DreamKing
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 14,483
Crimea actually
that's good, then no one can revoke your visa (russia). (you don't need one actually.)
Crimea actually
Ukraine crisis: No sign of Russian troop pullout - Nato
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26830336#TWEET1087559
Kiev (AFP) - Ukraine's parliament on Tuesday approved a series of joint military exercises with NATO countries that would put US troops in direct proximity to Russian forces in the annexed Crimea peninsula.
In other reports, Russia only withdrawn ~20 000 troops, leaving ~40 000 within the border zones and with ~25 000 on the ready near inland should they need to bolster in regard with contingency.
What is interesting now is that Kiev is stating Russian troop pull backs and that NATO stated the situation as unchanged.
In other news:
http://news.yahoo.com/russian-pm-medvedev-visits-crimea-reports-075219445.html
Then on a more serious note, NATO may possibly place permanent military basis in the Baltic countries, breaking Russia/NATO agreements that they entered in the 1990’s, keeping NATO troops in countries bordering with Russia. Tensions may implode soon, only hoping that it may not involve any military actions.
Well, Russia broke all agreements regarding Crimea.
Are any agreements with the Russians worth the paper they where written on ?
An interesting read : http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svoboda_(political_party)
Especially the section ideology.
This is a party that forms part of the Ukrainian government....strange bedfellows for the EU and NATO
Especially the section ideology.
Some highlights :
In December 2012, the*European Parliament*expressed concern regarding Svoboda's growing support, recalling "that racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views go against theEU's fundamental values and principles," and appealed "to pro-democratic parties in theVerkhovna Rada*not to associate with, endorse or form coalitions with" Svoboda
Referencing a similar resolution made by the*NATO Parliamentary Assembly, Tyahnybok claimed it to be a result of a mud-slinging campaign by political opponents
Statements by Jewish organizations
Thirty members of the*Israeli*Knesset*condemned the party in a signed letter addressed to the President of the European Parliament. In the letter the Israeli politicians accused Svoboda of "openly glorifying Nazi murder" and "Nazi war criminals".[161]*In May 2013 theWorld Jewish Congress*labelled the party as "neo-Nazi" and called for European governments to ban them.[162]
They already broke that agreement, which is why Russia is acting this way.In other reports, Russia only withdrawn ~20 000 troops, leaving ~40 000 within the border zones and with ~25 000 on the ready near inland should they need to bolster in regard with contingency.
What is interesting now is that Kiev is stating Russian troop pull backs and that NATO stated the situation as unchanged.
In other news:
http://news.yahoo.com/russian-pm-medvedev-visits-crimea-reports-075219445.html
Then on a more serious note, NATO may possibly place permanent military basis in the Baltic countries, breaking Russia/NATO agreements that they entered in the 1990’s, keeping NATO troops in countries bordering with Russia. Tensions may implode soon, only hoping that it may not involve any military actions.
They already broke that agreement, which is why Russia is acting this way.
If i remember correctly, this was organised and agreed upon back in June last year.
I also remember NATO promised they would not extend to east, especially ukraine.
If i remember correctly, this was organised and agreed upon back in June last year.
NATO could break promise to Russia
On Tuesday, Kerry will join other NATO foreign ministers in Brussels where the alliance will confirm the suspension of cooperation with Moscow. The West views the annexation of Crimea as "illegal and illegitimate".
NATO has not ruled out the possibility of placing permanent military bases in the Baltic countries. This would break a promise made to Russia in the 1990s that NATO would keep permanent troops out of new member countries that border Russia.
"It is clear that Russia has not played by the rules, has not been consistent with our partnership... so we can review our own rules," Douglas Lute, the US ambassador to NATO, said on Monday.
A $1-billion-plus US aid package to Ukraine, which also imposes sanctions on Russia, is expected to clear Congress on Tuesday and be signed off by US President Barack Obama.
http://www.france24.com/en/20140331-russia-gradually-withdrawing-troops-ukraine-border/
I'm only quoting a relevant part.
Also as with other related articles.
They havent? Ukraine isnt part of NATO
yes, currently, but they want to.
Ok i was specifically referring to the training exercises, i think those were planned last year, in other words they aren't a direct result of Russia's aggression.
Ukraine wanting to join NATO obviously isnt the same as NATO trying to extend west (i dont think they actually do want to btw). As things stand, i dont see any signs that Ukraine will join NATO.
can you remain me what is the reason why the protestors were on Kiev’s Independence Square?
what they were doing there?
Yep, I understand. I am neutral on this matter as I do not generalise and condemn civilisations, actions on the other hand should be analysed and corrected to a certain extend. What really bother me is that we have in actual 5 parties here which is Russia, Crimea, Ukraine, NATO and the USA, it seems to me that every party is each on their own tone even though USA is with NATO. The media statements made by each country representatives don't line up with each other...
Asking Ukraine to join the EU , oh wait dont tell me you think they're the same thing?