HartsockZA
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2015
- Messages
- 1,458
Ah God the fcking hippies are back.... look I understand nuclear but gas power is 2nd to that of nuclear.....
Karpowerships are gas engines.
Yup, but a very bad deal
For many reasons, perhaps yes. But financially as an IPP they are delivering what they were asked to deliver in a price per kWh for the next 20 years. And in that respect their prices were cheaper or pretty similar to everyone else’s bidding in the programme.
I haven’t seen the same talk about price per kWh for the Scatec solar farm for example and the profits from that place are going to Norway for the next 20 years.
It’s what IPPs do. They give you power, we pay them for it.
I'm not sure "engines" ( I assume you mean spark ignition, gas powered, piston engines) can run as low as 10%, efficiently anyway. Maybe 50% (GE Jenbacher). Snag with gas engines is reducing power but at constant rpm to maintain the generation frequency. The attraction of gas from a pipeline (as I understand it) is that start up time (engine or turbine) is relatively quick and only limited storage is needed. Gas engines producing more than 10MW are limited and turbines start to be come efficient after this. Could have changed though.I’m not sure what you are saying “no” to as I’ve covered a couple of points. But sorry it’s late and I’m also not reading all that
Suffice to say the article you link to is talking about turbines which I’ve already said are inefficient. When I talk about gas I’m talking about engines. Engines which can run at 10% or 100% as required. Like the Karpowerships.
The reality is other IPPs have not had so much concerns with their projects.
Maybe I bought into the public narrative but everything from successful court challenges to the way they originally acquired certain government approvals, along with a record of involvement in international corruption does not sit well with me. Karpowership have done nothing to ease the concerns of the South African citizen.
If they can successfully, legally and with open book aquire the required approvals and have Eskom be 100% confident then I'd happily support them.
.
I'm not sure "engines" ( I assume you mean spark ignition, gas powered, piston engines) can run as low as 10%, efficiently anyway. Maybe 50% (GE Jenbacher). Snag with gas engines is reducing power but at constant rpm to maintain the generation frequency. The attraction of gas from a pipeline (as I understand it) is that start up time (engine or turbine) is relatively quick and only limited storage is needed. Gas engines producing more than 10MW are limited and turbines start to be come efficient after this. Could have changed though.
However, she doesn’t believe it’s appropriate to make load-shedding the focus of the court hearing.
She said the hearing is about the need and desirability for such a gas-to-power plant in this day and age while the country is basically on a decarbonisation path.
So what happened to the 12Bill germany gave us to get rid of coal?
Experience from south Australia has proven over the last 10 years that battery packs are also effective.
And their running costs are not linked to a highly manipulated oil and gas market.
Turbines cannot adapt dynamically to the demand. They run at 100% all the time whereas gas engines can increase or decrease the load instantly which is important when we consider renewables and their inconsistent nature.
But Karpowerships are like any other IPP and they gave a price per kWh over a 20 year period as per the governments requirements. And as much as I think it’s a terrible solution for any number of reasons, their prices are pretty low compared to the other solutions awarded contracts in the emergency power programme.
I’m not sure what you are saying “no” to as I’ve covered a couple of points. But sorry it’s late and I’m also not reading all that
Suffice to say the article you link to is talking about turbines which I’ve already said are inefficient. When I talk about gas I’m talking about engines. Engines which can run at 10% or 100% as required. Like the Karpowerships.
If SA switched entirely over to natural gas fracked from the Karoo
Not LiFePO4.That big battery? It caught fire and took three days just to get the fire under control. Lithium fires are extremely difficult to extinguish.
View attachment 1359521
A large blaze at Victoria’s “big battery” project has been brought under control by firefighters after burning for more than three days, allowing investigators to begin examining the site.
A Tesla battery bank caught fire while it was being set up in Moorabool on Friday morning, and then spread to a second battery.
The fire burned throughout the weekend and into a fourth day, before it was declared under control just after 3pm on Monday.
![]()
Tesla big battery fire in Victoria under control after burning more than three days
Firefighters say blaze that began during testing on Friday has been particularly challenging as it is the first mega pack fire in the worldwww.theguardian.com
fracking should frack off.You're going to pay out all the farmers and supply the towns with many tanker trucks daily for those who rely on boreholes for water in the Karoo? There is no surface water and poisoning the aquifers will turn the Karoo into what it was before borehole technology got there - An uninhabited wasteland.