Dinosaur feather evolution trapped in Canadian amber

Geriatrix

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
6,554
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14933298
Samples of amber in western Canada containing feathers from dinosaurs and birds have yielded the most complete story of feather evolution ever seen.

Eleven fragments show the progression from hair-like "filaments" to doubly-branched feathers of modern birds.

The analysis of the 80-million-year-old amber deposits is presented in Science.

The find, along with an accompanying article analysing feather pigment, adds to the idea that many dinosaurs sported feathers - some brightly coloured.

Recent years have seen a proliferation of reports about the beginnings of feathers as we know them now in birds.

So-called compression fossils found in China bear outlines of primitive "filament" feathers that are more akin to hair.

But modern feathers are highly branched and structured, and the full story of how those came to be had not yet been revealed by the fossil record.

Now a study of amber found near Grassy Lake in Alberta - dated from what is known as the Late Cretaceous period - has unearthed a full range of feather structures that demonstrate the progression.

"We're finding two ends of the evolutionary development that had been proposed for feathers trapped in the same amber deposit," said Ryan McKellar of the University of Alberta, lead author of the report.

The team's find confirms that the filaments progressed to tufts of filaments from a single origin, called barbs. In later development, some of these barbs can coalesce into a central branch called a rachis. As the structure develops further, further branches of filments form from the rachis.

"We've got feathers that look to be little filamentous hair-like feathers, we've got the same filaments bound together in clumps, and then we've got a series that are for all intents and purposes identical to modern feathers," Mr McKellar told BBC News.

"We're catching some that look to be dinosaur feathers and another set that are pretty much dead ringers for modern birds."

Lucky find

By the Late Cretaceous, feathers had more or less reached the end of their evolution, and it is simply lucky that specimens bearing the full range of different feather types happened to be captured in the same amber deposit.

"We've known for quite a while that several of the non-bird dinosaurs actually had feathers and many of them had feathers that are identical to the feathers you see on a pigeon in the park today," said Mark Norell, chairman of the palaeontology division at the American Museum of Natural History.

"What's interesting is the diversity of feathers that were present in [these] non-avian dinosaurs that existed pretty close to that time interval when those animals disappeared around 65 million years ago," he told the BBC.

The most developed of the feathers seem to be similar to water-dwelling and diving birds - almost like down. However, Mr McKellar said that none of the feathers was adapted for flight, but rather for an ever-more complex ornamentation strategy.

A second article in Science examines another aspect of the ornamentation: colour.

Feathers are given their colour by structures in their cells called melanosomes, which contain melanin, the same chemical that gives us our skin colour. Study of remnants of these melanosomes has already yielded evidence for example that one of the first feathered dinosaurs ever discovered, the Sinosauropteryx, was a "redhead".

But most often, the melanosomes of feathers or the melanin they leave behind are destroyed with time, leaving few clues as to what colour a given dinosaur would have been.

Now Roy Wogelius of the University of Manchester in the UK has shown a method using high-energy rays of light from a synchrotron that can spot tiny amounts of metal atoms left behind by eumelanin, one of the types of melanin responsible for a range of black and brown colours.

"A perfect understanding of colour is unlikely except in perhaps exceptional cases," Dr Wogelius said in an online chat about the work in July.

"But, with the technological advances we are optimistic that we will be able to find chemical details beyond simply dark and light patterning."

In fact, a picture is emerging that many dinosaurs were not the dull-coloured, reptilian-skinned creatures that they were once thought to be.

"If you were to transport yourself back 80 million years to western North America and walk around the forest... so many of the animals would have been feathered," said Dr Norell.

"We're getting more and more evidence... that these animals were also brightly coloured, just like birds are today."
Dinosaurs had feathers. Awesome. I wonder if T-Rex puffed himself up when it got a bit nippy.
 

stricken

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
2,265
This is good news. A large gap in evolutionary biology has been filled and a few hypothesis proved to be correct.
 

Elimentals

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 11, 2010
Messages
10,819
I wanted to post this just now, but with a question, if we look at findings like this is it safe to say that there was no Dinosaur extinction event and more of a culling event seeing that Dinosaurs as we knew them is birds of today?

Esp if you look at the following
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinosauropteryx
250px-Sinosauropteryx_mmartyniuk_solosml.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microraptor
220px-Microraptor_mmartyniuk.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caudipteryx
220px-Caudipteryx2mmartyniuk.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchiornis
220px-Anchiornis_martyniuk.png


Where do you draw the line where Dinosaurs end and birds begin
 

LithIX

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
233
Where do you draw the line where Dinosaurs end and birds begin

Interesting question: But afaik birds don't have teeth, so my uneducated answer would lie between the time that jaws turned into beeks.

Anyway, back to the topic:
I welcome this discovery! Since I was a little boy, I found Dinosaurs very facinating. Had all the dino books one can dream of, and one thing bugged be a lot back then:
How can this extinct beasts be "reptillian", when they (their sceletons) look just like birds?

Anyway :)
 

Geriatrix

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
6,554
I wanted to post this just now, but with a question, if we look at findings like this is it safe to say that there was no Dinosaur extinction event and more of a culling event seeing that Dinosaurs as we knew them is birds of today?

Esp if you look at the following
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinosauropteryx
250px-Sinosauropteryx_mmartyniuk_solosml.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microraptor
220px-Microraptor_mmartyniuk.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caudipteryx
220px-Caudipteryx2mmartyniuk.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchiornis
220px-Anchiornis_martyniuk.png


Where do you draw the line where Dinosaurs end and birds begin
Well there is no real line, its only in our minds that we differentiate. Most creatures died when the comet hit Mexico. But those few that survived continued to live on and evolve.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,973
There have been a few interesting documentaries on this recently, where they've recreated dinosaurs with feathers, t-rex doesn't look as scary :)

Sent from my U20i using MyBroadband Android App
 

DigitalSoldier

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
10,185
Well there is no real line, its only in our minds that we differentiate. Most creatures died when the comet hit Mexico. But those few that survived continued to live on and evolve.

Interesting.

One question though: those small arms of dinosaurs, could it have been the early development of wings.

Sorry if its a silly question, but the small arms never made any sense to me. Why evolve such useless limbs. They served absolutely no purpose AFAIK.


Sent from my HTC Desire using MyBroadband Android App
 

porchrat

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
34,277
Interesting.

One question though: those small arms of dinosaurs, could it have been the early development of wings.

Sorry if its a silly question, but the small arms never made any sense to me. Why evolve such useless limbs. They served absolutely no purpose AFAIK.
Vestigial limbs. Some species of dinos were in the process of losing those arms much like whales are today in the process of losing their hind legs. Some modern whales still have vestigial hind legs.

So the reason those arms seem useless to you is because for the most part they were useless. The dinos just hadn't lost them entirely yet.

The ones that developed wings had much longer arms. You can see some examples of those that are closer to birds in fossils today.
 
Last edited:
Top