Democrats Have Impeached Trump in the House.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spizz

Goat Botherer
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
31,548
No, you're the one coming into this thread calling people all kinds of names without backing anything up. Just answer the question. Since you mentioned konfab's post.

So, WTF have you answered? You made the assertion, you prove it.

^we literally have Hitler's in this thread.

That's a far cry from being trampled upon. Also, the matter of whether there was a crime is still up for debate.

The very charges themselves were accusing him of abuse of power in various guises which were pure and simple him "trampling over democracy". And now you or I cannot say whether he is guilty or not because the process made it impossible for the truth to come out.

On what planet is this not trampling on democracy?

You don't have to answer, I'm through with your straw man.
 

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
Ok... So then, tell me about which wars were fought that were not based on nationalism.

Syria? Afghanistan, Congo... I can go on and on...

Just because you fight for your country, doesn't make war Nationalist. Please explain to me what is wrong about placing your country first and foremost in everything it does. Placing it's citizens first? Proudly SA then a bad thing I suppose?

Come on, you clearly know the difference. however try and prevent yourself from an NPC BSOD error I think.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
Well it's both. Discrimination based on the colour of peoples skin.
There's no way that it's not racism institutionalised by the state. There is no argument even actually.

No, it's 'making reparations based on the colour of people's skin'. That's the argument. If your family stole something from your neighbours, and the government forced you to give back what was stolen, your family isn't being targeted or discriminated against.
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
22,991
No, it's 'making reparations based on the colour of people's skin'. That's the argument. If your family stole something from your neighbours, and the government forced you to give back what was stolen, your family isn't being targeted or discriminated against.
And AA is giving people something back? Even if they never had it to begin with?
 

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,892
The very charges themselves were accusing him of abuse of power in various guises which were pure and simple him "trampling over democracy". And now you or I cannot say whether he is guilty or not because the process made it impossible for the truth to come out.

On what planet is this not trampling on democracy?

You don't have to answer, I'm through with your straw man.

So charges now constitute proof and we're to automatically assume guilt. Talk about ridiculous bs!
 
Last edited:

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,118
No, it's 'making reparations based on the colour of people's skin'. That's the argument. If your family stole something from your neighbours, and the government forced you to give back what was stolen, your family isn't being targeted or discriminated against.
OK then. What have I stolen from black people?

Oh and you cannot be against Trump's anti-Muslim nonsense as well now.

After all banning Muslims from entering the US is simply reparations based on people's Religion. That's the arguement. If your family committed a terrorist attack, and the government decided that they didn't want any more of your family, your family isn't being targeted or discriminated against.
 

Techne

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
12,851
Perhaps you misunderstood me.

I'm not willing to accept an argument that "AA is racist because it's anti-white"
That is because you belong to the same group of people that discriminate based on race. The Apartheid regime, the Nazis, the ANC, the current Israeli regime. Ie just another bigoted racist.
 

Moosedrool

Honorary Master
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
11,441
No, it's 'making reparations based on the colour of people's skin'. That's the argument. If your family stole something from your neighbours, and the government forced you to give back what was stolen, your family isn't being targeted or discriminated against.

No you still don't get it. Let me redo that analogy.

If someone else stole from your neighbours and the governments forced you to to give them x amount and reject you from employment despite not having taken anything you are most definitely being discriminated against.
 

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,118
On this, when would reparations have been reached? You need to be able to quantify it if that is what you're trying to do. So when is equilibrium reached?
It will only be reached when every facet of society has the right amount of overweight transgender black demi-dragon Muslims in it.
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
22,991
Do you have any self awareness at all?

That is literally the core of nationalism... The thing you were accusing Trump of... That Trump wants to get rid of...
It's not nazism if it's anti-white. Just as you can't get anti-white racism..... Self awareness is a foreign concept to some people.....

Being white is clearly sinful..... CONFESS SINNERS CONFESS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top