No, you missed the point. It's no strawman. At the time it was an accepted. You can't judge history by events a hundred years later.
But it has become fashionable to throw as much crap into a subject as possible to win an argument at all costs, not taking historical context into consideration. Do I call you a grub eater to win an argument just because your ancestors probably ate them or some other funny stuff three thousand years back? Yes, I stretched the time frames to illustrate the point. 3000 yrs or a 100 yrs. Society evolves.
And no, I will not call you a grub eater because mine were probably foraging for them with yours. In fact all of the members on this forum. But I guess historical honesty is the first casualty for own goals. Typically SJW do that. So you decide.
Splinter ... balk.
No you missed the point.
You wanted to make me acknowledge that slavery wasn't specific to just them. Which is obvious and was not the point.
The point was contextualised to the BS point made by Jack. Where the founding fathers would be considered as White Nationalists. They wouldn't. Fighting for independence from an oppressive foreign state is not Nationalism.
The point illustrated that if you want to actually bring up something that they could be judged for in modern day context, then their acquiescence and unwillingness to end slavery is the specific element which contrasted them from other slave owning nations at that point in time when they declared independence and penned the constitution.
This was a country born out of repression deciding to continue oppression. This is the nuance you fail to see.
Everyone had slaves. Everyone would be judged negatively by today's standards. That was never the point of my post and why I had no idea of what your point was. It was too obvious, that I could not see why you thought it should be called out. But alas, so easy to strawman it into hur dur EveRYOnE HaD SlAVeS, sO YOU cANt jUDGe tHeM BY tHat STAnDard.
I am not. I am judging them by their failure to seize the opportunity to end it.
What set them apart from other countries at that time and why I brought that up was they had a specific and unique opportunity to end it and did not. That failing also led directly to the Civil War. It is the most significant failing of the founding fathers and the consequences have gone on for centuries. This is the point. And the nuance.