Unhappy438
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 24,915
he wants to tell you that the so called "invasion" will never happen.
I dont recall anyone offering up the opinion that an invasion will happen, seems hes just chatting schit again.
he wants to tell you that the so called "invasion" will never happen.
Don't be so sensitive.I dont recall anyone offering up the opinion that an invasion will happen, seems hes just chatting schit again.
Don't be so sensitive.
He (Obama) also warned of the possibility of further sanctions against Russia if it encroached further into Ukraine.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26746106
I think you are too simple .....
EU and US, they are already accepted the fact and will not do anything IF russia will not do anything "further".
understand?
what?
you don't need to be a condensing arse. Just stick to the issues.
The EU have already stated that they accelerating alternatives to their imports of Russian oil and gas. So there is more to come. Once these alternatives are secured, they will stop the import of Russian and gas. In other words. There is more to come. In addition, all NATO countries are reconsidering their defence spending. All military co-operation with Russia has been suspended. The British Forces Germany is reconsidering scaling down their presence in Germany. Full withdrawal was planned by the end of 2019.
And NATO is beefing up defences in the Baltic
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/cameron-nato-baltics-states-defences-ukraine-crisis
From local sources, VOA has learned that the Russian military has established a field hospital in the Bryansk region, about 20 kilometers from the Russia-Ukraine border, that some 60 train cars have arrived near the border with supplies and that the frontier is being patrolled by more than a dozen Russian drones.
The information provided to VOA could not be independently confirmed.
Obama vs. Putin: The mismatch
“The United States does not view Europe as a battleground between East and West, nor do we see the situation in Ukraine as a zero-sum game. That’s the kind of thinking that should have ended with the Cold War.”
Should. Lovely sentiment. As lovely as what Obama said five years ago to the United Nations: “No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation.”
That’s the kind of sentiment you expect from a Miss America contestant asked to name her fondest wish, not from the leader of the free world explaining his foreign policy.
The East Europeans know they inhabit the battleground between the West and a Russia that wants to return them to its sphere of influence. Ukrainians see tens of thousands of Russian troops across their border and know they are looking down the barrel of quite a zero-sum game.
Obama thinks otherwise. He says that Vladimir Putin’s kind of neo-imperialist thinking is a relic of the past — and advises Putin to transcend the Cold War.
Good God. Putin hasn’t transcended the Russian revolution. Did no one give Obama a copy of Putin’s speech last week upon the annexation of Crimea? Putin railed not only at Russia’s loss of empire in the 1990s. He went back to the 1920s: “After the revolution, the Bolsheviks . . . may God judge them, added large sections of the historical South of Russia to the Republic of Ukraine.” Putin was referring not to Crimea (which came two sentences later) but to his next potential target: Kharkiv and Donetsk and the rest of southeastern Ukraine.
Putin’s irredentist grievances go very deep. Obama seems unable to fathom them. Asked whether he’d misjudged Russia, whether it really is our greatest geopolitical foe, he disdainfully replied that Russia is nothing but “a regional power” acting “out of weakness.”
Where does one begin? Hitler’s Germany and Tojo’s Japan were also regional powers, yet managed to leave behind at least 50 million dead. And yes, Russia should be no match for the American superpower. Yet under this president, Russia has run rings around America, from the attempted ingratiation of the “reset” to America’s empty threats of “consequences” were Russia to annex Crimea.
Annex Crimea it did. For which the “consequences” have been risible. Numberless 19th- and 20th-century European soldiers died for Crimea. Putin conquered it in a swift and stealthy campaign that took three weeks and cost his forces not a sprained ankle. That’s “weakness”?
Indeed, Obama’s dismissal of Russia as a regional power makes his own leadership of the one superpower all the more embarrassing. For seven decades since the Japanese surrender, our role under 11 presidents had been as offshore balancer protecting smaller allies from potential regional hegemons.
What are the allies thinking now? Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines and other Pacific Rim friends are wondering where this America will be as China expands its reach and claims. The Gulf states are near panic as they see the United States playacting nuclear negotiations with Iran that, at best, will leave their mortal Shiite enemy just weeks away from the bomb.
America never sought the role that history gave it after World War II to bear unbidden burdens “to assure the survival and the success of liberty,” as movingly described by John Kennedy. We have an appropriate aversion to the stark fact that the alternative to U.S. leadership is either global chaos or dominance by the likes of China, Russia and Iran.
But Obama doesn’t even seem to recognize this truth. In his major Brussels address Wednesday, the very day Russia seized the last Ukrainian naval vessel in Crimea, Obama made vague references to further measures should Russia march deeper into Ukraine, while still emphasizing the centrality of international law, international norms and international institutions such as the United Nations.
Such fanciful thinking will leave our allies with two choices: bend a knee — or arm to the teeth. Either acquiesce to the regional bully or gird your loins, i.e., go nuclear. As surely will the Gulf states. As will, in time, Japan and South Korea.
Even Ukrainians are expressing regret at having given up their nukes in return for paper guarantees of territorial integrity. The 1994 Budapest Memorandum was ahead of its time — the perfect example of the kind of advanced 21st-century thinking so cherished by our president. Perhaps the captain of that last Ukrainian vessel should have waved the document at the Russian fleet that took his ship.
if russia is going to shut down the supply from tomorrow, I have no idea how those EU countries are going to survive from tomorrow.
but anyway, I don't think russia will do that and I am also very confident EU they are also not that stupid to do that.
What they are doing now that is just publicity stunt for some potential future NATO members.
Right, and if you believe that I have some excellent beach front property in Kansas to sell at bargain prices.ndeed, Obama’s dismissal of Russia as a regional power makes his own leadership of the one superpower all the more embarrassing. For seven decades since the Japanese surrender, our role under 11 presidents had been as offshore balancer protecting smaller allies from potential regional hegemons.
OBAMA SAYS RUSSIA MUST 'MOVE BACK' TROOPS
President Barack Obama in an interview aired Friday said Russia must "move back" its troops back from the Ukraine border and start negotiating with the international community.
Obama told CBS News that Russian President Vladimir Putin's decision to assemble forces on the border may "simply be an effort to intimidate Ukraine, or it may be that they've got additional plans."
Source : Sapa-AFP /nsm
Date : 28 Mar 2014 13:37
Rather interesting how the USA dictates what another world power may do within their own borders when US have strike groups deployed on near every border. This would be better should a body like the UN stated their opinion on the matter. Perhaps Russia is deploying troops to prevent a possible Ukrainian motive… who really knows.
Under the current condition, both the Ukrainians and Russians will be on alert.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...ce-on-Russia-offers-Ukraine-military-tie.html
If Russia shutdown the supply to the EU, they would also shutdown their own revenue. The EU isn't 100% reliant on Russia. Europe gets 40% of its gas from Russia. That is going to steadily decrease now. All contracts to add additional pipeline capacity from Russia has been cancelled. Over the next decade, EU is going to get their their gas from elsewhere and Russia is going to lose the revenue. Remember that US has become a net exporter of gas.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/26/europe-asks-obama-increased-exports-shale-gas