w1z4rd
Karmic Sangoma
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
- Messages
- 49,747
There was something about the recent conflict between Israel and hezbollah in Lebanon known as the 33 day war, that did not seem right when I watched events take place.
Firstly was the lack of international condemnation from the rest of the world. I am not saying countries did not not condemn the actions (of both sides), what I am saying is that other than for the usual suspects... they were not as vocal as usual.
I was debating with someone about the possible rationality and sense of an Israeli offensive into Lebanon. Israel must have known that it would get some extremely bad press, and the excuses it used to invade Lebanon were very weak. The associate I spoke to seemed to think that "Israel was jelous of the booming economy in Lebanon"
This brought me back to a documentary I watched a year or two ago. In the documentary is explained how the Iran/Syria funded Hezbollah controlled the southern part of Lebanon. Hezbollah was both a political and military force the Lebanese government could not control.
A couple of other things that caught my attention was a very very feeble outcry from the Lebanese government. It did not ask either Syria or Iran for help.
Israel goes in. Hammers the hell out of Hezbollah, then 33 days later pulls out, and then in come the under forced UN soldiers to try create a buffer zone.
This last week I read an article about how the Hezbollah leaders are accusing the Lebanese government of "cutting off Hezbollah supply lines" during the 33 day war.
The only losers in this were Hezbollah. Israel got a safer UN controlled border. The Lebanese government got rid of the military and political danger that controlled its southern provinces.
Is it possible that the Lebanese government could have full known all this was to happen? Could they have had any type of involvement in it? What are your thoughts?
Firstly was the lack of international condemnation from the rest of the world. I am not saying countries did not not condemn the actions (of both sides), what I am saying is that other than for the usual suspects... they were not as vocal as usual.
I was debating with someone about the possible rationality and sense of an Israeli offensive into Lebanon. Israel must have known that it would get some extremely bad press, and the excuses it used to invade Lebanon were very weak. The associate I spoke to seemed to think that "Israel was jelous of the booming economy in Lebanon"
This brought me back to a documentary I watched a year or two ago. In the documentary is explained how the Iran/Syria funded Hezbollah controlled the southern part of Lebanon. Hezbollah was both a political and military force the Lebanese government could not control.
A couple of other things that caught my attention was a very very feeble outcry from the Lebanese government. It did not ask either Syria or Iran for help.
Israel goes in. Hammers the hell out of Hezbollah, then 33 days later pulls out, and then in come the under forced UN soldiers to try create a buffer zone.
This last week I read an article about how the Hezbollah leaders are accusing the Lebanese government of "cutting off Hezbollah supply lines" during the 33 day war.
The only losers in this were Hezbollah. Israel got a safer UN controlled border. The Lebanese government got rid of the military and political danger that controlled its southern provinces.
Is it possible that the Lebanese government could have full known all this was to happen? Could they have had any type of involvement in it? What are your thoughts?
Last edited: