net -   77 |   73 |   17 |    3 |    6 |   21 |    7 |
|       be-100-0.ibr01.jnb20.ntwk.msn.net -   70 |   79 |   24 |    3 |    6 |   23 |    3 |
|                          196.223.14.173 -   87 |   67 |    9 |    0 |   18 |   23 |   23 |
|        ae100-0.icr01.cpt20.ntwk.msn.net -   51 |   99 |   49 |    0 |   20 |   60 |    3 |
|      ae27-0.cpt02-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net -   28 |  141 |  102 |    4 |   23 |   48 |   22 |
|                          13.104.186.208 -   20 |  167 |  134 |    2 |   21 |   36 |    3 |
|      ae27-0.cpt02-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net -   66 |   83 |   29 |    0 |   22 |   24 |   23 |
|                             154.0.4.194 -   71 |   78 |   23 |    0 |   15 |   32 |    3 |
|                          13.104.186.208 -   96 |   62 |    3 |    0 |   24 |   27 |   27 |
|                          52.113.194.132 -   36 |  123 |   79 |    0 |   20 |   33 |    3 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
   WinMTR v1.00 GPLv2 (original by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider)
 

cavedog

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
22,661
What differences are you seeing vs non-warp? Curious as I was recently looking into the premium option. But couldn't see anything/findings for us local peeps.

Nah this is premium. Though to be honest I've traced quite a few routes with a free account and premium and there is zero difference.

Lately I haven't seen latency even to London below about 170-180ms.

Well there is 1 big difference. Torrents. On Warp+ it's max speed where with free it's slow.

So i use the old wireguard method and it still gives me warp+ for free haha where a friend uses their app and at times we have seen routes be slightly different where my route had slightly better latency but it has been a rare sight. I almost always would go via WACS where sometimes she would go via a slightly longer route and hit London with 160ms

Yeah this works but there is also the difference between ipv4 and ipv6 routes.
 

Seeyou

Expert Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,705
What is the IP i'll just check on my side for interest sake?

Yeah, something weird's going on. Just played a game - my in-game ping was above 200ms. The trace resolves to this, with an expected ping. Not sure what to make of it:

Code:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |
|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
|                              172.16.0.1 -    0 |    2 |    2 |    1 |    1 |    1 |    1 |
|                            172.68.185.1 -    0 |    2 |    2 |    1 |    1 |    1 |    1 |
|                          197.157.64.174 -    0 |    2 |    2 |    1 |    1 |    1 |    1 |
|                   No response from host -    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |
|                cr1-amx-et42.wolcomm.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  141 |  141 |  141 |  141 |
|                           212.119.4.176 -    0 |    2 |    2 |  141 |  141 |  141 |  141 |
|    ae-12.r21.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  145 |  145 |  146 |  146 |
|    ae-16.r20.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  154 |  154 |  155 |  154 |
|     ae-0.r21.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  157 |  157 |  157 |  157 |
|     ae-8.r00.lxmblc01.lu.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  158 |  158 |  159 |  158 |
|ae-9-2644.r00.lxmblc01.lu.ce.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  162 |  164 |  166 |  162 |
|                          188.42.168.223 -    0 |    2 |    2 |  162 |  164 |  166 |  162 |
|                           188.42.42.118 -    0 |    2 |    2 |  161 |  161 |  162 |  162 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
   WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider
 

breezy1337

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2022
Messages
1
I'm getting 190ms to London servers, where it used to be 155ms. It's only been like this since this morning for me. What's going on?

Edit: I'm in Cape Town
 

cavedog

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
22,661
We don't have access to IPV6 ;)

Cloudflare does it for you. They now do the 6to4 automatically on Warp if you use their app or if you use wireguard just add the v6 local address prefix. scratch that looks like it's a cloudflare public generated prefix in the config.
 

