Defense from whom exactly? Our tit government officials perhaps?
“We are engaging with our shareholder, the public enterprises ministry, on the financial and strategic support required for the stabilization of Denel,” the company said. “We have requested funding from the Department of Defence for the maintenance of strategic and sovereign capabilities.”
FFS, nobody calls it the Red Falcon, please change the headline to Rooivalk.
ThisWTF is a Red Falcon lmao.
We don't say Badger IFV.
We don't say Elephant Tank.
We don't say ZT3 Leopard ATGM.
It's the Rooivalk.
It's the Ratel IFV.
It's the Olifant Tank.
It's the ZT3 Ingwe ATGM.
One minor error here. The Badger and Ratel are separate vehicles with the Badger earmarked as the Ratel's replacement.WTF is a Red Falcon lmao.
We don't say Badger IFV.
We don't say Elephant Tank.
We don't say ZT3 Leopard ATGM.
It's the Rooivalk.
It's the Ratel IFV.
It's the Olifant Tank.
It's the ZT3 Ingwe ATGM.
There is no error. Ratel also means Badger. You're making my point for me.One minor error here. The Badger and Ratel are separate vehicles with the Badger earmarked as the Ratel's replacement.
From DENEL's perspective only one of these two vehicles matterThere is no error. Ratel also means Badger. You're making my point for me.
I'm not talking about the new planned IFV, with an English name, that'll never replace the Ratel.
On that note, remember when the TTD was meant to replace the Olifant. That was definitely going to happen.![]()


Again, you're making my point for me. Things that should be called by their name, and not their translation.From DENEL's perspective only one of these two vehicles matter
Here we have the Ratel
View attachment 946182
Here we have the Badger which DENEL is responsible for though if we will ever see them in numbers is another story.
View attachment 946186
Good thing we don't have to have equipment that's better than the US, just equipment that's better than our neighbours.Correct, the Rooivalk is unfortunately by now outdated.
This is the future:
![]()
Boeing reveals new attack helicopter design - Aerospace Manufacturing
Boeing has gone public with its submission to the US Army’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft competition, simply named Boeing FARA.www.aero-mag.com
View attachment 946252
That looks like they had some commanche fuselages leftCorrect, the Rooivalk is unfortunately by now outdated.
This is the future:
![]()
Boeing reveals new attack helicopter design - Aerospace Manufacturing
Boeing has gone public with its submission to the US Army’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft competition, simply named Boeing FARA.www.aero-mag.com
View attachment 946252
Correct, the Rooivalk is unfortunately by now outdated.
This is the future:
![]()
Boeing reveals new attack helicopter design - Aerospace Manufacturing
Boeing has gone public with its submission to the US Army’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft competition, simply named Boeing FARA.www.aero-mag.com
View attachment 946252
/Cough
Like the Comanche
No, the Rooivalk isn't outdated, not in design, and the systems and mounts can be updated. Foreign interested parties will in any case upgrade the Rooivalk with their own systems (incl. weapons systems).
The Indians recently ordered Apaches, all custom. The AH64 is still in by popular demand, and do you consider it as outdated?
No, not the Companche (appearances notwhithstanding) - that design is ancient and proved too advanced for its time. Technology has moved along since then though.
And not the Boeing FARA apparently too.
There are two contenders left: Sikorsky S-97 Raider and Bell 360 Invictus.
![]()
US Army selects Bell and Sikorsky to build FARA prototypes
The US Army has selected Bell and Sikorsky to design and test Future Attack and Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) Competitive Prototypes.www.flightglobal.com
The Sikorsky was even flown by an army pilot recently, so it looks promising for Lockheed Martin there (again).
![]()
U.S. Army pilot takes Raider side stick in first flight of Sikorsky FVL offerings
On Aug. 19, a U.S. Army pilot sat in the left seat and took control of the Sikorsky S-97 Raider for most of an 80-minute flight.verticalmag.com
But on the subject of old Rooivalk. Honestly, you know there needs to be constant updates and development for any airframe to stay relevant. That costs hundres of millions of dollars and it need someone to believe that the design will pay off in order to invest that money. No one realistically sees Denel as being able to upgrade the Rooivalk to any modern standard. If it was done in 1994, then it stood a chance. Sadly, a good piece of tech was not developed and the market for that has moved on. There will be plenty of second-hand Apaches (D-model) available on the market soon as well.
Remember, it is not just the helicopter, you need to develop a whole eco-system for it too with integration with many weapons and systems to be effective, that takes time and money and equipment.
Even HAL in India is in the process of designing their own 10-12ton attack helicopter.
What do the Rooivalk sales figures look like?We can have a long discussion, but the Rooivalk Mk 2 is viable which is the export model. The current Mk1F have proven to be capable in its UN peacekeeping deployments and has been maintained since 2011. Yes, it is relevant.
What do the Rooivalk sales figures look like?