HapticSimian
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Messages
- 15,950
I hope you are right about the up. I cant seem to find any info on local media regarding launch
Will IOL Motoring suffice?
Haha my bad. Ill see if I can ring up the Suzuki salesman that sold us the swift at that time. Maybe he was a chop and fed us wrong info. But any-case the Suzukis are very well built and talking out of experience very reliable. Swift had no problems since 2008 and SX4 from 2012. They just a bit on the expensive side on maintenance, service parts etc.
Lol thanx. It doesnt look as good as the mazda 2.i am confused now
http://www.iol.co.za/motoring/cars/toyota/toyota-reveals-daring-new-aygo-1.1656249#.VL6L4yP8JDsYeah Bull**** sales man.
But you can't go wrong with a properly Japanese car either from Honda or Suzuki or Daihatsu or Toyota and Subaru.
They just don't make bad cars.
Well, The Mazda2 pushes the R175k mark, not so? You won't even be able to spec an Up! to that level. I will say though that the VW looks quite fetching in the metal. It cuts a rather unique shape; in white it looks like it should be sold exclusively from iStores.Wait, I don't like Apple...
Nearly ALL of the sub-R120,000 to R 150,000 cars available in South Africa ARE sourced from India.
This INCLUDES the Suzuki Swift - which gets a much lower NCAP safety rating, compared to its European version (made in Hungary).
Euro-spec (Made in Hungary) Suzuki Swift:
http://www.euroncap.com/results/suzuki/swift.aspx
http://www.euroncap.com/results/suzuki/swift/2010/403.aspx
Latin-spec (Made in India) Maruti-Suzuki Swift:
http://www.latinncap.com/data/pdf/suzuki_swift_2airbags_en.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWUfSrbKDys
Also note the substantial differences in frontal impact protection offered in the 2 different versions:
Frontal impact cross-members of Euro-Spec Swift: (notice the solid metal crossmembers and impact absorbing foam)
View attachment 184494
Frontal impact cross-members of India-Spec Swift: (notice the two sets of thin metal tubes and LACK of ANY impact absorbing foam)
View attachment 184496
Many cars have been built in India for many years now.
Made in India does not equal Indian-spec just like Made in China doesn't make Apple devices Chinese spec.
I'm not saying you are wrong, but also don't make assumption based on where something comes from.
The popular Maruti Suzuki Swift and the Datsun Go have failed the latest round of Indian crash tests carried out by Global NCAP.
The Go is an entry-level model, which competes with Maruti Suzuki's Alto800 and Hyundai Eon, while the Swift is positioned as a more premium hatchback.
The Swift has received a zero star rating in the 64km/h frontal collision test.
Two variants of the car were tested - one exported by Maruti to Latin America and another which sells as the base variant here in India.
Latin American market regulations mean that car's base variant too has airbags/ABS, while in India neither is standard.
Global NCAP's testing protocol mandates that all cars (including base variants) must carry at least airbags and ABS to get its certification; and so on that count alone the Indian Swift model failed the test even before the crash happened.
The crash analysis showed the crash-test-dummies having sustained near-fatal injuries, more so in the case of the driver. The car's structural integrity was also deemed as unstable.
And this is a key point, given the made-in-Europe Swift has a much sturdier structure and had achieved a 5-Star crash certification from Euro-NCAP.
The Latin American export Swift got a 3-Star rating, chiefly due to the presence of airbags/ABS, which meant fewer injuries to the crash-test-dummies. But structurally that car performed similarly to the other Swift.
But it isn't just about adding airbags or ABS, as the Datsun Go's crash test shows. The car's body shell disintegrated severely during the same kind of test.
Of course the lack of airbags further compounded the potential injuries. The driver and passenger dummies sustained fatal injuries to the head, torso and legs.
Last year Global NCAP had carried out the first round of India tests, where the Tata Nano, Hyundai i10, Maruti Alto800, Ford Figo and VW Polo had been crashed.
None of the cars had passed due to a lack of airbags as standard, with the smaller cars faring poorly on build quality too.
The focus of these tests is to create awareness amongst Indian consumers, and also suggest the adoption of safety protocols by the government.
Very often manufacturers claim they don't offer safety features in base versions due to 'lack of demand' by consumers.
PS: All manufacturers whose cars are crash tested are always informed and invited to witness the test. We sought reactions from both Maruti Suzuki and Datsun.
Nissan India which owns Datsun has told NDTV:
"Automotive regulation standards in fast-growing countries are constantly evolving and as a global manufacturer, we are willing to adopt as well as help evolve standards in vehicular safety."
Commenting on this Maruti Suzuki India said:
"The cars manufactured and sold by Maruti Suzuki in India 'fully conform to all the regulations that are presently applicable in India'. Maruti Suzuki is committed towards Safety- safety for customers and for public at large. We have given a choice to the customers to select variants having air-bags & ABS. We will ensure all products will meet all the future safety regulations well in time."
http://auto.ndtv.com/news/now-maruti-swift-datsun-go-fail-ncap-crash-tests-688031
See this blog about car safety in India as well:
http://sites.ndtv.com/roadsafety/category/safer-cars-for-india/
Some cars will even have multiple airbags, and not just the driver and passenger airbags. There could be curtain, knee, and side airbags for instance – even in cars in mass segments.
But none of these features can tell you if the car is rigid and structurally sound.
So how do you know that? Well, honestly there is no real way for you to know it for a certainty. Of course every salesman will tell you that their car is very safe!
But take the example of the i10 – which is made only in India for the world at the same plant in Chennai.
The Indian model failed the crash test miserably, while when the European car had been tested earlier, it had done very well.
So obviously two different qualities of construction were being used.
This is why we need an India NCAP – or new car assessment programme. This way all manufacturers will have to get their cars tested and certified.
And I don’t just mean any models, but the base models selling in our market.
That guarantees that the car has a star rating, and the lower the number of stars, the less safe the car is. While all cars may not carry such a rating on their brochures, the information will then be publicly available.
http://sites.ndtv.com/roadsafety/what-should-buyers-look-for-to-ensure-car-is-safe/
As for the previous generation, a four-door saloon model was developed for India by Maruti in 2012. This is shorter than the previous generation; now at 3.99 m (157 in) it falls underneath an important tax threshold at four metres of length.
Length 3 995mm
Yeah Bull**** sales man.
But you can't go wrong with a properly Japanese car either from Honda or Suzuki or Daihatsu or Toyota and Subaru.
They just don't make bad cars.
'Good Brio' is an oxymoron.Try a Brio, can get a good one for less than 100k and I still don't get why people hate them.
And neither of your posts confirms that is the exact same specification found in South Africa.
Please try again.
I have Honda Brio just few weeks old. Loving every of it. except design of rear, tiny boot.
Mostly because takes 'plastic' to a scary new level.See its a good car, I still don't get why people have such a hate for this Japanese car,
And why there aren't more of them around!
Makes no sense sometimes....