- May 25, 2011
Boot lickers: Lets make scenarios so we can continue licking the boot.
See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
A juror who voted to convict former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin of murdering George Floyd is defending his decision to attend a social justice demonstration last year.
During the jury selection process, the AP noted, all jurors were asked two questions as part of a jury selection questionnaire.
“Did you, or someone close to you, participate in any of the demonstrations or marches against police brutality that took place in Minneapolis after George Floyd’s death?” the first asked, with the second asking: “Other than what you have already described above, have you, or anyone close to you, participated in protests about police use of force or police brutality?”
Mitchell reportedly answered "no" to both questions
Hes been so busy with his attempt to create a career out of this and shilling his podcast in every interview etc he doesn't care that hes now shown he flat out lied to the judge
Chauvin juror on attending protest: 'It was a good opportunity to be a part of something'
WAPO has the same story
This chop might as well have printed Chauvin a get-out-of-jail card.
First, Candace is a grifter, and her con is making white folks feel better about their own racism. Business for Candace is good.
Second, if you're buying her BS, I'm a Nigerian prince. I've managed to smuggle a crate full of US$ out of Nigeria but I had to coat the notes in a chemical to avoid detection at customs... I'm a little short of cash to buy the cleaning agent, so if you could advance me R10 000,00 right now, I'll cut you in for $1 000 000,00 payout when it's done.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/derek-chauvin-juror-trial-watching-die-daily-basis/story?id=77361744"We were really just locked in on the case," Mitchell told ABC News' Robin Roberts in his first television interview, which aired Wednesday on "Good Morning America."
The guy went onto national TV for some grifting. Then all someone had to do was search on Facebook and they found a pretty damning picture of him.
Him lying to the court about going to a rally is a serious problem, as Chauvin has a right to a fair trial whether you want it or not, and part of that process is to make sure that the jurors are impartial.
Are you so desperate for a guilty verdict that you don't think this is an issue?
During the jury selection, Chauvin’s defence lawyer Eric Nelson was told by Mr Mitchell that he had seen video footage of the incident, that he had spoken about the case with his family and friends, that he had wondered why the other officers didn’t stop Chauvin, and that his view of Black Lives Matter was “very favourable”
Dumb assHes been so busy with his attempt to create a career out of this and shilling his podcast in every interview etc he doesn't care that hes now shown he flat out lied to the judge
'I know noffin about the george floyd case and will be impartial' he says whilst tucking his 'get off our necks' tee under his mattress
'So you can check out my podcast and donate to me'
Oh the irony - it's laughable. A BLM sod providing grounds for an appeal. What a deceitful little bugger. Not unexpected, I suppose.
That's the sort of thing Zuma's acolytes used to say, fair trial not possible, justice delayed is justice denied, therefore let him off scot-free...Oh the irony - it's laughable. A BLM sod providing grounds for an appeal. What a deceitful little bugger. Not unexpected, I suppose.
I reiterate my post #10 with more vigor.
A fair trial is impossible in this case.
Saying a fair trial isn't possible is the sort of thing people say when they are afraid of going to trial, i.e. You know, when they are guilty as sin.No idea what you on about. Got zero to do with my post.
"NIEHAUS: ZUMA WON’T GET FAIR TRIAL"