Crisis in Ukraine

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
FRANCE SAYS PUTIN 'STILL INVITED' TO D-DAY CEREMONIES

Russian President Vladimir Putin is still invited to D-day commemorations in France on June 6 despite the Ukraine crisis, Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said Tuesday.

"President Putin has been invited ... and for the moment he remains invited," Fabius said on Europe 1 radio.

Fabius said however he had cancelled a planned trip to Moscow Tuesday with Defence Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian to meet their Russian counterparts. His ministry earlier said the trip would depend on the "evolving situation" in Ukraine.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Mar 2014 10:33
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
UKRAINIANS CONFIDENT TENSE EAST WILL NOT SPLINTER

=(VIDEO)=

Crimea's impending attachment to Russia has raised concerns Ukraine may splinter further, but pro-unity activists in its Russian-speaking east are increasingly confident a referendum in their region would fail.

Despite ominous days of violence in ethnic-Russian majority Donetsk and Kharkiv ahead of Sunday's vote in Crimea, tensions in the eastern cities have since eased somewhat.

"I definitely don't think Russia will invade Donetsk. It will remain a region of Ukraine," said Sergiy Garmash, an activist at the pro-European website ostro.org.

Thousands of pro-Russian protesters rallied Sunday in the east to demand their own Crimea-style vote but while a referendum was still possible in Donetsk, the wording would be different to the one in the strategic Black Sea peninsula, Garmash said.

"There will be no question on joining Russia, but rather about federalisation or most likely on more autonomy," he told AFP.

"Opinions have changed. A week ago, more people supported pro-Russian ideas, but day by day there are fewer people doing so.

"People see that pro-Russian forces lead to chaos, they attack government buildings, shed people's blood, but people want peace and stability, not war," he said.

Oleksiy Matsuka, chief editor of online news site Novosti Donbassa, agreed.

"If the question is 'do you support a friendly relationship with Russia?' most of the people would say 'yes'," he told AFP.

"But if you ask 'do you want Donbass (the Donetsk region) as a territory of the Russian Federation, the vast majority of people will say 'no'.

"They would want to stay part of the sovereign state of Ukraine and wouldn't support the breakup of our country."

Ukraine's eastern cities saw last week the bloodiest violence since a popular uprising toppled pro-Moscow president Viktor Yanukovych last month.

But Nataliya Todorova, an academic and pro-Ukrainian activist, said those behind the violence were a noisy minority.

"The majority of people don't go out and shout. Nobody wants a war," said Todorova, who teaches business at Donetsk National Technical University.

She cited a poll this month by the Democratic Initiatives Foundation, a non-governmental organisation, that showed only one third of people in the Donetsk region backed union with Russia.

"Since independence, a whole generation has grown up under freedom, which they are not willing to give up," she explained.

But Matsuka also said there was a growing sense of a need for stability among people in blue-collar industrial Donetsk.

Pro-Ukrainians were staying indoors because "there is a great danger of provocation and that the violent reaction by pro-Russians will be repeated," he said.

Last week, a 22-year-old pro-Kiev protester was stabbed and killed in Donetsk during clashes with pro-Russian demonstrators.

Since then, the threat of more violence had eased because border guards had stopped the flow of "Russian extremists" into Ukraine, according to Matsuka.

But the security situation was still unclear given the inaction of the regional Kiev-appointed administration, headed by oligarch Sergiy Taruta.

"We don't understand whose interests they serve," said Garmash.

"We have a situation where the Russian flag has been flying on the main square of Donetsk for a week and nobody is replacing it, and this shows something."

For Todorova, this inaction was due to Ukraine's eastern elites wanting to maintain the status quo.

"Those in power don't understand that the protesters (in Kiev) were just seeking a better life," she said.

"Those in power, including the police, are either trying to sabotage (the process of reforms) or they are too scared of losing their jobs.

"But we are trying to be optimistic. This is our land and we have no other place to live."


