Death Penalty. Yay or nay?

chiskop

Executive Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Messages
9,214
What is the big difference between then and now ?

Well, instead of using 100% of the State's resources to look after 10% of the population, and measuring our success by that, we are now inconvenienced by having to look after everybody.

Also, in the past we didn't have to worry about human rights, or the small details of whether people were actualy guilty of what they were accused of.

But, some here would like to go back to that barbarism.
 

simple_simon

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
1,194
Point given.

But then if we could protect on group of the country why can't we protect both Black and white ? What is the big difference between then and now ?

the states resources now have to support 43 million people not 9 million any more
 

simple_simon

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
1,194
It is not as simple as this! The crime we are seeing in this country now is explosive and completely out of control. The types of crimes committed have never been seen before in any civilised countries.

These criminals don't just break into homes and steal - they violently rape, and then kill. They are not doing this because the need food.

The cash in transit heists that happen 3 times a day now - why burn the security guards alive, and shoot machine guns into onlookers.

It is all senseless and nobody seems to have the answers. Where is the disincentive for these bloody animals?

actually brasil is in a similar if not worse situation

i recommend watching a movie called "city of god"...its a starting point on the situation in brasil
 

Riq

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
186
But, some here would like to go back to that barbarism.

barbarism? do u not know wat is happening in this country?

Guys... in relative terms, the death penalty is a saint compared to wat happens in this country. If the country barbarically kills even 1 person a year using the death penalty, it'll slow down other murders. people who are against the death penalty should either get out of the country or fix the problem in their more "humane" way
 

morebroadband

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2004
Messages
428
actually brasil is in a similar if not worse situation

i recommend watching a movie called "city of god"...its a starting point on the situation in brasil

I have seen the movie, but on a percentage basis I don't believe their crimes numbers are as high as ours (I am talking about violent crimes). They also have a very bad drug culture, and most of the crime is committed because of fighting for turf or revenging someone etc.
 

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
the states resources now have to support 43 million people not 9 million any more

But if you have minimum 1 million school leavers per year join the army, they can be used to protect all. that would more than double the current police force we have.... what is your responce to that ?
 

Paul_S

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
5,550
I have a question for all the people who say that the death penalty isn't a deterrent:

If you're driving along a road and you know that there is a 80% chance that the speed cops will have a manned speed trap ahead and that the minimum fine is R 10000 would you be more likely to drive below or above the speed limit?

Now please explain to me how the death penalty isn't a deterrent and why it works so well in places like the Middle East.
Even if it only deters 10% of potential murders it's still worth it in my opinion but only when the proof is beyond reasonable doubt (DNA, fingerprints and eye-witnesses).
 

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229
barbarism? do u not know wat is happening in this country?

Guys... in relative terms, the death penalty is a saint compared to wat happens in this country. If the country barbarically kills even 1 person a year using the death penalty, it'll slow down other murders. people who are against the death penalty should either get out of the country or fix the problem in their more "humane" way

No, it won't.
 

GavinMannion

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
5,861
You cannot force people to carry arms and expect them to put themselves in danger. The rich will avoid it and the poor will suffer more...

It is not a viable option.
 

Getafix

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,371
There is NO EVIDENCE that the death penalty reduces crime. Those of you who keep saying it's a deterrant, show me some proof, how about? The death penalty is barbaric, and I for one would hate to live in a country knowing that the State has the power to end my life.

Stay on the correct side of the law and you have nothing to worry about.

It will be an interresting stat to see how manny innocents hanged in SA.

The next piece of wisdom will be: "one is to many"
 

orin76

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
1,647
But if you have minimum 1 million school leavers per year join the army, they can be used to protect all. that would more than double the current police force we have.... what is your responce to that ?

The army is not a police force. The army trains you to kill enemies of the state, the police are supposed to serve their communities. I personally wouldn't want a million psyched up machine gun-wielding alpha male types running around trying to be cops. We have enough such idiots already.
 

Paul_S

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
5,550
The death penalty is barbaric, and I for one would hate to live in a country knowing that the State has the power to end my life.

I hate living in a country where the State does practically nothing to stop someone else ending my life.
 

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
The army is not a police force. The army trains you to kill enemies of the state, the police are supposed to serve their communities. I personally wouldn't want a million psyched up machine gun-wielding alpha male types running around trying to be cops. We have enough such idiots already.

Good so it would keep people indoors !!!!!

There is not way of arguing that this is not a solution. ;)
 

Riq

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
186
No, it won't.

You forget, this is South Africa. Murderer's get released from prison and kill again. If you execute them, they can't do anything now can't they? So of course it will help with the crime rate. Killers will be too dead to kill again.
 

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
You forget, this is South Africa. Murderer's get released from prison and kill again. If you execute them, they can't do anything now can't they? So of course it will help with the crime rate. Killers will be too dead to kill again.

LMAO !!!! :D
 

noswal

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2004
Messages
6,172
Where there is no questionable doubt as to the guilt of criminal then yes, if there is doubt then a life sentence.
 

Riq

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
186
Where there is no questionable doubt as to the guilt of criminal then yes, if there is doubt then a life sentence.

What's the difference between letting an innocent person rot in prison until he dies or killing him quickly? Death is probably less torture in my opinion. So even if there are innocent people who are put to death with the death penalty, they were going to die in prison anyway.
 
Top