Democrats Have Impeached Trump in the House.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unhappy438

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,915
konfab said:
No credits for partial answers. Medical aids are not allowed to take your risk factors into account when calculating your premium. That ***is*** price fixing.
Click to expand...

They are and they do.

konfab said:
No it won't. It simply shifts the burden onto the taxpayer. Then you have all that administration cost essentially being kept away from market forces. Then you run out of other people's money and have to increase the funding.
Click to expand...

Yes it will, loads of studies even from the likes of the Koch's confirms as much.

konfab said:
No government is more efficient than a market. Healthcare is no different. If you think that this isn't the case, then by all means, give Donald Trump the levers of power to all healthcare in the US. I find it remarkable that in the same thread where the discussion is how a president has abused the power of the office, you have people wanting to give the president even more power. Truly remarkable.
Click to expand...

I've yet to come across a healthcare bill that gives the president more power and control over it. I doubt you could even begin to explain what control or power you are even thinking about here. Truly remarkable.

konfab said:
If you don't control an asset or how you use it, it is nationalised. That is the fact. And you would be on my side if we were talking about the "ownership" of woman's bodies when it comes to the regulation of abortion. Try to have some consistency.
Click to expand...

Yes that is a fact, except thats not what is happening in this case. Are petrol stations nationalised or are they private? Speaking of womens bodies, republicans have nationalised that using your logic. Try to have some consistency.


konfab said:
There isn't any point in discussing economics with people who work on the assumption that a healthcare system run by Donald Trump is going to be more efficient than a free market. And yes that is what you are arguing as you don't know who will be president in the future.
Click to expand...

Thats your incorrect assumption because you haven't educated yourself on a single democrat healthcare bill. Seriously go read them.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
So, Senators now sworn in.

Trial starts 1pm Washington time (8pm local) next Tuesday.
 
TysonRoux

TysonRoux

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
11,456
Pegasus said:
The dems don’t believe in god, so that’s already perjury.
Click to expand...
LOL

That's a new one, they love terrorists, unpatriotic, ROLF, heathens, ........... really badass people.
 
Last edited:
TysonRoux

TysonRoux

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
11,456
Gordon_R said:
Another interesting development:
www.bbc.com

White House 'broke law' by withholding Ukraine aid, says watchdog

A non-partisan US watchdog agency says the White House block on congressional aid was illegal.
www.bbc.com

Edit: Similar link posted above: https://mybroadband.co.za/forum/thr...ched-trump-in-the-house.1061630/post-24735824
Click to expand...
Important point, so also found here.

Imagine if there was no delay bring it to the Senate, there's been a whole load of corruption/impeachment evidence come to light.
 
G

GotToLuveIT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
648
AlmightyBender said:
Greg, this made me lol for real
Click to expand...

ROLF oh just you wait till the snowflakes find out that the rules of evidence excludes hearsay testimony, rest of us will be rolling in the isles.
Poor pencil neck only has 1 fact witness.

And don't even bother with your usual BS
RULES OF EVIDENCE IN AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.
4. Hearsay testimony. Sections 2230-2237.

Hinds' Precedents, Volume 3 - Chapter 69 - Rules of Evidence in an Impeachment Trial

www.govinfo.gov

We certainly must try the case according to the rules of evidence. We want to see the records themselves.

Let me help you with that, this is how impeachable abuse of power looks.
Skip to 52:00, watch him boast about removing a state prosecutor investigating his know nothing crack head sonny boy.

We will be waiting here while you find anything close to this that Trump said.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
GotToLuveIT said:
ROLF oh just you wait till the snowflakes find out that the rules of evidence excludes hearsay testimony, rest of us will be rolling in the isles.
Poor pencil neck only has 1 fact witness.

And don't even bother with your usual BS
RULES OF EVIDENCE IN AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.
4. Hearsay testimony. Sections 2230-2237.

Hinds' Precedents, Volume 3 - Chapter 69 - Rules of Evidence in an Impeachment Trial

www.govinfo.gov

We certainly must try the case according to the rules of evidence. We want to see the records themselves.

Let me help you with that, this is how impeachable abuse of power looks.
Skip to 52:00, watch him boast about removing a state prosecutor investigating his know nothing crack head sonny boy.

We will be waiting here while you find anything close to this that Trump said.
Click to expand...

Just as well Mitch has said he's going to be guided by the rules from the Clinton impeachment, in 1999...

... and not, you know, the rules Senate used to impeach a judge in 1830.


The rest of your post is Qanon tinfoil...

people-whimsical-lazy-silly.jpg
 
G

GotToLuveIT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
648
greg0205 said:
Just as well Mitch has said he's going to be guided by the rules from the Clinton impeachment, in 1999...

... and not, you know, the rules Senate used to impeach a judge in 1830.


The rest of your post is Qanon tinfoil...

people-whimsical-lazy-silly.jpg
Click to expand...

The trial is guided by the chief justice, not the senators. The senators have 0 say about the rules of evidence.
You want to submit hear say testimony you have to submit the original record.
He was speaking to allowing witness or not.
Either way under federal law, rules of evince states it has to be a fact witness, hearsay testimony is not admissible.
 
Temujin

Temujin

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2015
Messages
18,302
GotToLuveIT said:
ROLF oh just you wait till the snowflakes find out that the rules of evidence excludes hearsay testimony, rest of us will be rolling in the isles.
Poor pencil neck only has 1 fact witness.

And don't even bother with your usual BS
RULES OF EVIDENCE IN AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.
4. Hearsay testimony. Sections 2230-2237.

Hinds' Precedents, Volume 3 - Chapter 69 - Rules of Evidence in an Impeachment Trial

www.govinfo.gov

We certainly must try the case according to the rules of evidence. We want to see the records themselves.

Let me help you with that, this is how impeachable abuse of power looks.
Skip to 52:00, watch him boast about removing a state prosecutor investigating his know nothing crack head sonny boy.

We will be waiting here while you find anything close to this that Trump said.
Click to expand...
EM6DUpEWkAABULm
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
GotToLuveIT said:
The trial is guided by the chief justice, not the senators. The senators have 0 say about the rules of evidence.
You want to submit hear say testimony you have to submit the original record.
He was speaking to allowing witness or not.
Either way under federal law, rules of evince states it has to be a fact witness, hearsay testimony is not admissible.
Click to expand...

Roberts can be overruled by a majority...

Maybe the 24-hour Engen has some more foil for you.
 
G

GotToLuveIT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
648
greg0205 said:
Roberts can be overruled by a majority...

Maybe the 24-hour Engen has some more foil for you.
Click to expand...

Only on the rules package not federal law.
As your Dem hero's' have been bleating, nobody is above the law, not even pencil neck and in name only speaker Pelosi.
If you don't understand how it works, what an episode of Judge Judy, when she rips a clown and tells them you cant tell me what XYZ said = hearsay testimony.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
GotToLuveIT said:
Only on the rules package not federal law.
As your Dem hero's' have been bleating, nobody is above the law, not even pencil neck and in name only speaker Pelosi.
If you don't understand how it works, what an episode of Judge Judy, when she rips a clown and tells them you cant tell me what XYZ said = hearsay testimony.
Click to expand...

*heroes*

The plural noun is heroes.
 
G

GotToLuveIT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
648
greg0205 said:
Roberts can be overruled by a majority...

Maybe the 24-hour Engen has some more foil for you.
Click to expand...

Oh I have enough foil to pop all the popcorn in the world watching your dem kiddy show get schooled by the grown-ups in the room.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top