K
kingrob
Guest
No, we know habitual liars claim that there's Russian tanks inside Ukraine. Big difference.
So you are saying a few locals can just come together and beat a professional army back with sticks and stones?
No, we know habitual liars claim that there's Russian tanks inside Ukraine. Big difference.
In case you've forgotten, many of the rebels were part of the Ukrainian army before the civil war started. There was also a lot of Ukrainian military hardware in the eastern half of the country. So claiming that they were armed with "sticks and stones" is rather ridiculous.So you are saying a few locals can just come together and beat a professional army back with sticks and stones?
Ah, so you both admit you cannot prove the Russians shot down MH-17. Thanks, that's all I ever sought to prove.
So in other words you cannot prove your assertions. Thanks.Nope, there is more than enough evidence that the airliner was shot down by a Russian BUK operated by a Russian officer.
But the people offering the reward need a lot more information than that, and the Russians have probably already destroyed most of that information.
Almost as well as I know how desperate people have to be to selectively quote half a sentence.I am sure you know yourself very well.![]()
So in other words you cannot prove your assertions. Thanks.
But you cannot prove it.Nope, not what I said, the Russians did it, no doubt whatsoever.
Almost as well as I know how desperate people have to be to selectively quote half a sentence.
But you cannot prove it.
Funny, if what I was saying was so ridiculous it ought to be easy to show where and how I am wrong. But instead you only resort to ad-hominems.That was the only part of any of your posts in this thread that resembled an ounce of sense or reality!
In case you've forgotten, many of the rebels were part of the Ukrainian army before the civil war started. There was also a lot of Ukrainian military hardware in the eastern half of the country. So claiming that they were armed with "sticks and stones" is rather ridiculous.
I don't have to. I'm not the one claiming definite knowledge as to who the guilty party is.Neither can you disprove it or prove the Ukrainians did it. How idiotic!
Funny, if what I was saying was so ridiculous it ought to be easy to show where and how I am wrong. But instead you only resort to ad-hominems.
Much like Merkel and Hollande stating they have no proof of Russian tanks in Ukraine, I imagine.Is it now a civil war? That's news to me.
Ask them?Why didn't people just go to the polls and vote for their leader?
Lol. If you think you got the better end of this exchange then clearly you're the one who's delusional.I understand, Your hardons for putin clouds yours senses but do not worry we all know it by now! Carry on as normal, we love to read how people make fools of themselves.
I don't have to. I'm not the one claiming definite knowledge as to who the guilty party is.
Lol. If you think you got the better end of this exchange then clearly you're the one who's delusional.![]()
I agree. Many idiots are indeed claiming to have definite knowledge as to who shot down MH-17.Yeah I know, many idiots are claiming the same!
I agree. Many idiots are indeed claiming to have definite knowledge as to who shot down MH-17.