Seeyou

Expert Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,705
Yeah, something weird's going on. Just played a game - my in-game ping was above 200ms. The trace resolves to this, with an expected ping. Not sure what to make of it:

Code:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |
|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
|                              172.16.0.1 -    0 |    2 |    2 |    1 |    1 |    1 |    1 |
|                            172.68.185.1 -    0 |    2 |    2 |    1 |    1 |    1 |    1 |
|                          197.157.64.174 -    0 |    2 |    2 |    1 |    1 |    1 |    1 |
|                   No response from host -    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |
|                cr1-amx-et42.wolcomm.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  141 |  141 |  141 |  141 |
|                           212.119.4.176 -    0 |    2 |    2 |  141 |  141 |  141 |  141 |
|    ae-12.r21.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  145 |  145 |  146 |  146 |
|    ae-16.r20.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  154 |  154 |  155 |  154 |
|     ae-0.r21.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  157 |  157 |  157 |  157 |
|     ae-8.r00.lxmblc01.lu.bb.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  158 |  158 |  159 |  158 |
|ae-9-2644.r00.lxmblc01.lu.ce.gin.ntt.net -    0 |    2 |    2 |  162 |  164 |  166 |  162 |
|                          188.42.168.223 -    0 |    2 |    2 |  162 |  164 |  166 |  162 |
|                           188.42.42.118 -    0 |    2 |    2 |  161 |  161 |  162 |  162 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
   WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider

I don't get the same behaviour through my London VPS. 140-150ms pings. Unless CF is prioritising by traffic type now.
 

CrypticZA

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
3,046
I don't get the same behaviour through my London VPS. 140-150ms pings. Unless CF is prioritising by traffic type now.
That IP address is in Luxemburg

Connection is going London -> Paris -> Luxemburg

LON - PAR - LUX

A lookup of the IP confirms the location

1670501093649.png

CISP gives me 158 and warp gives me 162ms which is accurate for that region i know since Dota 2 EU servers are in the location

EDIT* Warp just takes you via Amsterdam as well so thats where the extra latency comes from so not sure?
 
Last edited:

Soprono

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Messages
1,625
Well there is 1 big difference. Torrents. On Warp+ it's max speed where with free it's slow.



Yeah this works but there is also the difference between ipv4 and ipv6 routes.

Yeah, I'm on NZB's already so that solves max speed ect. I was just curious overall about it and what differences the guys see that would make it worth it for them :)

Im very rarely on an international lobby besides for my sim racing but as you know, when you see something that sounds cool and gets traction you always wonder what the returns are even when we most likely dont need it :D
 

KoolKop

Active Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2022
Messages
34
OK so Openserve finally released the line, CI took over. Now I have to wait 24-48 hours for the router. They said I can use another router in the meantime and gave me the ppoe stuff.

Since the ONT works as a router too, can I use that? And if so, how? Because I can't seem to access the thing. I've tried wireless, wired, made sure of no proxy. Made sure of ip 192.168.100.1, made static ip and used the above as gateway, even hard reset it etc, still can't connect to the thing...?
 

Seeyou

Expert Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,705
That IP address is in Luxemburg

Connection is going London -> Paris -> Luxemburg

LON - PAR - LUX

A lookup of the IP confirms the location

View attachment 1437563

CISP gives me 158 and warp gives me 162ms which is accurate for that region i know since Dota 2 EU servers are in the location

EDIT* Warp just takes you via Amsterdam as well so thats where the extra latency comes from so not sure?

Yeah, it looks like ping latency is far lower than in-game latency when using WARP for me. I thought it was perhaps the Apex hamster servers, but I don't get the same results on my own VPS+Wireguard solution, which is why I'm wondering if WARP has started prioritising traffic by type.
 

Seeyou

Expert Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,705
OK so Openserve finally released the line, CI took over. Now I have to wait 24-48 hours for the router. They said I can use another router in the meantime and gave me the ppoe stuff.

Since the ONT works as a router too, can I use that? And if so, how? Because I can't seem to access the thing. I've tried wireless, wired, made sure of no proxy. Made sure of ip 192.168.100.1, made static ip and used the above as gateway, even hard reset it etc, still can't connect to the thing...?

Connect your PC directly to the ONT via network cable. Reset all the changes you made above. Create a new PPPoE connection in Windows with the login details CISP gave you, using automatically assigned IP / DNS, then dial it.
 

TheLostPacket

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2019
Messages
173
OK so Openserve finally released the line, CI took over. Now I have to wait 24-48 hours for the router. They said I can use another router in the meantime and gave me the ppoe stuff.

Since the ONT works as a router too, can I use that? And if so, how? Because I can't seem to access the thing. I've tried wireless, wired, made sure of no proxy. Made sure of ip 192.168.100.1, made static ip and used the above as gateway, even hard reset it etc, still can't connect to the thing...?
No, you cant use the ONT as a router because it doesnt dial the pppoe connection. It purely acts as a fibre to copper conversion. You need a router to dial the pppoe, or you can use you laptop and have it dial the connection when plugged directly into the ONT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top