Nowhere in there does it say that there is an efficacy threshold which a vaccine must meet to be called a vaccine, which was your original contention.
if the operation is only to reduce an already low 2% chance of dying from your condition ... would you honestly call it "life saving"? would you go for it?
A 2% possibility of death would not be referred to as a life saving operation. Life saving operations are required when there is a very high possibility of death, you know it kinda is described as such...
now reflect on the fact that the virus itself in the case of covid only has a 2% chance of killing people in general ...
I mean, I wouldn't recommend it, but I kinda wanna see you try
Yeah and the 0.0018% from vaccines, amirite.
life saving operation, that was your analogy, you would not take it for a mere 2% risk, even if it reduces that risk
You know that link went to a link?
The 50% efficacy threshold set for COVID-19 vaccines is because COVID-19 was deemed such a severe disease, that if a vaccine is only 50% effective, it’s still worth using. Fortunately, the emerging data on COVID-19 vaccines suggests that the vaccines are very safe with high efficacy, at least against some of the variants.
What is COVID-19 vaccine efficacy?
In an incredible scientific feat, COVID-19 vaccines have been developed within less than a year after the virus was first detected. Several vaccines that have become available have shown different levels of efficacy. So what is vaccine efficacy? Dr Lee Hampton, a paediatrician and medical...www.afro.who.int
Whatever you want, your experience in being an idiot or moron is way beyond what I could ever achieve in my lifetime.
For reference, those are the official Chinese claimed results out of a single party state that is known to control the narrative. They are not peer reviewed.
So far we're at ~200m official cases of Covid, so 1:40, that includes that a large number of people in the world are now being vaccinated, lockdowns, etc.
Guy, you really lack lateral thinking. Are you going to catch diabetes, the need for a coronary bypass from standing in a queue? It might be a mere 2%, but that number is currently 4.16M, if you want to potentially join the statistic go ahead, nobody is stopping you. You can tell us how big man you are when you're stuck on a ventilator gasping for air.
But you just posted a WHO expose on how they themselves verified it.
No, they validated it for official use, they did not validate the claims.
For example the EU and the FDA do not recognize the Chinese vaccine as a valid immunization.
It will get challenged in court.
I know I have done it in the past, but I feel like I've grown. Playing the man is so bc.
ditto for vaccine deaths and side effects ...
You missed the VAERS quote then, serious symptoms are over-reported. If you take a vaccine, you're generally monitored. If you die of Covid in a township, you're probably going to be buried somewhere and that's the end of that.
you are on the side of doing exactly what the popular opinion is ... yet we lack lateral thinking? do you see the irony there?
refer to the title of this thread, it is shyte like that which gets people annoyed
So because it's the popular opinion it must be wrong? Great argument. Keep hearing the Big Pharma BS/news is captured, etc., yet no proof of it or reasoning as to why except "money" when Big Pharma already makes a lot of money in other ways and would be pretty much destroyed if the vaccine had negative repercussions by now considering the amount of testing/scrutiny going through it and the public backlash.
no that argument is one you just conjured all by yourself