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Mar 2014 11:37
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
Ukraine should just cut off all electricity and water supplies to Crimea immediately until they admit maybe they are not so independent after all! :D
 

XennoX

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
2,205
Knowing Putin he'd probably see that as a provocation, using reasoning like "They [the Ukrainians] were denying them [the Crimeans] basic human rights!"
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
BIDEN IN POLAND AS RUSSIA TIGHTENS GRIP ON CRIMEA

US Vice President Joe Biden arrived in Poland for talks with regional allies Tuesday as Russia tightened its grip on the Ukraine's breakaway region of Crimea.

Biden will hold talks with Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski and Prime Minister Donald Tusk, as well as the presidents of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania -- meeting the latter two in Vilnius on Wednesday.

The White House has said the talks will focus on "steps to support Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and affirm our collective defence commitments under the North Atlantic Treaty".

Lithuanian Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevicius said Biden's visit was "a clear signal to those who are interested in destabilising the situation in the region".

"We see his visit as yet further proof that NATO allies, and notably the US, are keeping up their commitment to collective defence," he told Lithuanian national radio.

The events in Crimea have rattled nerves in Poland and the three Baltic states, which were all under Moscow's thumb before the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Mar 2014 11:44
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
UKRAINE HAS NO PLANS TO JOIN NATO: PM

Ukraine's new Western-backed prime minister said on Tuesday that his ex-Soviet country had no plans to join NATO following last month's fall in Kiev of a pro-Kremlin regime.

Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk said in a televised address to the nation that "for the sole purpose of preserving the unity of Ukraine, the issue of (Ukraine's) accession to NATO is not on the agenda."

"The country will be defended by a strong and modern Ukrainian army," Yatsenyuk said.

The new premier -- in power since the February 22 ouster of Moscow-back president Viktor Yanukovych -- is still due to sign in Brussels on Friday the political portion of a landmark EU pact whose rejection by the deposed government in November sparked protests that led to its fall.

Yatsenyuk's comments came as Russian President Vladimir Putin took the first steps to absorb the Ukrainian region after a disputed weekend referendum in which an overwhelming majority of voters backed the Black Sea peninsula splitting from Ukraine and joining Russia.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Mar 2014 12:09
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
FRANCE: RUSSIA SUSPENDED FROM G-8

France's foreign minister says that leaders of the Group of Eight world powers have suspended Russia's participation in the club amid tensions over Ukraine and Russia's incursion into Crimea.

The other seven members of the group had already suspended preparations for a G-8 summit that Russia is scheduled to host in June in Sochi.

France's Laurent Fabius went further Tuesday, saying on Europe-1 radio that "concerning the G-8 ... we decided to suspend Russia's participation, and it is envisaged that all the other countries, the seven leading countries, will unite without Russia."

Fabius did not give further details.

The U.S. and European Union on Tuesday announced new sanctions against Russia over its actions in the Crimean Peninsula.


Source : Sapa-AP /mr
Date : 18 Mar 2014 12:38
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
RUSSIA, US SEEK TO FORGET UKRAINE FOR IRAN NUCLEAR TALKS

Russia, the United States and other world powers tried to put their sharp differences over Ukraine to one side on Tuesday as they kicked off the latest nuclear talks with Iran in Vienna.

The gathering is the second in a series of meetings aiming to transform by July a November interim deal into a lasting accord that resolves for good the decade-old standoff and removes the threat of war.

So far, despite disagreements over the Syria conflict and other issues, the six powers have shown a united front over Iran, but events in Ukraine in recent weeks have precipitated the worst crisis in East-West relations since the Cold War.

Following Sunday's referendum in Crimea -- slammed as a sham by the White House and the European Union -- Brussels and Washington on Monday issued the first sanctions against a handful of Russian officials.

Already downbeat about prospects for a deal with Iran, Mark Fitzpatrick, a former US State Department official now at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, said the unfolding crisis made him "even more pessimistic".

"The Russians will ... be less likely to make sacrifices for the sake of unity over the Iran issues," Fitzpatrick told AFP. The Iranians, he said, "now have more reason to wait out the six powers".

A senior US administration official involved in the Iran talks said last week that diplomats "hoped that the incredibly difficult situation in Ukraine will not create issues for this negotiation".

Even before the Ukraine crisis erupted, Russian President Vladimir Putin was reported to be discussing a major deal with Tehran whereby Moscow would get Iranian oil in exchange for money, goods and help in building new nuclear reactors.

