See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
“MTN is already paying for the use of the temporary spectrum and that amount is at the discretion of ICASA.”Nobody's arguing about the benefits of the temporary spectrum, but this was always intended to be temporary. It's a year later and MTN still want to continue using it (for free?) while interdicting ICASA from holding the auction. As the saying goes: "No good deed goes unpunished".
Thanks for clarifying that. When all is said and done, it's more than a year later and it was a temporary solution. MTN now wants to interdict ICASA from holding the auction (for good reason I believe), but at the same time wants to continue having the cake and eating it. AFAIK, the time frame for the use of the temporary spectrum was never contingent on an auction date.“MTN is already paying for the use of the temporary spectrum and that amount is at the discretion of ICASA.”
Mtn does pay for it.