This would undermine Washington's efforts to cut off Iran's main source of revenue -- a strategy which the US credits with forcing Tehran to the negotiating table in the first place.

Mark Hibbs from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said this "huge barter deal" is a "carrot Moscow can dangle constructively to wrestle more concessions from Iran."

"Or it can move forward unilaterally and damage the negotiation," Hibbs told AFP. "Up to Putin to choose."

Even without the spat over Ukraine, agreeing a lasting deal will be tough for Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, known as the P5+1.

Under November's agreement, Iran froze key parts of its nuclear programme in return for minor sanctions relief and a promise of no new sanctions.

Although it could be extended, the deal is currently due to expire on July 20.

Iran has not permanently dismantled a single piece of atomic equipment. The bulk of UN and Western sanctions remain in place, depriving Iran of billions of dollars in lost oil revenues every week.

The six powers now want Iran to reduce permanently -- or at least for a long time -- the scope of its nuclear activities in order to make it extremely difficult for Tehran to develop nuclear weapons.

This would likely include Iran slashing the number of centrifuges "enriching" uranium -- which can be used for peaceful purposes and in a bomb, if highly purified -- and allowing tougher UN inspections.

In addition, Iran might have to change the new reactor being built at Arak to a kind that makes the extraction of plutonium -- the alternative to uranium for a bomb -- much more difficult.

But even though in return Iran would see sanctions lifted, it remains far from certain whether ultra-conservative elements in Tehran around supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would accept such limitations.

Any deal that leaves some of Iran's nuclear infrastructure intact would also be a hard sell to US conservatives and to Israel, the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear power.

"The final agreement will fall short of both sides' ideals," said Ali Vaez, Iran expert at the International Crisis Group.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Mar 2014 12:35
 

Compton_effect

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
12,292
Wow. Just a few weeks ago there were articles on how European aerospace companies were buying Russian as they didn't trust American hardware. now... Cold War 2. :wtf:
 

R13...

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
46,547
I think I am in agreement with the analysts who say the west is hypocritical here. They had no problems with referenda elsewhere in the world yet they're all up in arms on this one because they don't agree with Russia?
 

Mortymoose

Honorary Master
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
13,287
Not Pro Russian either, But if more than 70% of your population want to join the motherland, then so be it....

The EU had become a toothless beast, threatening sanctions..... do the idiots not realise where a chink of their energy needs are sourced from.......
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
I think I am in agreement with the analysts who say the west is hypocritical here. They had no problems with referenda elsewhere in the world yet they're all up in arms on this one because they don't agree with Russia?

Bit more complicated than that, though. It's not necessarily the referendum itself, but the issues surrounding it and the context within which it took place. The region has a complicated history, as well.

If Limpopo decides to secede and join Zimbabwe, shouldn't the people of South Africa as a whole have a say? What about people who have property or business interests there, for example?
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
Which other referendums took place in the presence of an armed occupying army?
 

Garson007

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
11,838
If Limpopo decides to secede and join Zimbabwe, shouldn't the people of South Africa as a whole have a say? What about people who have property or business interests there, for example?
If China told us they'd enforce the referendum, we would have no recourse but to accept.

I know I keep repeating it, but might makes right.
 

Jola

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
20,124
I think I am in agreement with the analysts who say the west is hypocritical here. They had no problems with referenda elsewhere in the world yet they're all up in arms on this one because they don't agree with Russia?

So the WC can become independent of the RSA ? Same principle.
 

R13...

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
46,547
So the WC can become independent of the RSA ? Same principle.
South Africa doesn't allow referenda but I suspect if war broke out like in Sudan and the only resolution was a referendum to see if they want to split I suspect it may be allowed.

Which other referendums took place in the presence of an armed occupying army?
They have always been there allowed by Ukraine's agreements with Russia.

Bit more complicated than that, though. It's not necessarily the referendum itself, but the issues surrounding it and the context within which it took place. The region has a complicated history, as well.

If Limpopo decides to secede and join Zimbabwe, shouldn't the people of South Africa as a whole have a say? What about people who have property or business interests there, for example?
Same as for WC above.
 
Top